Literature DB >> 25763516

A New Tool to Assess the Perception of Stretching Intensity.

Sandro R Freitas1, João R Vaz, Luis Gomes, Rui Silvestre, Edgar Hilário, Nuno Cordeiro, Filomena Carnide, Pedro Pezarat-Correia, Pedro Mil-Homens.   

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a valid and reliable scale to assess the perception of stretching intensity below and above the maximal range of motion. Experiments were conducted through a passive leg extension angle-torque assessment to healthy population (n = 90). In the study's first phase, the visual, numerical, and description of the stretching intensity scale (SIS) components were developed. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, absolute magnitude estimation (AME) score, and verbal stretching intensity symptom descriptors were assessed for different stretching intensities. In the second phase, the SIS was tested for validity, reliability, scale production, and estimation properties as well as responsiveness to stretching. In the first phase, a high correlation was found between SIS score and range of motion (ROM), as well as SIS and torque in both submaximal (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.89-0.99, r = 0.88-0.99) and supramaximal (ICC = 0.75-0.86, r = 0.68-0.88) stretching intensities. The AME and VAS scores fitted well in an exponential model for submaximal stretching intensities (y = 14.829e, ICC = 0.97 [0.83-0.99], r = 0.98), and in a linear model for supramaximal stretching intensities (y = 0.7667x - 25.751, ICC = 0.97 [0.89-0.99], r = 0.9594). For the second phase, a high correlation was found between SIS score and ROM (r = 0.70-0.76, ICC = 0.76-0.85), as well as SIS and torque (r = 0.62-0.88, ICC = 0.57-0.85). The interday reliability was high to produce (r = 0.70, ICC = 0.70 [0.50-0.83]) or estimate (r = 0.89, ICC = 0.89 [0.82-0.93]) stretching intensities. The acute stretching effects on ROM and passive torque were detectable using the SIS. It is expected a high application in assessing the stretch intensity using the SIS in future studies and practical interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25763516     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Acute muscle and joint mechanical responses following a high-intensity stretching protocol.

Authors:  Sandro R Freitas; Ricardo J Andrade; Antoine Nordez; Bruno Mendes; Pedro Mil-Homens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Acute and chronic effects of static stretching at 100% versus 120% intensity on flexibility.

Authors:  Taizan Fukaya; Shingo Matsuo; Masahiro Iwata; Eiji Yamanaka; Wakako Tsuchida; Yuji Asai; Shigeyuki Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Comparison Between Contract-Relax Stretching and Antagonist Contract-Relax Stretching on Gastrocnemius Medialis Passive Properties.

Authors:  Taizan Fukaya; Andreas Konrad; Shigeru Sato; Ryosuke Kiyono; Kaoru Yahata; Koki Yasaka; Remi Onuma; Riku Yoshida; Masatoshi Nakamura
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  The UP150: A Multifactorial Environmental Intervention to Promote Employee Physical and Mental Well-Being.

Authors:  Pietro Luigi Invernizzi; Gabriele Signorini; Raffaele Scurati; Giovanni Michielon; Stefano Benedini; Andrea Bosio; Walter Staiano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.