OBJECTIVE: To describe academic progression and retention policies used by US colleges and schools of pharmacy. METHODS: Student handbooks on the Web sites of 122 colleges and schools of pharmacy were reviewed between February 2012 and May 2012. RESULTS: Data were available and obtained from 98 (80%) programs. Most used grade point average (GPA) as a criterion for progression, with 66% requiring a minimum GPA of 2.0. Cumulative GPA was the most frequently used criteria for probation. Most handbooks did not address remediation, but 38% noted that a failed course could only be retaken once. The most common criteria for dismissal were the cumulative number of times a student was on probation. The graduation requirements of most programs were a cumulative GPA of 2.0 and completion of the program within 6 years of enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Colleges and schools of pharmacy use various criteria for academic progression and retention and frequently provide incomplete or inadequate information related to probation, progression, and dismissal. Information regarding remediation and academic performance during experiential learning is lacking. A clearinghouse containing institutional data related to progression and retention would assist programs in developing academic policies. The study also highlights the need for ACPE to ensure this information is provided to students.
OBJECTIVE: To describe academic progression and retention policies used by US colleges and schools of pharmacy. METHODS: Student handbooks on the Web sites of 122 colleges and schools of pharmacy were reviewed between February 2012 and May 2012. RESULTS: Data were available and obtained from 98 (80%) programs. Most used grade point average (GPA) as a criterion for progression, with 66% requiring a minimum GPA of 2.0. Cumulative GPA was the most frequently used criteria for probation. Most handbooks did not address remediation, but 38% noted that a failed course could only be retaken once. The most common criteria for dismissal were the cumulative number of times a student was on probation. The graduation requirements of most programs were a cumulative GPA of 2.0 and completion of the program within 6 years of enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: Colleges and schools of pharmacy use various criteria for academic progression and retention and frequently provide incomplete or inadequate information related to probation, progression, and dismissal. Information regarding remediation and academic performance during experiential learning is lacking. A clearinghouse containing institutional data related to progression and retention would assist programs in developing academic policies. The study also highlights the need for ACPE to ensure this information is provided to students.
Authors: David F Maize; Stephen H Fuller; Philip M Hritcko; Rae R Matsumoto; Denise A Soltis; Reza R Taheri; Wendy Duncan Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: William B Call; Gloria R Grice; Katie B Tellor; Anastasia L Armbruster; Anne M Spurlock; Tricia M Berry Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Emma C Palmer; Emily R Esposito; Maria Shin; Sarah E Raake; Daniel R Malcom; Kimberly K Daugherty Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Emily R Esposito; Emma C Palmer; Amber R Douglass; Daniel R Malcom; Arthur G Cox; Sarah E Raake; Kimberly K Daugherty Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.047