Literature DB >> 33149091

Admissions Is Not Enough: The Racial Achievement Gap in Medical Education.

Alana C Jones1, Alana C Nichols2, Carmel M McNicholas3, Fatima C Stanford4.   

Abstract

The achievement gap is a disparity in academic and standardized test performance that exists between White and underrepresented minority (URM) students that begins as early as preschool and worsens as students progress through the educational system. Medical education is not immune to this inequality. URM medical students are more likely to experience delayed graduation and course failure, even after accounting for science grade point average and Medical College Admission Test performance. Moreover, URM students are more likely to earn lower scores on licensing examinations, which can have a significant impact on their career trajectory, including specialty choice and residency competitiveness. After the release of preliminary recommendations from the Invitational Conference on USMLE Scoring (InCUS) and public commentary on these recommendations, the National Board of Medical Examiners and Federation of State Medical Boards announced that the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 would transition from a 3-digit numeric score to pass/fail scoring. Given that another of InCUS's recommendations was to "minimize racial demographic differences that exist in USMLE performance," it is paramount to consider the impact of this scoring change on URM medical students specifically. Holistic admissions are a step in the right direction of acknowledging that URM students often travel a further distance to reach medical school. However, when residency programs emphasize USMLE performance (or any standardized test score) despite persistent test score gaps, medical education contributes to the disproportionate harm URM students face and bolsters segregation across medical specialties. This Perspective provides a brief explanation of the achievement gap, its psychological consequences, and its consequences in medical education; discusses the potential effect of the Step 1 scoring change on URM medical students; and provides a review of strategies to redress this disparity.
Copyright © 2020 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33149091      PMCID: PMC7855342          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   7.840


  44 in total

1.  Racial bias in using USMLE step 1 scores to grant internal medicine residency interviews.

Authors:  M B Edmond; J L Deschenes; M Eckler; R P Wenzel
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Stereotype Threat.

Authors:  Steven J Spencer; Christine Logel; Paul G Davies
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  A prematriculation intervention to improve the adjustment of students to medical school.

Authors:  Wayne A Wilson; Matthew K Henry; Glenna Ewing; Jamie Rehmann; Craig A Canby; Jeffrey T Gray; Edward P Finnerty
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Medical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.

Authors:  Adrian C C Gooi; Connor S Sommerfeld
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  The Conundrum of the United States Medical Licensing Examination Score Reporting Structure.

Authors:  Jennifer L Swails; Omowunmi Aibana; Barbara J Stoll
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Reducing Reliance on Test Scores Reduces Racial Bias in Neurology Residency Recruitment.

Authors:  Andrew R Spector; Kenyon M Railey
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Examining Demographics, Prior Academic Performance, and United States Medical Licensing Examination Scores.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rubright; Michael Jodoin; Michael A Barone
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Underrepresented Minority Applicants Are Competitive for Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Programs, but Enter Residency at Lower Rates.

Authors:  Selina Poon; Kate Nellans; Alyssa Rothman; Rocio A L Crabb; Stephen F Wendolowski; Daniel Kiridly; Rachel Gecelter; Prakash Gorroochurn; Nadeen O Chahine
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Anticipating the Impact of the USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail Scoring Decision on Underrepresented-in-Medicine Students.

Authors:  William McDade; Monica B Vela; J P Sánchez
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  The Impact of Gender Stereotypes on the Self-Concept of Female Students in STEM Subjects with an Under-Representation of Females.

Authors:  Bernhard Ertl; Silke Luttenberger; Manuela Paechter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-17
View more
  2 in total

1.  Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Patients With Meningioma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hudin N Jackson; Caroline C Hadley; A Basit Khan; Ron Gadot; James C Bayley; Arya Shetty; Jacob Mandel; Ali Jalali; K Kelly Gallagher; Alex D Sweeney; Arif O Harmanci; Akdes S Harmanci; Tiemo Klisch; Shankar P Gopinath; Ganesh Rao; Daniel Yoshor; Akash J Patel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Challenging the deficit discourse in medical schools through reverse mentoring-using discourse analysis to explore staff perceptions of under-represented medical students.

Authors:  Sally Curtis; Heather Mozley; Chloe Langford; Joseph Hartland; Jacquie Kelly
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.