Literature DB >> 33148675

Discrimination of Breast Cancer from Healthy Breast Tissue Using a Three-component Diffusion-weighted MRI Model.

Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen1, Ana E Rodríguez-Soto2, Rebecca Rakow-Penner3, Anders M Dale2,4, Christopher C Conlin2, Igor Vidić5, Tyler M Seibert2,6,7, Anne M Wallace8, Somaye Zare9, Joshua Kuperman2, Boya Abudu10, Grace S Ahn10, Michael Hahn2, Neil P Jerome1,5, Agnes Østlie1, Tone F Bathen1,11, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier2, Pål Erik Goa5,11.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) is a contrast-free modality that has demonstrated ability to discriminate between predefined benign and malignant breast lesions. However, how well DW-MRI discriminates cancer from all other breast tissue voxels in a clinical setting is unknown. Here we explore the voxelwise ability to distinguish cancer from healthy breast tissue using signal contributions from the newly developed three-component multi-b-value DW-MRI model. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Patients with pathology-proven breast cancer from two datasets (n = 81 and n = 25) underwent multi-b-value DW-MRI. The three-component signal contributions C 1 and C 2 and their product, C 1 C 2, and signal fractions F 1, F 2, and F 1 F 2 were compared with the image defined on maximum b-value (DWI max), conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and apparent diffusion kurtosis (K app). The ability to discriminate between cancer and healthy breast tissue was assessed by the false-positive rate given a sensitivity of 80% (FPR80) and ROC AUC.
RESULTS: Mean FPR80 for both datasets was 0.016 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.024] for C 1 C 2, 0.136 (95% CI, 0.092-0.180) for C 1, 0.068 (95% CI, 0.049-0.087) for C 2, 0.462 (95% CI, 0.425-0.499) for F 1 F 2, 0.832 (95% CI, 0.797-0.868) for F 1, 0.176 (95% CI, 0.150-0.203) for F 2, 0.159 (95% CI, 0.114-0.204) for DWI max, 0.731 (95% CI, 0.692-0.770) for ADC, and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.660-0.709) for K app. Mean ROC AUC for C 1 C 2 was 0.984 (95% CI, 0.977-0.991).
CONCLUSIONS: The C 1 C 2 parameter of the three-component model yields a clinically useful discrimination between cancer and healthy breast tissue, superior to other DW-MRI methods and obliviating predefining lesions. This novel DW-MRI method may serve as noncontrast alternative to standard-of-care dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. ©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33148675      PMCID: PMC8174004          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  50 in total

1.  Application of the diffusion kurtosis model for the study of breast lesions.

Authors:  Luísa Nogueira; Sofia Brandão; Eduarda Matos; Rita Gouveia Nunes; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos; Hugo Alexandre Ferreira
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.

Authors:  D Le Bihan; E Breton; D Lallemand; P Grenier; E Cabanis; M Laval-Jeantet
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Accuracy of breast cancer lesion classification using intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging is improved by the inclusion of global or local prior knowledge with bayesian methods.

Authors:  Igor Vidić; Neil P Jerome; Tone F Bathen; Pål E Goa; Peter T While
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Relationship between kurtosis and bi-exponential characterization of high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging: application to prostate cancer.

Authors:  Roshan A Karunamuni; Joshua Kuperman; Tyler M Seibert; Natalie Schenker; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; V S Sundar; Jose R Teruel; Pal E Goa; David S Karow; Anders M Dale; Nathan S White
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.990

5.  Tissue composition of mammographically dense and non-dense breast tissue.

Authors:  Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Carol Reynolds; Christopher G Scott; V S Pankratz; Darren L Riehle; Wilma L Lingle; Tonye Odogwu; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; James N Ingle; Lynn C Hartmann; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Monoexponential, Biexponential, and stretched-exponential models using diffusion-weighted imaging: A quantitative differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0T.

Authors:  Ya-Nan Jin; Yan Zhang; Jing-Liang Cheng; Dan-Dan Zheng; Ying Hu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T.

Authors:  Yoshito Tsushima; Ayako Takahashi-Taketomi; Keigo Endo
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Improved conspicuity and delineation of high-grade primary and metastatic brain tumors using "restriction spectrum imaging": quantitative comparison with high B-value DWI and ADC.

Authors:  N S White; C R McDonald; N Farid; J M Kuperman; S Kesari; A M Dale
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing tumor microstructure and improving diagnostic performance on breast MRI: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Daniel S Hippe; Habib Rahbar; Sana Parsian; Mara H Rendi; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) histogram biomarkers for prediction of neoadjuvant treatment response in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Gene Y Cho; Lucas Gennaro; Elizabeth J Sutton; Emily C Zabor; Zhigang Zhang; Dilip Giri; Linda Moy; Daniel K Sodickson; Elizabeth A Morris; Eric E Sigmund; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2017-08-18
View more
  4 in total

1.  Clinical experience of tensor-valued diffusion encoding for microstructure imaging by diffusional variance decomposition in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Eun Cho; Hye Jin Baek; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Hyo Jung An; Eun Jung Jung; Ho-Joon Lee; Joonsung Lee; Sung-Min Gho
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-03

2.  Characterization of the diffusion signal of breast tissues using multi-exponential models.

Authors:  Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Lauren K Fang; Christopher C Conlin; Helen H Park; Grace S Ahn; Hauke Bartsch; Joshua Kuperman; Igor Vidić; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Anne M Wallace; Michael Hahn; Tyler M Seibert; Neil Peter Jerome; Agnes Østlie; Tone Frost Bathen; Pål Erik Goa; Rebecca Rakow-Penner; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.737

3.  Tri-Compartmental Restriction Spectrum Imaging Breast Model Distinguishes Malignant Lesions from Benign Lesions and Healthy Tissue on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Alexandra H Besser; Lauren K Fang; Michelle W Tong; Maren M Sjaastad Andreassen; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Christopher C Conlin; Stéphane Loubrie; Tyler M Seibert; Michael E Hahn; Joshua M Kuperman; Anne M Wallace; Anders M Dale; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.

Authors:  Ashley M Mendez; Lauren K Fang; Claire H Meriwether; Summer J Batasin; Stéphane Loubrie; Ana E Rodríguez-Soto; Rebecca A Rakow-Penner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.