Literature DB >> 19629992

Magnetic resonance (MR) differential diagnosis of breast tumors using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) on 1.5-T.

Yoshito Tsushima1, Ayako Takahashi-Taketomi, Keigo Endo.   

Abstract

To review the published reports concerning the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value evaluation for the differentiation between malignant and benign breast tumors, articles were searched with the inclusion criteria: (a) a 1.5-T unit was used; (b) the diagnostic criteria were clearly stated; (c) diffusion-weighted images (DWIs) were obtained, and ADC value was calculated; (d) ADC values of breast tumors were reported with mean +/- standard deviation (SD). Meta-analysis from 12 articles revealed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-0.91) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.69-0.84), respectively, and that only the maximum b factor correlated with the mean ADC values of malignant and benign tumors, and the noncancerous breast tissue (P< 0.05,P < 0.01,P< 0.05, respectively). In conclusion, ADC evaluation is useful for the differentiation between malignant and benign breast tumors. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19629992     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  37 in total

1.  Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study.

Authors:  Pascal A T Baltzer; Anja Schäfer; Matthias Dietzel; David Grässel; Mieczyslaw Gajda; Oumar Camara; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Sofia Brandão; Luísa Nogueira; Eduarda Matos; Rita Gouveia Nunes; Hugo Alexandre Ferreira; Joana Loureiro; Isabel Ramos
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Effect of b value and pre-admission of contrast on diagnostic accuracy of 1.5-T breast DWI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Monique D Dorrius; Hildebrand Dijkstra; Matthijs Oudkerk; Paul E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diffusion-weighted imaging: determination of the best pair of b-values to discriminate breast lesions.

Authors:  L Nogueira; S Brandão; E Matos; R G Nunes; J Loureiro; H A Ferreira; I Ramos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  MRI in the differential diagnosis of primary architectural distortion detected by mammography.

Authors:  Lifang Si; Renyou Zhai; Xiaojuan Liu; Kaiyan Yang; Li Wang; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Diffusion weighted MRI and spectroscopy in invasive carcinoma of the breast at 3Tesla. Correlation with dynamic contrast enhancement and pathologic findings.

Authors:  G Boulogianni; I Chryssogonidis; A Drevelegas
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 0.471

8.  Is there any relationship between adc values of diffusion-weighted imaging and the histopathological prognostic factors of invasive ductal carcinoma?

Authors:  Hale Aydin; Bahar Guner; Isil Esen Bostanci; Zarife Melda Bulut; Bilgin Kadri Aribas; Lutfi Dogan; Mehmet Ali Gulcelik
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging to evaluate multifocal and multicentric breast cancer detected using pre-operative breast MRI.

Authors:  Sung Eun Song; Eun Kyung Park; Kyu Ran Cho; Bo Kyoung Seo; Ok Hee Woo; Seung Pil Jung; Sung Bum Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficiency values on diffusion-weighted imaging with prognostic factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  S Y Choi; Y-W Chang; H J Park; H J Kim; S S Hong; D Y Seo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.