Eun Cho1, Hye Jin Baek1,2, Filip Szczepankiewicz3, Hyo Jung An4, Eun Jung Jung5, Ho-Joon Lee6, Joonsung Lee7, Sung-Min Gho8. 1. Department of Radiology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Radiology, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju-daero, Jinju, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Klinikgatan, Sweden. 4. Department of Pathology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Republic of Korea. 6. Department of Radiology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea. 7. GE Healthcare Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 8. MR Clinical Solutions & Research Collaborations, GE Healthcare, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging plays a key role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of breast tumors. However, it remains unclear how to interpret single diffusion encoding with respect to its link with tissue microstructure. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to use tensor-valued diffusion encoding to investigate the underlying microstructure of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and evaluate its potential value in a clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI examination from July 2020 to March 2021. We reviewed the MRI of 29 patients with 30 IDCs, including analysis by diffusional variance decomposition enabled by tensor-valued diffusion encoding. The diffusion parameters of mean diffusivity (MD), total mean kurtosis (MKT), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), isotropic mean kurtosis (MKI), macroscopic fractional anisotropy (FA), and microscopic fractional anisotropy (µFA) were estimated. The parameter differences were compared between IDC and normal fibroglandular breast tissue (FGBT), as well as the association between the diffusion parameters and histopathologic items. Results: The mean value of MD in IDCs was significantly lower than that of normal FGBT (1.07±0.27 vs. 1.34±0.29, P<0.001); however, MKT, MKA, MKI, FA, and µFA were significantly higher (P<0.005). Among all the diffusion parameters, MKI was positively correlated with the tumor size on both MRI and pathological specimen (rs=0.38, P<0.05 vs. rs=0.54, P<0.01), whereas MKT had a positive correlation with the tumor size in the pathological specimen only (rs=0.47, P<0.02). In addition, the lymph node (LN) metastasis group had significantly higher MKT, MKA, and µFA compared to the metastasis negative group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Tensor-valued diffusion encoding enables a useful non-invasive method for characterizing breast cancers with information on tissue microstructures. Particularly, µFA could be a potential imaging biomarker for evaluating breast cancers prior to surgery or chemotherapy. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Background: Diffusion-weighted imaging plays a key role in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of breast tumors. However, it remains unclear how to interpret single diffusion encoding with respect to its link with tissue microstructure. The purpose of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to use tensor-valued diffusion encoding to investigate the underlying microstructure of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and evaluate its potential value in a clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed biopsy-proven breast cancer patients who underwent preoperative breast MRI examination from July 2020 to March 2021. We reviewed the MRI of 29 patients with 30 IDCs, including analysis by diffusional variance decomposition enabled by tensor-valued diffusion encoding. The diffusion parameters of mean diffusivity (MD), total mean kurtosis (MKT), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), isotropic mean kurtosis (MKI), macroscopic fractional anisotropy (FA), and microscopic fractional anisotropy (µFA) were estimated. The parameter differences were compared between IDC and normal fibroglandular breast tissue (FGBT), as well as the association between the diffusion parameters and histopathologic items. Results: The mean value of MD in IDCs was significantly lower than that of normal FGBT (1.07±0.27 vs. 1.34±0.29, P<0.001); however, MKT, MKA, MKI, FA, and µFA were significantly higher (P<0.005). Among all the diffusion parameters, MKI was positively correlated with the tumor size on both MRI and pathological specimen (rs=0.38, P<0.05 vs. rs=0.54, P<0.01), whereas MKT had a positive correlation with the tumor size in the pathological specimen only (rs=0.47, P<0.02). In addition, the lymph node (LN) metastasis group had significantly higher MKT, MKA, and µFA compared to the metastasis negative group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Tensor-valued diffusion encoding enables a useful non-invasive method for characterizing breast cancers with information on tissue microstructures. Particularly, µFA could be a potential imaging biomarker for evaluating breast cancers prior to surgery or chemotherapy. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Entities:
Keywords:
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); breast; breast cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC); tensor-valued diffusion encoding
Authors: Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-07-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Savannah C Partridge; Ali Ziadloo; Revathi Murthy; Steven W White; Sue Peacock; Peter R Eby; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance D Lehman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Colleen Bailey; Bernard Siow; Eleftheria Panagiotaki; John H Hipwell; Thomy Mertzanidou; Julie Owen; Patrycja Gazinska; Sarah E Pinder; Daniel C Alexander; David J Hawkes Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-12-21 Impact factor: 4.044