Literature DB >> 33142135

Segmentation of cellular patterns in confocal images of melanocytic lesions in vivo via a multiscale encoder-decoder network (MED-Net).

Kivanc Kose1, Alican Bozkurt2, Christi Alessi-Fox3, Melissa Gill4, Caterina Longo5, Giovanni Pellacani6, Jennifer G Dy7, Dana H Brooks8, Milind Rajadhyaksha9.   

Abstract

In-vivo optical microscopy is advancing into routine clinical practice for non-invasively guiding diagnosis and treatment of cancer and other diseases, and thus beginning to reduce the need for traditional biopsy. However, reading and analysis of the optical microscopic images are generally still qualitative, relying mainly on visual examination. Here we present an automated semantic segmentation method called "Multiscale Encoder-Decoder Network (MED-Net)" that provides pixel-wise labeling into classes of patterns in a quantitative manner. The novelty in our approach is the modeling of textural patterns at multiple scales (magnifications, resolutions). This mimics the traditional procedure for examining pathology images, which routinely starts with low magnification (low resolution, large field of view) followed by closer inspection of suspicious areas with higher magnification (higher resolution, smaller fields of view). We trained and tested our model on non-overlapping partitions of 117 reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) mosaics of melanocytic lesions, an extensive dataset for this application, collected at four clinics in the US, and two in Italy. With patient-wise cross-validation, we achieved pixel-wise mean sensitivity and specificity of 74% and 92%, respectively, with 0.74 Dice coefficient over six classes. In the scenario, we partitioned the data clinic-wise and tested the generalizability of the model over multiple clinics. In this setting, we achieved pixel-wise mean sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 94%, respectively, with 0.77 Dice coefficient. We compared MED-Net against the state-of-the-art semantic segmentation models and achieved better quantitative segmentation performance. Our results also suggest that, due to its nested multiscale architecture, the MED-Net model annotated RCM mosaics more coherently, avoiding unrealistic-fragmented annotations.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dermatology; In vivo segmentation; Melanocytic lesion; Reflectance confocal microscopy; Semantic segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33142135      PMCID: PMC7885250          DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  31 in total

1.  A Multi-scale U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Histological Images from Radical Prostatectomies.

Authors:  Jiayun Li; Karthik V Sarma; King Chung Ho; Arkadiusz Gertych; Beatrice S Knudsen; Corey W Arnold
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  CE-Net: Context Encoder Network for 2D Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Zaiwang Gu; Jun Cheng; Huazhu Fu; Kang Zhou; Huaying Hao; Yitian Zhao; Tianyang Zhang; Shenghua Gao; Jiang Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Recalibrating Fully Convolutional Networks With Spatial and Channel "Squeeze and Excitation" Blocks.

Authors:  Abhijit Guha Roy; Nassir Navab; Christian Wachinger
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Artifacts and landmarks: pearls and pitfalls for in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy of the skin using the tissue-coupled device.

Authors:  Melissa Gill; Christi Alessi-Fox; Kivanc Kose
Journal:  Dermatol Online J       Date:  2019-08-15

Review 5.  Emerging imaging technologies in dermatology: Part II: Applications and limitations.

Authors:  Samantha L Schneider; Indermeet Kohli; Iltefat H Hamzavi; M Laurin Council; Anthony M Rossi; David M Ozog
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.527

6.  UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Zongwei Zhou; Md Mahfuzur Rahman Siddiquee; Nima Tajbakhsh; Jianming Liang
Journal:  Deep Learn Med Image Anal Multimodal Learn Clin Decis Support (2018)       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 7.  Emerging trends in the epidemiology of melanoma.

Authors:  V Nikolaou; A J Stratigos
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  G Pellacani; P Pepe; A Casari; C Longo
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 9.302

9.  Multiple Resolution Residually Connected Feature Streams for Automatic Lung Tumor Segmentation From CT Images.

Authors:  Jue Jiang; Yu-Chi Hu; Chia-Ju Liu; Darragh Halpenny; Matthew D Hellmann; Joseph O Deasy; Gig Mageras; Harini Veeraraghavan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Joint Optic Disc and Cup Segmentation Based on Multi-Label Deep Network and Polar Transformation.

Authors:  Huazhu Fu; Jun Cheng; Yanwu Xu; Damon Wing Kee Wong; Jiang Liu; Xiaochun Cao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  7 in total

1.  In vivo microscopy as an adjunctive tool to guide detection, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Kevin W Bishop; Kristen C Maitland; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Jonathan T C Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 2.  Deep Learning in Biomedical Optics.

Authors:  Lei Tian; Brady Hunt; Muyinatu A Lediju Bell; Ji Yi; Jason T Smith; Marien Ochoa; Xavier Intes; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-05-20

3.  Semantic segmentation of reflectance confocal microscopy mosaics of pigmented lesions using weak labels.

Authors:  Marissa D'Alonzo; Alican Bozkurt; Christi Alessi-Fox; Melissa Gill; Dana H Brooks; Milind Rajadhyaksha; Kivanc Kose; Jennifer G Dy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deep Learning for Automated Analysis of Cellular and Extracellular Components of the Foreign Body Response in Multiphoton Microscopy Images.

Authors:  Mattia Sarti; Maria Parlani; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Antonios G Mikos; Pietro Cerveri; Stefano Casarin; Eleonora Dondossola
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-25

5.  In vivo tumor immune microenvironment phenotypes correlate with inflammation and vasculature to predict immunotherapy response.

Authors:  Aditi Sahu; Kivanc Kose; Lukas Kraehenbuehl; Candice Byers; Aliya Holland; Teguru Tembo; Anthony Santella; Anabel Alfonso; Madison Li; Miguel Cordova; Melissa Gill; Christi Fox; Salvador Gonzalez; Piyush Kumar; Amber Weiching Wang; Nicholas Kurtansky; Pratik Chandrani; Shen Yin; Paras Mehta; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Gary Peterson; Kimeil King; Stephen Dusza; Ning Yang; Shuaitong Liu; William Phillips; Pascale Guitera; Anthony Rossi; Allan Halpern; Liang Deng; Melissa Pulitzer; Ashfaq Marghoob; Chih-Shan Jason Chen; Taha Merghoub; Milind Rajadhyaksha
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Deep Learning for Basal Cell Carcinoma Detection for Reflectance Confocal Microscopy.

Authors:  Gabriele Campanella; Cristian Navarrete-Dechent; Konstantinos Liopyris; Jilliana Monnier; Saud Aleissa; Brahmteg Minhas; Alon Scope; Caterina Longo; Pascale Guitera; Giovanni Pellacani; Kivanc Kose; Allan C Halpern; Thomas J Fuchs; Manu Jain
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 7.590

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence-Based Approaches to Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Image Analysis in Dermatology.

Authors:  Ana Maria Malciu; Mihai Lupu; Vlad Mihai Voiculescu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.