Literature DB >> 33141666

Passive Cavitation Mapping by Cavitation Source Localization From Aperture-Domain Signals-Part II: Phantom and In Vivo Experiments.

Arsenii V Telichko, Taehwa Lee, Dongwoon Hyun, Sayan Mullick Chowdhury, Sunitha Bachawal, Carl D Herickhoff, Ramasamy Paulmurugan, Jeremy J Dahl.   

Abstract

Passive cavitation mapping (PCM) techniques typically utilize a time-exposure acoustic (TEA) approach, where the received radio frequency data are beamformed, squared, and integrated over time. Such PCM-TEA cavitation maps typically suffer from long-tail artifacts and poor axial resolution with pulse-echo diagnostic arrays. Here, we utilize a recently developed PCM technique based on cavitation source localization (CSL), which fits a hyperbolic function to the received cavitation wavefront. A filtering method based on the root-mean-square error (rmse) of the hyperbolic fit is utilized to filter out spurious signals. We apply a wavefront correction technique to the signals with poor fit quality to recover additional cavitation signals and improve cavitation localization. Validation of the PCM-CSL technique with rmse filtering and wavefront correction was conducted in experiments with a tissue-mimicking flow phantom and an in vivo mouse model of cancer. It is shown that the quality of the hyperbolic fit, necessary for the PCM-CSL, requires an rmse < 0.05 mm2 in order to accurately localize the cavitation sources. A detailed study of the wavefront correction technique was carried out, and it was shown that, when applied to experiments with high noise and interference from multiple cavitating microbubbles, it was capable of effectively correcting noisy wavefronts without introducing spurious cavitation sources, thereby improving the quality of the PCM-CSL images. In phantom experiments, the PCM-CSL was capable of precisely localizing sources on the therapy beam axis and off-axis sources. In vivo cavitation experiments showed that PMC-CSL showed a significant improvement over PCM-TEA and yielded acceptable localization of cavitation signals in mice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33141666      PMCID: PMC8528486          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2020.3035709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  25 in total

1.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; D May; K Ferrara
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast agents: a review.

Authors:  E Stride; N Saffari
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Passive cavitation mapping for localization and tracking of bubble dynamics.

Authors:  Miklós Gyöngy; Constantin-C Coussios
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Use of ultrasound contrast agents for gene or drug delivery in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Raffi Bekeredjian; Paul A Grayburn; Ralph V Shohet
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Microbubble contrast agents: targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-assisted drug-delivery applications.

Authors:  Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 6.  Ultrasound microbubble contrast agents: fundamentals and application to gene and drug delivery.

Authors:  Katherine Ferrara; Rachel Pollard; Mark Borden
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Acoustic emissions during 3.1 MHz ultrasound bulk ablation in vitro.

Authors:  T Douglas Mast; Vasant A Salgaonkar; Chandrapriya Karunakaran; John A Besse; Saurabh Datta; Christy K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Transcranial passive acoustic mapping with hemispherical sparse arrays using CT-based skull-specific aberration corrections: a simulation study.

Authors:  Ryan M Jones; Meaghan A O'Reilly; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Measurement and use of acoustic nonlinearity and sound speed to estimate composition of excised livers.

Authors:  C M Sehgal; G M Brown; R C Bahn; J F Greenleaf
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Ultrasound-guided delivery of microRNA loaded nanoparticles into cancer.

Authors:  Tzu-Yin Wang; Jung Woo Choe; Kanyi Pu; Rammohan Devulapally; Sunitha Bachawal; Steven Machtaler; Sayan Mullick Chowdhury; Richard Luong; Lu Tian; Butrus Khuri-Yakub; Jianghong Rao; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 9.776

View more
  2 in total

1.  Passive Cavitation Mapping by Cavitation Source Localization From Aperture-Domain Signals-Part I: Theory and Validation Through Simulations.

Authors:  Arsenii V Telichko; Taehwa Lee; Marko Jakovljevic; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 2.  Acoustic characterization of cavitation intensity: A review.

Authors:  Pengfei Wu; Xiuming Wang; Weijun Lin; Lixin Bai
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 7.491

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.