Literature DB >> 33140424

Simplified geometric representations of protein structures identify complementary interaction interfaces.

Caitlyn L McCafferty1,2,3, Edward M Marcotte1,2,3, David W Taylor1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are critical to protein function, but three-dimensional (3D) arrangements of interacting proteins have proven hard to predict, even given the identities and 3D structures of the interacting partners. Specifically, identifying the relevant pairwise interaction surfaces remains difficult, often relying on shape complementarity with molecular docking while accounting for molecular motions to optimize rigid 3D translations and rotations. However, such approaches can be computationally expensive, and faster, less accurate approximations may prove useful for large-scale prediction and assembly of 3D structures of multi-protein complexes. We asked if a reduced representation of protein geometry retains enough information about molecular properties to predict pairwise protein interaction interfaces that are tolerant of limited structural rearrangements. Here, we describe a reduced representation of 3D protein accessible surfaces on which molecular properties such as charge, hydrophobicity, and evolutionary rate can be easily mapped, implemented in the MorphProt package. Pairs of surfaces are compared to rapidly assess partner-specific potential surface complementarity. On two available benchmarks of 185 overall known protein complexes, we observe predictions comparable to other structure-based tools at correctly identifying protein interaction surfaces. Furthermore, we examined the effect of molecular motion through normal mode simulation on a benchmark receptor-ligand pair and observed no marked loss of predictive accuracy for distortions of up to 6 Å Cα-RMSD. Thus, a shape reduction of protein surfaces retains considerable information about surface complementarity, offers enhanced speed of comparison relative to more complex geometric representations, and exhibits tolerance to conformational changes.
© 2020 The Authors. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computational biology; interaction interfaces; protein structure

Year:  2020        PMID: 33140424      PMCID: PMC7855953          DOI: 10.1002/prot.26020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  53 in total

1.  Recent advances in protein-protein interaction prediction: experimental and computational methods.

Authors:  Matthew Jessulat; Sylvain Pitre; Yuan Gui; Mohsen Hooshyar; Katayoun Omidi; Bahram Samanfar; Le Hoa Tan; Md Alamgir; James Green; Frank Dehne; Ashkan Golshani
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.098

Review 2.  Interaction-site prediction for protein complexes: a critical assessment.

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Sanbo Qin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Transient protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Saliha Ece Acuner Ozbabacan; Hatice Billur Engin; Attila Gursoy; Ozlem Keskin
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 1.650

Review 4.  Review and comparative assessment of sequence-based predictors of protein-binding residues.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Energetics of protein-protein interactions: analysis of the barnase-barstar interface by single mutations and double mutant cycles.

Authors:  G Schreiber; A R Fersht
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1995-04-28       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  DockRank: ranking docked conformations using partner-specific sequence homology-based protein interface prediction.

Authors:  Li C Xue; Rafael A Jordan; Yasser El-Manzalawy; Drena Dobbs; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-10-17

7.  Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 A resolution.

Authors:  J Löwe; D Stock; B Jap; P Zwickl; W Baumeister; R Huber
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-04-28       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Updates to the Integrated Protein-Protein Interaction Benchmarks: Docking Benchmark Version 5 and Affinity Benchmark Version 2.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Iain H Moal; Anna Vangone; Brian G Pierce; Panagiotis L Kastritis; Mieczyslaw Torchala; Raphael Chaleil; Brian Jiménez-García; Paul A Bates; Juan Fernandez-Recio; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  PAIRpred: partner-specific prediction of interacting residues from sequence and structure.

Authors:  Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar Minhas; Brian J Geiss; Asa Ben-Hur
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-12-06

Review 10.  On cross-correlations, averages and noise in electron microscopy.

Authors:  Michael Radermacher; Teresa Ruiz
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 1.056

View more
  3 in total

1.  Structural basis for assembly of non-canonical small subunits into type I-C Cascade.

Authors:  Roisin E O'Brien; Inês C Santos; Daniel Wrapp; Jack P K Bravo; Evan A Schwartz; Jennifer S Brodbelt; David W Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Understanding Supramolecular Assembly of Supercharged Proteins.

Authors:  Michael I Jacobs; Prateek Bansal; Diwakar Shukla; Charles M Schroeder
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 18.728

3.  Simplified geometric representations of protein structures identify complementary interaction interfaces.

Authors:  Caitlyn L McCafferty; Edward M Marcotte; David W Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2020-11-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.