Literature DB >> 33139919

A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Dirk Sanders1,2, Enric Frago3,4, Rachel Kehoe2, Christophe Patterson2, Kevin J Gaston5.   

Abstract

Natural light cycles are being eroded over large areas of the globe by the direct emissions and sky brightening that result from sources of artificial night-time light. This is predicted to affect wild organisms, particularly because of the central role that light regimes play in determining the timing of biological activity. Although many empirical studies have reported such effects, these have focused on particular species or local communities and have thus been unable to provide a general evaluation of the overall frequency and strength of these impacts. Using a new database of published studies, we show that exposure to artificial light at night induces strong responses for physiological measures, daily activity patterns and life history traits. We found particularly strong responses with regards to hormone levels, the onset of daily activity in diurnal species and life history traits, such as the number of offspring, predation, cognition and seafinding (in turtles). So far, few studies have focused on the impact of artificial light at night on ecosystem functions. The breadth and often strength of biological impacts we reveal highlight the need for outdoor artificial night-time lighting to be limited to the places and forms-such as timing, intensity and spectrum-where it is genuinely required by the people using it to minimize ecological impacts.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33139919     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01322-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  83 in total

Review 1.  Light, time, and the physiology of biotic response to rapid climate change in animals.

Authors:  William E Bradshaw; Christina M Holzapfel
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.318

2.  Artificial light at night as a new threat to pollination.

Authors:  Eva Knop; Leana Zoller; Remo Ryser; Christopher Gerpe; Maurin Hörler; Colin Fontaine
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Low Levels of Artificial Light at Night Strengthen Top-Down Control in Insect Food Web.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Rachel Kehoe; Dave Cruse; F J Frank van Veen; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  High-intensity urban light installation dramatically alters nocturnal bird migration.

Authors:  Benjamin M Van Doren; Kyle G Horton; Adriaan M Dokter; Holger Klinck; Susan B Elbin; Andrew Farnsworth
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Artificial light at night shifts daily activity patterns but not the internal clock in the great tit (Parus major).

Authors:  Kamiel Spoelstra; Irene Verhagen; Davy Meijer; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Street lighting disturbs commuting bats.

Authors:  Emma Louise Stone; Gareth Jones; Stephen Harris
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge.

Authors:  Kevin J Gaston; Marcel E Visser; Franz Hölker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

8.  The new world atlas of artificial night sky brightness.

Authors:  Fabio Falchi; Pierantonio Cinzano; Dan Duriscoe; Christopher C M Kyba; Christopher D Elvidge; Kimberly Baugh; Boris A Portnov; Nataliya A Rybnikova; Riccardo Furgoni
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Artificially lit surface of Earth at night increasing in radiance and extent.

Authors:  Christopher C M Kyba; Theres Kuester; Alejandro Sánchez de Miguel; Kimberly Baugh; Andreas Jechow; Franz Hölker; Jonathan Bennie; Christopher D Elvidge; Kevin J Gaston; Luis Guanter
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Meta-analysis challenges a textbook example of status signalling and demonstrates publication bias.

Authors:  Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar; Shinichi Nakagawa; Moisès Sánchez-Fortún; Dominic A Martin; Sukanya Ramani; Antje Girndt; Veronika Bókony; Bart Kempenaers; András Liker; David F Westneat; Terry Burke; Julia Schroeder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  22 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Caroline T Dressler; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations.

Authors:  Douglas H Boyes; Darren M Evans; Richard Fox; Mark S Parsons; Michael J O Pocock
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 14.957

3.  Long-term exposure to artificial light at night in the wild decreases survival and growth of a coral reef fish.

Authors:  Jules Schligler; Daphne Cortese; Ricardo Beldade; Stephen E Swearer; Suzanne C Mills
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Drivers of Infectious Disease Seasonality: Potential Implications for COVID-19.

Authors:  N Kronfeld-Schor; T J Stevenson; S Nickbakhsh; E S Schernhammer; X C Dopico; T Dayan; M Martinez; B Helm
Journal:  J Biol Rhythms       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 3.182

5.  Integrated molecular and behavioural data reveal deep circadian disruption in response to artificial light at night in male Great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Maaike de Jong; Kees van Oers; Peter O'Shaughnessy; Gavin J Blackburn; Els Atema; A Christa Mateman; Pietro B D'Amelio; Lisa Trost; Michelle Bellingham; Jessica Clark; Marcel E Visser; Barbara Helm
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Lifelong exposure to artificial light at night impacts stridulation and locomotion activity patterns in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Keren Levy; Yoav Wegrzyn; Ronny Efronny; Anat Barnea; Amir Ayali
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Avoidance of different durations, colours and intensities of artificial light by adult seabirds.

Authors:  Martyna Syposz; Oliver Padget; Jay Willis; Benjamin M Van Doren; Natasha Gillies; Annette L Fayet; Matt J Wood; Aarón Alejo; Tim Guilford
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Nocturnal lighting in animal research should be replicable and reflect relevant ecological conditions.

Authors:  Anne E Aulsebrook; Andreas Jechow; Annette Krop-Benesch; Christopher C M Kyba; Travis Longcore; Elizabeth K Perkin; Roy H A van Grunsven
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  A meta-analysis of impacts of immune response and infection on oxidative status in vertebrates.

Authors:  David Costantini
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators.

Authors:  Emmanuelle S Briolat; Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Emma J Rosenfeld; Jolyon Troscianko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.