Literature DB >> 30057304

Low Levels of Artificial Light at Night Strengthen Top-Down Control in Insect Food Web.

Dirk Sanders1, Rachel Kehoe2, Dave Cruse3, F J Frank van Veen2, Kevin J Gaston3.   

Abstract

Artificial light has transformed the nighttime environment of large areas of the earth, with 88% of Europe and almost 50% of the United States experiencing light-polluted night skies [1]. The consequences for ecosystems range from exposure to high light intensities in the vicinity of direct light sources to the very widespread but lower lighting levels further away [2]. While it is known that species exhibit a range of physiological and behavioral responses to artificial nighttime lighting [e.g., 3-5], there is a need to gain a mechanistic understanding of whole ecological community impacts [6, 7], especially to different light intensities. Using a mesocosm field experiment with insect communities, we determined the impact of intensities of artificial light ranging from 0.1 to 100 lux on different trophic levels and interactions between species. Strikingly, we found the strongest impact at low levels of artificial lighting (0.1 to 5 lux), which led to a 1.8 times overall reduction in aphid densities. Mechanistically, artificial light at night increased the efficiency of parasitoid wasps in attacking aphids, with twice the parasitism rate under low light levels compared to unlit controls. However, at higher light levels, parasitoid wasps spent longer away from the aphid host plants, diminishing this increased efficiency. Therefore, aphids reached higher densities under increased light intensity as compared to low levels of lighting, where they were limited by higher parasitoid efficiency. Our study highlights the importance of different intensities of artificial light in driving the strength of species interactions and ecosystem functions.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aphids; food webs; light pollution; parasitism rate; parasitoids

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30057304     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  10 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of biological impacts of artificial light at night.

Authors:  Dirk Sanders; Enric Frago; Rachel Kehoe; Christophe Patterson; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems.

Authors:  Jack Falcón; Alicia Torriglia; Dina Attia; Françoise Viénot; Claude Gronfier; Francine Behar-Cohen; Christophe Martinsons; David Hicks
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Street lighting has detrimental impacts on local insect populations.

Authors:  Douglas H Boyes; Darren M Evans; Richard Fox; Mark S Parsons; Michael J O Pocock
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 14.957

4.  Artificial light at night as an environmental pollutant: An integrative approach across taxa, biological functions, and scientific disciplines.

Authors:  Davide M Dominoni; Randy J Nelson
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Integr Physiol       Date:  2018-10

Review 5.  The impact of artificial light at night on nocturnal insects: A review and synthesis.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Artificial light at night at the terrestrial-aquatic interface: Effects on predators and fluxes of insect prey.

Authors:  Elizabeth Parkinson; Justine Lawson; Scott D Tiegs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Lifelong exposure to artificial light at night impacts stridulation and locomotion activity patterns in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Keren Levy; Yoav Wegrzyn; Ronny Efronny; Anat Barnea; Amir Ayali
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Artificial light impacts the mate success of female fireflies.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.653

9.  Transcriptional Response of Circadian Clock Genes to an 'Artificial Light at Night' Pulse in the Cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Keren Levy; Bettina Fishman; Anat Barnea; Amir Ayali; Eran Tauber
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Shifting daylength regimes associated with range shifts alter aphid-parasitoid community dynamics.

Authors:  Rachel C Kehoe; David Cruse; Dirk Sanders; Kevin J Gaston; F J Frank van Veen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.