Literature DB >> 35650413

Costs and benefits of "insect friendly" artificial lights are taxon specific.

Avalon C S Owens1, Caroline T Dressler2,3, Sara M Lewis2.   

Abstract

The expansion of human activity into natural habitats often results in the introduction of artificial light at night, which can disrupt local ecosystems. Recent advances in LED technology have enabled spectral tuning of artificial light sources, which could in theory limit their impact on vulnerable taxa. To date, however, experimental comparisons of ecologically friendly candidate colors have often considered only one type of behavioral impact, sometimes on only single species. Resulting recommendations cannot be broadly implemented if their consequences for other local taxa are unknown. Working at a popular firefly ecotourism site, we exposed the insect community to artificial illumination of three colors (blue, broad-spectrum amber, red) and measured flight-to-light behavior as well as the courtship flash behavior of male Photinus carolinus fireflies. Firefly courtship activity was greatest under blue and red lights, while the most flying insects were attracted to blue and broad-spectrum amber lights. Thus, while impacts of spectrally tuned artificial light varied across taxa, our results suggest that red light, rather than amber light, is least disruptive to insects overall, and therefore more generally insect friendly.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecotourism; Flight-to-light; Lampyridae; Light pollution; Spectral tuning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35650413     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05189-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  52 in total

1.  Tuning of photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae).

Authors:  T W Cronin; M Järvilehto; M Weckström; A B Lall
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Is part-night lighting an effective measure to limit the impacts of artificial lighting on bats?

Authors:  Clémentine Azam; Christian Kerbiriou; Arthur Vernet; Jean-François Julien; Yves Bas; Laura Plichard; Julie Maratrat; Isabelle Le Viol
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Multiple night-time light-emitting diode lighting strategies impact grassland invertebrate assemblages.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Dave Cruse; Dan Blumgart; Richard Inger; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Street lighting: sex-independent impacts on moth movement.

Authors:  Tobias Degen; Oliver Mitesser; Elizabeth K Perkin; Nina-Sophie Weiß; Martin Oehlert; Emily Mattig; Franz Hölker
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Why artificial light at night should be a focus for global change research in the 21st century.

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Tim Smyth
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 10.863

6.  Colour vision in the glow-worm Lampyris noctiluca (L.) (Coleoptera: Lampyridae): evidence for a green-blue chromatic mechanism.

Authors:  David Booth; Alan J A Stewart; Daniel Osorio
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Red Sea corals under Artificial Light Pollution at Night (ALAN) undergo oxidative stress and photosynthetic impairment.

Authors:  Inbal Ayalon; Laura F de Barros Marangoni; Jennifer I C Benichou; Dror Avisar; Oren Levy
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Artificial nighttime lighting impacts visual ecology links between flowers, pollinators and predators.

Authors:  Emmanuelle S Briolat; Kevin J Gaston; Jonathan Bennie; Emma J Rosenfeld; Jolyon Troscianko
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Artificial light pollution: are shifting spectral signatures changing the balance of species interactions?

Authors:  Thomas W Davies; Jonathan Bennie; Richard Inger; Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Pollination and fruit infestation under artificial light at night:light colour matters.

Authors:  Michiel P Boom; Kamiel Spoelstra; Arjen Biere; Eva Knop; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Artificial light impacts the mate success of female fireflies.

Authors:  Avalon C S Owens; Sara M Lewis
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.653

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.