Literature DB >> 33139481

The Context-Dependent Influence of Promoter Sequence Motifs on Transcription Initiation Kinetics and Regulation.

Drake Jensen1, Eric A Galburt2.   

Abstract

The fitness of an individual bacterial cell is highly dependent upon the temporal tuning of gene expression levels when subjected to different environmental cues. Kinetic regulation of transcription initiation is a key step in modulating the levels of transcribed genes to promote bacterial survival. The initiation phase encompasses the binding of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to promoter DNA and a series of coupled protein-DNA conformational changes prior to entry into processive elongation. The time required to complete the initiation phase can vary by orders of magnitude and is ultimately dictated by the DNA sequence of the promoter. In this review, we aim to provide the required background to understand how promoter sequence motifs may affect initiation kinetics during promoter recognition and binding, subsequent conformational changes which lead to DNA opening around the transcription start site, and promoter escape. By calculating the steady-state flux of RNA production as a function of these effects, we illustrate that the presence/absence of a consensus promoter motif cannot be used in isolation to make conclusions regarding promoter strength. Instead, the entire series of linked, sequence-dependent structural transitions must be considered holistically. Finally, we describe how individual transcription factors take advantage of the broad distribution of sequence-dependent basal kinetics to either increase or decrease RNA flux.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Keywords:  RNA polymerase; gene regulation; kinetics; promoter motifs; transcription initiation

Year:  2021        PMID: 33139481      PMCID: PMC8088511          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00512-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  227 in total

1.  Generality of the branched pathway in transcription initiation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Motoki Susa; Ranjan Sen; Nobuo Shimamoto
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates.

Authors:  Ruth M Saecker; Oleg V Tsodikov; Kristi L McQuade; Peter E Schlax; Michael W Capp; M Thomas Record
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-06-07       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Initial transcribed sequence mutations specifically affect promoter escape properties.

Authors:  Lilian M Hsu; Ingrid M Cobb; Jillian R Ozmore; Maureen Khoo; Grace Nahm; Lulin Xia; Yeran Bao; Colette Ahn
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Activation and repression of transcription by differential contact: two sides of a coin.

Authors:  S Roy; S Garges; S Adhya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1998-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Different types of pausing modes during transcription initiation.

Authors:  Eitan Lerner; Antonino Ingargiola; Jookyung J Lee; Sergei Borukhov; Xavier Michalet; Shimon Weiss
Journal:  Transcription       Date:  2017-03-23

6.  Stepwise Promoter Melting by Bacterial RNA Polymerase.

Authors:  James Chen; Courtney Chiu; Saumya Gopalkrishnan; Albert Y Chen; Paul Dominic B Olinares; Ruth M Saecker; Jared T Winkelman; Michael F Maloney; Brian T Chait; Wilma Ross; Richard L Gourse; Elizabeth A Campbell; Seth A Darst
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Essential structure of E. coli promoter: effect of spacer length between the two consensus sequences on promoter function.

Authors:  T Aoyama; M Takanami; E Ohtsuka; Y Taniyama; R Marumoto; H Sato; M Ikehara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-09-10       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  An intersubunit contact stimulating transcription initiation by E coli RNA polymerase: interaction of the alpha C-terminal domain and sigma region 4.

Authors:  Wilma Ross; David A Schneider; Brian J Paul; Aaron Mertens; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 9.  Monitoring abortive initiation.

Authors:  Lilian M Hsu
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  Cycling of ribonucleic acid polymerase to produce oligonucleotides during initiation in vitro at the lac UV5 promoter.

Authors:  A J Carpousis; J D Gralla
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1980-07-08       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  4 in total

1.  Structural origins of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase open promoter complex stability.

Authors:  Ruth M Saecker; James Chen; Courtney E Chiu; Brandon Malone; Johanna Sotiris; Mark Ebrahim; Laura Y Yen; Edward T Eng; Seth A Darst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Quantifying the regulatory role of individual transcription factors in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Sunil Guharajan; Shivani Chhabra; Vinuselvi Parisutham; Robert C Brewster
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Genetic engineering for enhanced production of a novel alkaline protease BSP-1 in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens.

Authors:  Cong Jiang; Changwen Ye; Yongfeng Liu; Kuo Huang; Xuedeng Jiang; Dian Zou; Lu Li; Wenyuan Han; Xuetuan Wei
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-30

4.  Rhodobacter sphaeroides CarD Negatively Regulates Its Own Promoter.

Authors:  Kemardo K Henry; Wilma Ross; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.490

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.