Literature DB >> 12054861

Kinetic studies and structural models of the association of E. coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase with the lambdaP(R) promoter: large scale conformational changes in forming the kinetically significant intermediates.

Ruth M Saecker1, Oleg V Tsodikov, Kristi L McQuade, Peter E Schlax, Michael W Capp, M Thomas Record.   

Abstract

The kinetics of interaction of Esigma(70) RNA polymerase (R) with the lambdaP(R) promoter (P) were investigated by filter binding over a broad range of temperatures (7.3-42 degrees C) and concentrations of RNA polymerase (1-123 nM) in large excess over promoter DNA. Under all conditions examined, the kinetics of formation of competitor-resistant complexes (I(2), RP(o)) are single-exponential with first order rate constant beta(CR). Interpretation of the polymerase concentration dependence of beta(CR) in terms of the three step mechanism of open complex formation yields the equilibrium constant K(1) for formation of the first kinetically significant intermediate (I(1)) and the forward rate constant (k(2)) for the conformational change converting I(1) to the second kinetically significant intermediate I(2): R + P-->(K(1))<--I(1)(k(2))-->I(2). Use of rapid quench mixing allows K(1) and k(2) to be individually determined over the entire temperature range investigated, previously not possible at this promoter using manual mixing. Given the large (>60 bp) interface formed in I(1), its relatively small binding constant K(1) at 37 degrees C at this [salt] (approximately 6 x 10(6) M(-1)) strongly argues that binding free energy is used to drive large-scale structural changes in polymerase and/or promoter DNA or other coupled processes. Evidence for coupling of protein folding is provided by the large and negative activation heat capacity of k(a)[DeltaC(o,++)(a)= -1.5(+/-0.2)kcal K(-1)], now shown to originate directly from formation of I(1) [DeltaC(o)(1)= -1.4(+/-0.3)kcal K(-1)] rather than from the formation of I(2) as previously proposed. The isomerization I(1)-->I(2) exhibits relatively slow kinetics and has a very large temperature-independent Arrhenius activation energy [E(act)(2)= 34(+/-2)kcal]. This kinetic signature suggests that formation of the transition state (I(1)-I(2)++ involves large conformational changes dominated by changes in the exposure of polar and/or charged surface to water. Structural and biochemical data lead to the following hypotheses to interpret these results. We propose that formation of I(1) involves coupled folding of unstructured regions of polymerase (beta, beta' and sigma(70)) and bending of promoter DNA (in the -10 region). We propose that interactions with region 2 of sigma(70) and possibly domain 1 of beta induce a kink at the -11/-12 base pairs of the lambdaP(R) promoter which places the downstream DNA (-5 to +20) in the jaws of the beta and beta' subunits of polymerase in I(1). These early interactions of beta and beta' with the DNA downstream of position -5 trigger jaw closing (with coupled folding) and subsequent steps of DNA opening. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12054861     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00293-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  61 in total

1.  Asynchronous basepair openings in transcription initiation: CRP enhances the rate-limiting step.

Authors:  Siddhartha Roy; Heon Man Lim; Mofang Liu; Sankar Adhya
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2004-02-12       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Structural basis for promoter-10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase σ subunit.

Authors:  Andrey Feklistov; Seth A Darst
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  The Bordetella pertussis model of exquisite gene control by the global transcription factor BvgA.

Authors:  Kimberly B Decker; Tamara D James; Scott Stibitz; Deborah M Hinton
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  One-step DNA melting in the RNA polymerase cleft opens the initiation bubble to form an unstable open complex.

Authors:  Theodore J Gries; Wayne S Kontur; Michael W Capp; Ruth M Saecker; M Thomas Record
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The transcription inhibitor lipiarmycin blocks DNA fitting into the RNA polymerase catalytic site.

Authors:  Audrey Tupin; Maxime Gualtieri; Jean-Paul Leonetti; Konstantin Brodolin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Sequence-independent upstream DNA-alphaCTD interactions strongly stimulate Escherichia coli RNA polymerase-lacUV5 promoter association.

Authors:  Wilma Ross; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The effects of upstream DNA on open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Caroline A Davis; Michael W Capp; M Thomas Record; Ruth M Saecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Real-time characterization of intermediates in the pathway to open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase at the T7A1 promoter.

Authors:  Bianca Sclavi; Evgeny Zaychikov; Anastasia Rogozina; Ferdinand Walther; Malcolm Buckle; Hermann Heumann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  DksA potentiates direct activation of amino acid promoters by ppGpp.

Authors:  Brian J Paul; Melanie B Berkmen; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-05-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Analysis of RNA polymerase-promoter complex formation.

Authors:  Wilma Ross; Richard L Gourse
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.