| Literature DB >> 33138334 |
Soukaina Hrichi1, Raja Chaabane-Banaoues2, Sihem Bayar3, Guido Flamini4,5, Yassine Oulad El Majdoub6, Domenica Mangraviti6, Luigi Mondello6,7,8,9, Ridha El Mzoughi3, Hamouda Babba2, Zine Mighri1, Francesco Cacciola10.
Abstract
Scarce information about the phenolic composition of Scabiosa atropurpurea L. is available, and no carotenoid compounds have been reported thus far. In this study the phenolic and carotenoid composition of this plant was both investigated and associated bioactivities were evaluated. Aiming to obtain extracts and volatile fractions of known medicinal plants to valorize them in the pharmaceutical or food industries, two techniques of extraction and five solvents were used to determine the biologically active compounds. Gas chromatography coupled to flame ionization and mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode array and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry highlighted the presence of 15 volatiles, 19 phenolic, and 24 natural pigments in Scabiosa atropurpurea L. stem samples; among them, the most abundant were 1,8-cineole, chlorogenic acid, cynaroside, and lutein. Bioactivity was assessed by a set of in vitro tests checking for antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, and allelopathic (against Brassica oleracea L. and Lens culinaris Medik) effects. Scabiosa atropurpurea L. stem extracts presented a considerable antioxidant, antibacterial, and allelopathic potential, with less antifungal effectiveness. These results indicate that the volatile fractions and extracts from S. atropurpurea L. stem could be considered as a good source of bioactive agents, with possible applications in food-related, agriculture, and pharmaceutical fields. Genetic investigations showed 97% of similarity with Scabiosa tschiliensis, also called Japanese Scabiosa.Entities:
Keywords: GC; HPLC; Scabiosa atropurpurea L.; allelopathic; antibacterial; antifungal; antioxidant; carotenoids; mass spectrometry; phenols
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138334 PMCID: PMC7684468 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Neighbor-Joining (NJ) tree analysis of Scabiosa and closely related species inferred from the petN-psbM intergenic region was constructed using Mega, with Prunus armeniaca L. as Outgroup. Bootstrap value with 1000 replicates.
S. atropurpurea L. stem volatile fraction and extract yield using different solvents.
| Name | Extraction Method | Solvent | wt% ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Hydro-distillation | Hexane | 0.032 ± 0.002 |
|
| Hydro-distillation | Chloroform | 0.012 ± 0.001 |
|
| Hot-extraction | Dichloromethane | 1.036 ± 0.021 |
|
| Hot-extraction | Chloroform | 0.972 ± 0.008 |
|
| Hot-extraction | Ethyl acetate | 0.834 ± 0.015 |
|
| Hot-extraction | Ethanol | 1.132 ± 0.062 |
wt% ± SD: percentage ± standard deviation.
Chemical composition of volatile fractions from S. atropurpurea L. stem, identified by GC-FID/MS.
| Compound | L.R.I. | Concentration (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| VF1 | VF2 | ||
| 1,8-cineole | 1034 | 8.1 | 33.8 |
| 1076 | 1.6 | 3.0 | |
| 1090 | n.d. | 2.4 | |
| Linalool | 1101 | 4.9 | 3.3 |
| α-terpineol | 1191 | 2.3 | n.d. |
| Dihydrolinalylacetate | 1275 | n.d. | 2.5 |
| 2-hydroxy-5-methylacetophenone | 1315 | 4.4 | 2.9 |
| Eugenol | 1358 | 3.6 | n.d. |
| 1382 | 6.4 | 3.0 | |
|
|
|
| 5.7 |
| 1395 | 5.6 | n.d. | |
| β-caryophyllene | 1419 | n.d. | 2.2 |
| 1455 | 9.1 | 3.0 | |
|
|
|
| 5.9 |
|
|
| n.d. |
|
| Oxygenated monoterpenes | - | 16.9 | 45.0 |
| Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons | - | 0.0 | 2.2 |
| Apocarotenes | - | 36.2 | 38.0 |
| Phenyl propanoids | - | 3.6 | 0.0 |
| Other derivatives | - | 34.1 | 8.6 |
| % peaks identified | - | 90.8 | 93.8 |
| Total yield% (mg 100 g−1) | - | 0.032 | 0.012 |
The dominant compounds are indicated in bold. L.R.I.: linear retention index reported in the literature using the same GC stationary phase. VF1; volatile fraction extracted by hexane, VF2; volatile fraction extracted by chloroform. n.d.: not detected.
Figure 2Phenolic profiles of S. atropurpurea L. stem extracts obtained by HPLC-PDA analysis, (A); dichloromethane extract, (B); chloroform extract, (C); ethyl acetate extract, (D); ethanol extract.
Identification and quantification of the phenolic compounds in S. atropurpurea L. stem extracts by HPLC-PDA-ESI/MS.
| Peak No | Rt (min) | λmax | [M − H]− | Identification | Formula | Quantification (µg g−1 Extract (ppm) | Ref | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCM | Chl | EtOAc | EtOH | |||||||
| 1 | 15.56 | 243, 325 | 353, 191 |
| C16H18O9 | 14.81 | 6.08 | 87.99 |
| [ |
| 2 | 16.73 | 240, 321 | 179 | Caffeic acid | C9H8O4 | 2.57 | 5.92 | 130.16 | 45.98 | [ |
| 3 | 19.42 | 208, 227, 279, 309 | 151 | Vanillin | C8H8O3 | 64.67 | 104.11 | n.d. | n.d. | [ |
| 4 | 19.86 | 235, 279, 375 | 163 | C9H8O3 | n.d. | n.d. | 16.49 | n.d. | [ | |
| 5 | 21.98 | 235, 309 | 163 | C9H8O3 | 4.37 | 14.50 | 24.23 | 8.33 | [ | |
| 6 | 22.43 | 212, 270, 336 | 609, 367, 179 | Unknown | - | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | - | - |
| 7 | 23.52 | 237, 285 | 485, 453, 403 | Unknown | - | n.d. | n.d. | - | n.d. | - |
| 8 | 25.45 | 231, 258, 268, 349 | 285, 447 |
| C21H20O11 | 39.79 | 71.22 | 199.97 |
| [ |
| 9 | 25.98 | 243,348 | 464 | Isoquercitrin | C21H20O12 | n.d. | n.d. | 108.72 | 205.57 | [ |
| 10 | 28.59 | 240, 340 | 431 | Hyperoside | C21H20O12 | n.d. | n.d. | 37.58 | 36.13 | [ |
| 11 | 28.88 | 214, 273, 339 | 579, 455 | Unknown | - | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | - | |
| 12 | 29.36 | 254, 345 | 463 | Quercimeritrin | C21H20O12 | n.d. | n.d. | 36.05 | 81.36 | [ |
| 13 | 29.64 | 253, 347 | 447 |
| C21H20O11 | n.d. | n.d. | 467.06 |
| [ |
| 14 | 32.57 | 269 | 579 | Syringaresinol hexoside | C28H36O13 | LOQ | LOQ | n.d. | n.d. | [ |
| 15 | 32.68 | 215, 326 | 515 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer 1 | C25H24O12 | n.d. | n.d. | 46.18 | 224.38 | [ |
| 16 | 34.21 | 214, 335 | 615, 555, 447 | Unknown | - | n.d. | n.d. | n.d. | - | - |
| 17 | 34.65 | 218, 327 | 515 | Dicaffeoylquinic acid isomer 2 | C25H24O12 | n.d. | n.d. | 31.22 | 213.63 | [ |
| 18 | 39.51 | 241, 347 | 285 | Luteolin | C15H10O6 | n.d. | n.d. | 113.66 | 11.14 | [ |
| 19 | 49.15 | 242, 268, 334 | 537, 329, 141 | Unknown | - | n.d. | n.d. | - | n.d. | - |
| Total of phenolic compounds (µg g−1) | 129.15 | 201.83 | 1299.31 | 2790.47 | ||||||
DCM; Dichloromethane extract, Chl; Chloroform extract, EtOAc; Ethyl acetate extract, EtOH; Ethanol extract. The dominant compounds are indicated in bold. n.d.: not detected. LOQ, the limit of quantification. Rt: retention time; [M + H]+: protonated molecule; λmax: ultraviolet absorption maxima.
Figure 3Pigment profiles of different extracts of S. atropurpurea L. stem obtained by HPLC-PDA analysis, (A); dichloromethane extract, (B); chloroform extract, (C); ethyl acetate extract, and (D); ethanol extract.
Pigment compounds identified in the extracts from S. atropurpurea L. stem by HPLC-PDA-APCI/MS.
| N° | Rt (min) | λ max(nm) | [M + H]+ | [M − H]- | Compounds | Formula | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.3 | 268 | 409 | - | 4,4′-diapophytoene | C30H48 | [ |
| 2 | 3.5 | 530, 604, 658, | 617 | - | Chlorophyllide a | C35H34MgN4O5 | [ |
| 3 | 6.4 | 281, 314, 421,434, 658 | 613 | - | Chlorophyll c | C35H32MgN4O5 | - |
| 4 | 7.3 | 229, 279, 407, 504, 667 | 696, 609 | 712, 607 | Unknown | - | - |
| 5 | 8.1 | 238, 266, 401, 498, 667 | 625 | - | Actinioerythrin | C40H48O6 | [ |
| 6 | 9.05 | 232, 322, 407, 504, 666 | 637, 619 | 635, 389 | Unknown | - | - |
| 7 | 10.6 | 232, 331, 372, 437, 657 | 607 | 605 | Pheophorbide b | C35H34 N4O6 | [ |
| 8 | 11.6 | 415, 437, 464 | 551 | 568 | Isomer lutein | C40H56O2 | [ |
| 9 | 12.3 | 274, 340, 425, 507, 658 | 593 | 592 | Pheophorbide a | C35H36N4O5 | [ |
| 10 | 14.0 | 422, 444, 473 | 551 | 568 | Lutein | C40H56O2 | [ |
| 11 | 16.7 | 231, 409, 448, 467, 668 | 622 | 620 | Unknown | - | - |
| 12 | 19.0 | 416, 438, 467, | 551 | - | Echinenone | C40H54O | [ |
| 13 | 23.5 | 233, 269, 415, 438, 468 | 873, 765, 654 | 763, 652 | Unknown | - | - |
| 14 | 26.4 | 409, 507, 667 | 535 | 534 | Torulene | C40H54 | [ |
| 15 | 33.5 | 297, 326, 370, 436, 661 | 893 | - | Chlorophyll a | C55H72MgN4O5 | [ |
| 16 | 37.7 | 227, 279, 407, 504, 667 | 908, 887, 682 | 886, 680 | Chlorophyll b | C55H70MgN4O6 | [ |
| 18 | 39.9 | 282, 279, 407, 499, 504, 667 | 903 | 902 | Unknown | - | - |
| 18 | 43.14 | 331, 373, 437, 529, 661 | 885, 827 | 884, 826 | Pheophytin b | C55H72N4O6 | [ |
| 19 | 45.77 | 331, 371, 432, 441, 657 | 885, 827 | 884, 826 | Pheophytin b | C55H72N4O6 | [ |
| 20 | 47.5 | 276, 408, 507, 538, 667 | - | 870 | Pheophytin a | C55H74N4O5 | [ |
| 21 | 48.9 | 275, 340, 425, 507, 658 | 872 | 870 | Pheophytin a | C55H74N4O5 | [ |
| 22 | 53.4 | 428, 452, 478 | 537 | - | C40H56 | [ | |
| 23 | 55. 8 | 417, 444, 472 | 537 | - | 9- | C40H56 | [ |
| 24 | 58.15 | 412, 436, 507, 544, 663 | 827 | 826 | Unknown | - | - |
Rt: retention time; [M + H]+: protonated molecule; λmax: ultraviolet absorption maxima.
Quantification of carotenoid compounds in stem extracts of the species S. atropurpurea L.
| Compounds | µg g−1Extract (ppm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dichloromethane | Chloroform | Ethyl Acetate | Ethanol | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Actinioerythrin | 18.85 | 14.28 | n.d. | n.d. |
| Isomer lutein | 27.55 | 16.78 | n.d. | n.d. |
|
|
|
|
| n.d. |
| Echinenone | 32.20 | 17.90 | 3.90 | n.d. |
| Torulene | 11.22 | 6.70 | n.d. | n.d. |
|
|
|
|
| n.d. |
| 9- | 15.52 | 5.61 | 2.55 | n.d. |
| Total | 637.19 | 342.93 | 143.10 | 476.31 |
n.d.: not detected. The dominant compounds are indicated in bold.
Figure 4Antioxidant capacity of volatile and non-volatile metabolites of S. atropurpurea L stem; Dichloromethane extract; Chloroform extract; ethyl acetate extract; ethanol extract; VF1; VF2; Ascorbic acid.
The relative antioxidant ability of different extracts and the volatile fractions of S. atropurpurea L. to reduce the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) in the DPPH radical-scavenging activity assay.
| Sample | IC50 mg mL−1 |
|---|---|
| Dichloromethane extract | 2.7085 ± 0.4296 |
| Chloroform extract | 2.0951 ± 0.3750 |
| Ethyl acetate extract | 0.4806 ± 0.0487 |
| Ethanol extract | 0.1383 ± 0.0789 |
| VF 1 | 0.4798 ± 0.0897 |
| VF 2 | 1.2944 ± 0.2067 |
| Ascorbic acid | 0.0840 ± 0.0103 |
MICs and MBC/MFCs values (mg mL−1) of extracts and volatile fractions of S. atropurpurea L. stem on fungal and bacterial agents.
| Test Sample and Standard | Gram-Negative Bacteria | Gram-Positive Bacteria | Yeasts | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MBC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | MIC | MFC | |
| E1 | 50 | N.A. | 0.78 | 1.56 | 50 | N.A. | 50 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| E2 | 12.5 | 50 | 0.78 | 3.12 | N.A. | N.A. | 50 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| E3 | 25 | N.A. | 12.25 | 25 | 50 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | 50 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| E4 | 50 | N.A. | 25 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | 6.25 | 25 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| VF1 | 1.5 | N.A. | 0.75 | 1.5 | N.A. | N.A. | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| VF2 | 0.22 | 0.87 | 1.5 | N.A. | 3.5 | 3.5 | 1.75 | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| Gentamicin | 0.004 | 0.256 | 0.128 | 0.128 | 0.002 | 0.128 | 0.256 | 0.512 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Amphotericine B | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.0025 | 0.0025 |
N.A.: non-active.
Figure 5Allelopathic effects of dichloromethane (DCM), Chloroform (Chl), Ethyl acetate (EtOAc), and ethanol (EtOH) extracts from S. atropurpurea L. stem on the germination (A,B), shoot length (C,D), root length (E,F), and hydration (G,H) of Lens culinaris Medik. (lens) and Brassica oleracea gongylodes (kohlrabi). Significant difference, one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05.