Literature DB >> 18450446

Young children do not integrate visual and haptic form information.

Monica Gori1, Michela Del Viva, Giulio Sandini, David C Burr.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown that adults integrate visual and haptic information (and information from other modalities) in a statistically optimal fashion, weighting each sense according to its reliability [1, 2]. When does this capacity for crossmodal integration develop? Here, we show that prior to 8 years of age, integration of visual and haptic spatial information is far from optimal, with either vision or touch dominating totally, even in conditions in which the dominant sense is far less precise than the other (assessed by discrimination thresholds). For size discrimination, haptic information dominates in determining both perceived size and discrimination thresholds, whereas for orientation discrimination, vision dominates. By 8-10 years, the integration becomes statistically optimal, like adults. We suggest that during development, perceptual systems require constant recalibration, for which cross-sensory comparison is important. Using one sense to calibrate the other precludes useful combination of the two sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18450446     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  136 in total

Review 1.  Some behavioral and neurobiological constraints on theories of audiovisual speech integration: a review and suggestions for new directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Altieri; David B Pisoni; James T Townsend
Journal:  Seeing Perceiving       Date:  2011-09-29

2.  The development of audiovisual multisensory integration across childhood and early adolescence: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  Alice B Brandwein; John J Foxe; Natalie N Russo; Ted S Altschuler; Hilary Gomes; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Visual information gleaned by observing grasping movement in allocentric and egocentric perspectives.

Authors:  Francesco Campanella; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Multisensory calibration is independent of cue reliability.

Authors:  Adam Zaidel; Amanda H Turner; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Crossmodal enhancement in the LOC for visuohaptic object recognition over development.

Authors:  R Joanne Jao; Thomas W James; Karin Harman James
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Multisensory integration compensates loss of sensitivity of visual temporal order in the elderly.

Authors:  Liselotte de Boer-Schellekens; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Crossmodal processing.

Authors:  Charles Spence; Daniel Senkowski; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Adult plasticity in multisensory neurons: short-term experience-dependent changes in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  Liping Yu; Barry E Stein; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The development of Bayesian integration in sensorimotor estimation.

Authors:  Claire Chambers; Taegh Sokhey; Deborah Gaebler-Spira; Konrad Paul Kording
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Motor commands in children interfere with their haptic perception of objects.

Authors:  Monica Gori; Valentina Squeri; Alessandra Sciutti; Lorenzo Masia; Giulio Sandini; Jürgen Konczak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.