Literature DB >> 33133413

Translation and Validation of Forgotten Joint Score for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Indian Population.

Siddharth S Sethy1, Tarun Goyal2, Souvik Paul1, S Lakshmana Das1, Arghya Kundu Choudhury1, Roop Bhushan Kalia1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ultimate success of a total hip replacement lies in patients forgetting about their artificial joints during routine activities. "Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)" is emerging as an important tool in assessing outcomes of total hip arthroplasty. There has been no version of this score available in commonly spoken vernaculars in India. This study aims to formulate and validate the Hindi version of FJS in Indian population.
METHODS: A total of 136 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months and a maximum follow-up of 18 months after total hip arthroplasty were asked to fill the translated and adapted version of FJS questionnaire, at two points of time 2 weeks apart. The Hindi version of FJS (I-FJS) was tested for reliability and responsiveness, floor and ceiling effect and validity against modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Construct validity was expressed as the Pearson correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was expressed as Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability as the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: I-FJS showed excellent internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of 0.88. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.94. I-FJS showed good correlation with m-HHS (r = 0.8, p = 0.001). The standard error of measurement was 3.6 and the smallest detectable change was 9.97. There was no floor or ceiling effect observed with I-FJS. Data from this study were insufficient to establish adequate responsiveness of I-FJS.
CONCLUSION: I-FJS is a valid, reliable and reproducible score for hip function in post-THA patients. It is devoid of any floor or ceiling effect. Hindi version of FJS could be an effective tool for studying hip function in the Indian population. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forgotten Joint Score; Functional outcomes; Harris hip score; Patient-reported outcome; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2020        PMID: 33133413      PMCID: PMC7573040          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00228-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  33 in total

1.  A new high-flexion knee scoring system to eliminate the ceiling effect.

Authors:  Sang-Eun Na; Chul-Won Ha; Choong-Hee Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  P N Baker; J H van der Meulen; J Lewsey; P J Gregg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-07

3.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Measuring improvement following total hip and knee arthroplasty using patient-based measures of outcome.

Authors:  Robert G Marx; Edward C Jones; Nawal C Atwan; Robert F Closkey; Eduardo A Salvati; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure.

Authors:  Wen-Shian Lu; Chun-Hou Wang; Jao-Hong Lin; Ching-Fan Sheu; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments.

Authors:  L B Mokkink; C B Terwee; D L Knol; P W Stratford; J Alonso; D L Patrick; L M Bouter; H C W de Vet
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  What makes patients aware of their artificial knee joint?

Authors:  F L Loth; M C Liebensteiner; J M Giesinger; K Giesinger; H R Bliem; B Holzner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Evaluation of Forgotten Joint Score in total hip arthroplasty with Oxford Hip Score as reference standard.

Authors:  Amanda Larsson; Ola Rolfson; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  The Forgotten Joint Score-12 in Swedish patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a validation study with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) as comparator.

Authors:  Siri Heijbel; Josefine E Naili; Axel Hedin; Annette W-Dahl; Kjell G Nilsson; Margareta Hedström
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  2 in total

1.  Content Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Forgotten Joint Score Questionnaire in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Seyed Peyman Mirghaderi; Amirhossein Ghaseminejad Raeini; Hediye Gholamshahi; Seyed Mohammad Javad Mortazavi; Seyyed Hossein Shafiei; Mehrdad Sheikhvatan
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Influence of Depression and Sleep Quality on Postoperative Outcomes after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Umile Giuseppe Longo; Sergio De Salvatore; Alessandra Greco; Martina Marino; Giulia Santamaria; Ilaria Piergentili; Maria Grazia De Marinis; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 4.964

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.