Literature DB >> 33132764

Critical success factors for implementation of an incident learning system in radiation oncology department.

Lucas Augusto Radicchi1, José Carlos de Toledo2, Dário Henrique Alliprandini3.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to analyze critical success factors (CSFs) for implementation of an incident learning system (ILS) in a radiation oncology department (ROD) and evaluate the perception of the staff members along this process.
BACKGROUND: Implementing an ILS is a way to leverage learning from incidents and is a tool for improving patient safety, consisting of a cycle of reporting and analyzing events as well as taking preventive actions. ILS implementation is challenging, requiring specific resources and cultural changes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ILS was designed and implemented based on the CSF identified in the literature review. Before starting the ILS implementation, a structured survey was applied to assess dimensions of patient safety culture. After the period of implementation (7 months), the survey was applied again and compared with the initial assessment, and interviews were performed with staff members to evaluate the overall satisfaction with ILS and CSFs.
RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were observed in 5 dimensions (12 totals) of the safety culture survey, considering time points before and after the ILS implementation. According to interviewees, "Facilitating committee", "Efficient data collection", "Focus on improvement", "Just culture" and "Feedback to users" were the most relevant CSFs.
CONCLUSIONS: The ILS designed and implemented at ROD was perceived as an important tool to support quality and safety initiatives, promoting the improvement in safety culture. The ILS implementation critical success factors were identified and have shown good agreement between the results of the literature and the users' practical perception.
© 2020 Greater Poland Cancer Centre. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incident learning system; Quality in radiation oncology; Radiation oncology department; Safety culture

Year:  2020        PMID: 33132764      PMCID: PMC7586060          DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.09.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother        ISSN: 1507-1367


  26 in total

1.  Chief executives define their own data needs.

Authors:  J F Rockart
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  1979 Mar-Apr

2.  Consensus recommendations for incident learning database structures in radiation oncology.

Authors:  E C Ford; L Fong de Los Santos; T Pawlicki; S Sutlief; P Dunscombe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  The Canadian National System for Incident Reporting in Radiation Treatment (NSIR-RT) Taxonomy.

Authors:  Michael Milosevic; Crystal Angers; Brian Liszewski; C Suzanne Drodge; Eve-Lyne Marchand; Jean Pierre Bissonnette; Erika Brown; Peter Dunscombe; Jordan Hunt; Haiyan Jiang; Krista Louie; Gunita Mitera; Kathryn Moran; Tony Panzarella; Matthew Parliament; Spencer Ross; Michael Brundage
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-01-30

4.  Patient safety improvements in radiation treatment through 5 years of incident learning.

Authors:  Brenda G Clark; Robert J Brown; Jodi Ploquin; Peter Dunscombe
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-07

5.  A real-time safety and quality reporting system: assessment of clinical data and staff participation.

Authors:  Douglas A Rahn; Gwe-Ya Kim; Arno J Mundt; Todd Pawlicki
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Collection and evaluation of incidents in a radiotherapy department : a reactive risk analysis.

Authors:  Maurizio Portaluri; Fulvio Italo Maria Fucilli; Emilio Antonio Luca Gianicolo; Francesco Tramacere; Maria Carmen Francavilla; Cristina De Tommaso; Roberta Castagna; Giorgio Pili
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  RO-ILS: Radiation Oncology Incident Learning System: A report from the first year of experience.

Authors:  David J Hoopes; Adam P Dicker; Nadine L Eads; Gary A Ezzell; Benedick A Fraass; Theresa M Kwiatkowski; Kathy Lash; Gregory A Patton; Tom Piotrowski; Cindy Tomlinson; Eric C Ford
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-06-25

8.  An evaluation of departmental radiation oncology incident reports: anticipating a national reporting system.

Authors:  Stephanie A Terezakis; Kendra M Harris; Eric Ford; Jeff Michalski; Theodore DeWeese; Lakshmi Santanam; Sasa Mutic; Hiram Gay
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Application of an incident taxonomy for radiation therapy: Analysis of five years of data from three integrated cancer centres.

Authors:  Stuart Greenham; Stephen Manley; Kirsty Turnbull; Matthew Hoffmann; Amara Fonseca; Justin Westhuyzen; Andrew Last; Noel J Aherne; Thomas P Shakespeare
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-05-10

10.  Implementation of incident learning in the safety and quality management of radiotherapy: the primary experience in a new established program with advanced technology.

Authors:  Ruijie Yang; Junjie Wang; Xile Zhang; Haitao Sun; Yang Gao; Lu Liu; Lei Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.