Douglas A Rahn1, Gwe-Ya Kim1, Arno J Mundt1, Todd Pawlicki2. 1. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. 2. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: tpawlicki@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report on the use of an incident learning system in a radiation oncology clinic, along with a review of staff participation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: On September 24, 2010, our department initiated an online real-time voluntary reporting system for safety issues, called the Radiation Oncology Quality Reporting System (ROQRS). We reviewed these reports from the program's inception through January 18, 2013 (2 years, 3 months, 25 days) to assess error reports (defined as both near-misses and incidents of inaccurate treatment). RESULTS: During the study interval, there were 60,168 fractions of external beam radiation therapy and 955 brachytherapy procedures. There were 298 entries in the ROQRS system, among which 108 errors were reported. There were 31 patients with near-misses reported and 27 patients with incidents of inaccurate treatment reported. These incidents of inaccurate treatment occurred in 68 total treatment fractions (0.11% of treatments delivered during the study interval). None of these incidents of inaccurate treatment resulted in deviation from the prescription by 5% or more. A solution to the errors was documented in ROQRS in 65% of the cases. Errors occurred as repeated errors in 22% of the cases. A disproportionate number of the incidents of inaccurate treatment were due to improper patient setup at the linear accelerator (P<.001). Physician participation in ROQRS was nonexistent initially, but improved after an education program. CONCLUSIONS: Incident learning systems are a useful and practical means of improving safety and quality in patient care.
PURPOSE: To report on the use of an incident learning system in a radiation oncology clinic, along with a review of staff participation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: On September 24, 2010, our department initiated an online real-time voluntary reporting system for safety issues, called the Radiation Oncology Quality Reporting System (ROQRS). We reviewed these reports from the program's inception through January 18, 2013 (2 years, 3 months, 25 days) to assess error reports (defined as both near-misses and incidents of inaccurate treatment). RESULTS: During the study interval, there were 60,168 fractions of external beam radiation therapy and 955 brachytherapy procedures. There were 298 entries in the ROQRS system, among which 108 errors were reported. There were 31 patients with near-misses reported and 27 patients with incidents of inaccurate treatment reported. These incidents of inaccurate treatment occurred in 68 total treatment fractions (0.11% of treatments delivered during the study interval). None of these incidents of inaccurate treatment resulted in deviation from the prescription by 5% or more. A solution to the errors was documented in ROQRS in 65% of the cases. Errors occurred as repeated errors in 22% of the cases. A disproportionate number of the incidents of inaccurate treatment were due to improper patient setup at the linear accelerator (P<.001). Physician participation in ROQRS was nonexistent initially, but improved after an education program. CONCLUSIONS: Incident learning systems are a useful and practical means of improving safety and quality in patient care.
Authors: Vinicius José da Silva Nina; Fabio B Jatene; Nick Sevdalis; Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejía; Carlos Manuel de Almeida Brandão; Rosangela Monteiro; Luiz Fernando Caneo; Paula Gobi Scudeller; Augusto Dimitry Mendes; Vinícius Giuliano Mendes; Bellkiss Wilma Romano Journal: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017 Nov-Dec
Authors: David H Thomas; Brian Miller; Rachel Rabinovitch; Sarah Milgrom; Brian Kavanagh; Quentin Diot; Moyed Miften; Leah K Schubert Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Leah Schubert; Josh Petit; Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy; Rick Peters; Jack Towery; Bryan Stump; David Westerly; Jane Ridings; Patrick Kneeland; Arthur Liu Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 2.102