Stuart Greenham1, Stephen Manley2, Kirsty Turnbull1, Matthew Hoffmann3, Amara Fonseca2, Justin Westhuyzen1, Andrew Last3, Noel J Aherne1,4, Thomas P Shakespeare1,4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern New South Wales Cancer Institute, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Mid-North Coast Cancer Institute, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, Australia. 4. Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: To develop and apply a clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy. BACKGROUND: Capturing clinical incident information that focuses on near-miss events is critical for achieving higher levels of safety and reliability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy was established; coding categories were prescription, consent, simulation, voluming, dosimetry, treatment, bolus, shielding, imaging, quality assurance and coordination of care. The taxonomy was applied to all clinical incidents occurring at three integrated cancer centres for the years 2011-2015. Incidents were managed locally, audited and feedback disseminated to all centres. RESULTS: Across the five years the total incident rate (per 100 courses) was 8.54; the radiotherapy-specific coded rate was 6.71. The rate of true adverse events (unintended treatment and potential patient harm) was 1.06. Adverse events, where no harm was identified, occurred at a rate of 2.76 per 100 courses. Despite workload increases, overall and actual rates both exhibited downward trends over the 5-year period. The taxonomy captured previously unidentified quality assurance failures; centre-specific issues that contributed to variations in incident trends were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a taxonomy developed for radiation therapy enhances incident investigation and facilitates strategic interventions. The practice appears to be effective in our institution and contributes to the safety culture. The ratio of near miss to actual incidents could serve as a possible measure of incident reporting culture and could be incorporated into large scale incident reporting systems.
AIM: To develop and apply a clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy. BACKGROUND: Capturing clinical incident information that focuses on near-miss events is critical for achieving higher levels of safety and reliability. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A clinical incident taxonomy for radiation therapy was established; coding categories were prescription, consent, simulation, voluming, dosimetry, treatment, bolus, shielding, imaging, quality assurance and coordination of care. The taxonomy was applied to all clinical incidents occurring at three integrated cancer centres for the years 2011-2015. Incidents were managed locally, audited and feedback disseminated to all centres. RESULTS: Across the five years the total incident rate (per 100 courses) was 8.54; the radiotherapy-specific coded rate was 6.71. The rate of true adverse events (unintended treatment and potential patient harm) was 1.06. Adverse events, where no harm was identified, occurred at a rate of 2.76 per 100 courses. Despite workload increases, overall and actual rates both exhibited downward trends over the 5-year period. The taxonomy captured previously unidentified quality assurance failures; centre-specific issues that contributed to variations in incident trends were also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a taxonomy developed for radiation therapy enhances incident investigation and facilitates strategic interventions. The practice appears to be effective in our institution and contributes to the safety culture. The ratio of near miss to actual incidents could serve as a possible measure of incident reporting culture and could be incorporated into large scale incident reporting systems.
Authors: Michael Milosevic; Crystal Angers; Brian Liszewski; C Suzanne Drodge; Eve-Lyne Marchand; Jean Pierre Bissonnette; Erika Brown; Peter Dunscombe; Jordan Hunt; Haiyan Jiang; Krista Louie; Gunita Mitera; Kathryn Moran; Tony Panzarella; Matthew Parliament; Spencer Ross; Michael Brundage Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2016-01-30
Authors: B A Fraass; K L Lash; G M Matrone; S K Volkman; D L McShan; M L Kessler; A S Lichter Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1998-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: David J Hoopes; Adam P Dicker; Nadine L Eads; Gary A Ezzell; Benedick A Fraass; Theresa M Kwiatkowski; Kathy Lash; Gregory A Patton; Tom Piotrowski; Cindy Tomlinson; Eric C Ford Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-06-25
Authors: Shea W Wilcox; Noel J Aherne; Linus C Benjamin; Bosco Wu; Thomaz de Campos Silva; Craig S McLachlan; Michael J McKay; Andrew J Last; Thomas P Shakespeare Journal: Onco Targets Ther Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 4.147