Literature DB >> 33132679

Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning.

Daniel J Bauer1,2, William C M Belzak1, Veronica Cole2.   

Abstract

Determining whether measures are equally valid for all individuals is a core component of psychometric analysis. Traditionally, the evaluation of measurement invariance (MI) involves comparing independent groups defined by a single categorical covariate (e.g., men and women) to determine if there are any items that display differential item functioning (DIF). More recently, Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis (MNLFA) has been advanced as an approach for evaluating MI/DIF simultaneously over multiple background variables, categorical and continuous. Unfortunately, conventional procedures for detecting DIF do not scale well to the more complex MNLFA. The current manuscript therefore proposes a regularization approach to MNLFA estimation that penalizes the likelihood for DIF parameters (i.e., rewarding sparse DIF). This procedure avoids the pitfalls of sequential inference tests, is automated for end users, and is shown to perform well in both a small-scale simulation and an empirical validation study.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33132679      PMCID: PMC7596881          DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling        ISSN: 1070-5511            Impact factor:   6.125


  26 in total

1.  Using Lasso for Predictor Selection and to Assuage Overfitting: A Method Long Overlooked in Behavioral Sciences.

Authors:  Daniel M McNeish
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Methodology for developing and evaluating the PROMIS smoking item banks.

Authors:  Mark Hansen; Li Cai; Brian D Stucky; Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Maria Orlando Edelen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model.

Authors:  R Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.

Authors:  Julia Kopf; Achim Zeileis; Carolin Strobl
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.821

5.  Sparse Versus Simple Structure Loadings.

Authors:  Nickolay T Trendafilov; Kohei Adachi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking.

Authors:  H R White; E W Labouvie
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1989-01

7.  A penalized likelihood method for multi-group structural equation modelling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.380

8.  A Moderated Nonlinear Factor Model for the Development of Commensurate Measures in Integrative Data Analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Curran; James S McGinley; Daniel J Bauer; Andrea M Hussong; Alison Burns; Laurie Chassin; Kenneth Sher; Robert Zucker
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  An alternative to post hoc model modification in confirmatory factor analysis: The Bayesian lasso.

Authors:  Junhao Pan; Edward Haksing Ip; Laurette Dubé
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2017-12

10.  A brief Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index with less potential for bias.

Authors:  Mitch Earleywine; Joseph W LaBrie; Eric R Pedersen
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 3.913

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.

Authors:  William C M Belzak; Daniel J Bauer
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2020-01-09

2.  Comprehensive measurement invariance of alcohol outcome expectancies among adolescents using regularized moderated nonlinear factor analysis.

Authors:  Angela K Stevens; Tim Janssen; William C M Belzak; Hayley Treloar Padovano; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  Demographic and functional differences among social security disability claimants.

Authors:  Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Lewis Kazis; Diane Brandt; Alan Jette
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Chun Wang; Marjorie Kleinman; Richard N Jones; David J Weiss
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Bias in measurement of autism symptoms by spoken language level and non-verbal mental age in minimally verbal children with neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Shuting Zheng; Aaron Kaat; Cristan Farmer; Audrey Thurm; Catherine A Burrows; Stephen Kanne; Stelios Georgiades; Amy Esler; Catherine Lord; Nicole Takahashi; Kerri P Nowell; Elizabeth Will; Jane Roberts; Somer L Bishop
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.