Literature DB >> 29795811

Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.

Julia Kopf1, Achim Zeileis2, Carolin Strobl3.   

Abstract

Differential item functioning (DIF) indicates the violation of the invariance assumption, for instance, in models based on item response theory (IRT). For item-wise DIF analysis using IRT, a common metric for the item parameters of the groups that are to be compared (e.g., for the reference and the focal group) is necessary. In the Rasch model, therefore, the same linear restriction is imposed in both groups. Items in the restriction are termed the ``anchor items''. Ideally, these items are DIF-free to avoid artificially augmented false alarm rates. However, the question how DIF-free anchor items are selected appropriately is still a major challenge. Furthermore, various authors point out the lack of new anchor selection strategies and the lack of a comprehensive study especially for dichotomous IRT models. This article reviews existing anchor selection strategies that do not require any knowledge prior to DIF analysis, offers a straightforward notation, and proposes three new anchor selection strategies. An extensive simulation study is conducted to compare the performance of the anchor selection strategies. The results show that an appropriate anchor selection is crucial for suitable item-wise DIF analysis. The newly suggested anchor selection strategies outperform the existing strategies and can reliably locate a suitable anchor when the sample sizes are large enough.

Keywords:  Rasch model; anchor class; anchor selection; differential item functioning (DIF); measurement invariance; uniform DIF

Year:  2014        PMID: 29795811      PMCID: PMC5965509          DOI: 10.1177/0013164414529792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0013-1644            Impact factor:   2.821


  3 in total

1.  Identification of Differential Item Functioning in Multiple-Group Settings: A Multivariate Outlier Detection Approach.

Authors:  David Magis; Paul De Boeck
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: toward a unified strategy.

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-11

3.  Loss of Information in Estimating Item Parameters in Incomplete Designs.

Authors:  Theo J H M Eggen; Norman D Verhelst
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.500

  3 in total
  14 in total

1.  Investigating Measurement Invariance by Means of Parameter Instability Tests for 2PL and 3PL Models.

Authors:  Rudolf Debelak; Carolin Strobl
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  Looking at DIF From a New Perspective: A Structure-Based Approach Acknowledging Inherent Indefinability.

Authors:  Anna Doebler
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-09-11

3.  Improving the Assessment of Differential Item Functioning in Large-Scale Programs With Dual-Scale Purification of Rasch Models: The PISA Example.

Authors:  Cheng-Te Chen; Bo-Sien Hwu
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-08-29

4.  Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning.

Authors:  Daniel J Bauer; William C M Belzak; Veronica Cole
Journal:  Struct Equ Modeling       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 6.125

5.  Differential Item Functioning Analysis Without A Priori Information on Anchor Items: QQ Plots and Graphical Test.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Hongyun Liu; Yuting Han
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  Practical Assessment of Alcohol Use Disorder in Routine Primary Care: Performance of an Alcohol Symptom Checklist.

Authors:  Kevin A Hallgren; Theresa E Matson; Malia Oliver; Katie Witkiewitz; Jennifer F Bobb; Amy K Lee; Ryan M Caldeiro; Daniel Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 6.473

7.  Power Analysis for the Wald, LR, Score, and Gradient Tests in a Marginal Maximum Likelihood Framework: Applications in IRT.

Authors:  Felix Zimmer; Clemens Draxler; Rudolf Debelak
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-08-27       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 8.  An R toolbox for score-based measurement invariance tests in IRT models.

Authors:  Lennart Schneider; Carolin Strobl; Achim Zeileis; Rudolf Debelak
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-12-16

9.  Methodological issues in measuring subjective well-being and quality-of-life: Applications to assessment of affect in older, chronically and cognitively impaired, ethnically diverse groups using the Feeling Tone Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Katja Ocepek-Welikson; John A Toner; Marjorie Kleinman; Mildred Ramirez; Joseph P Eimicke; Barry J Gurland; Albert Siu
Journal:  Appl Res Qual Life       Date:  2017-04-04

10.  Differential Item Functioning Analyses of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) Measures: Methods, Challenges, Advances, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Jeanne A Teresi; Chun Wang; Marjorie Kleinman; Richard N Jones; David J Weiss
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.