Siawoosh Mohammadi1, Martina F Callaghan2. 1. Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Neurophysics, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: s.mohammadi@uke.de. 2. Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The g-ratio, quantifying the comparative thickness of the myelin sheath encasing an axon, is a geometrical invariant that has high functional relevance because of its importance in determining neuronal conduction velocity. Advances in MRI data acquisition and signal modelling have put in vivo mapping of the g-ratio, across the entire white matter, within our reach. This capacity would greatly increase our knowledge of the nervous system: how it functions, and how it is impacted by disease. NEW METHOD: This is the second review on the topic of g-ratio mapping using MRI. RESULTS: This review summarizes the most recent developments in the field, while also providing methodological background pertinent to aggregate g-ratio weighted mapping, and discussing pitfalls associated with these approaches. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Using simulations based on recently published data, this review reveals caveats to the state-of-the-art calibration methods that have been used for in vivo g-ratio mapping. It highlights the need to estimate both the slope and offset of the relationship between these MRI-based markers and the true myelin volume fraction if we are really to achieve the goal of precise, high sensitivity g-ratio mapping in vivo. Other challenges discussed in this review further evidence the need for gold standard measurements of human brain tissue from ex vivo histology. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the quest to find the most appropriate MRI biomarkers to enable in vivo g-ratio mapping is ongoing, with the full potential of many novel techniques yet to be investigated.
BACKGROUND: The g-ratio, quantifying the comparative thickness of the myelin sheath encasing an axon, is a geometrical invariant that has high functional relevance because of its importance in determining neuronal conduction velocity. Advances in MRI data acquisition and signal modelling have put in vivo mapping of the g-ratio, across the entire white matter, within our reach. This capacity would greatly increase our knowledge of the nervous system: how it functions, and how it is impacted by disease. NEW METHOD: This is the second review on the topic of g-ratio mapping using MRI. RESULTS: This review summarizes the most recent developments in the field, while also providing methodological background pertinent to aggregate g-ratio weighted mapping, and discussing pitfalls associated with these approaches. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: Using simulations based on recently published data, this review reveals caveats to the state-of-the-art calibration methods that have been used for in vivo g-ratio mapping. It highlights the need to estimate both the slope and offset of the relationship between these MRI-based markers and the true myelin volume fraction if we are really to achieve the goal of precise, high sensitivity g-ratio mapping in vivo. Other challenges discussed in this review further evidence the need for gold standard measurements of human brain tissue from ex vivo histology. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the quest to find the most appropriate MRI biomarkers to enable in vivo g-ratio mapping is ongoing, with the full potential of many novel techniques yet to be investigated.
Authors: Tim B Dyrby; William F C Baaré; Daniel C Alexander; Jacob Jelsing; Ellen Garde; Lise V Søgaard Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Sara Lorio; Tim M Tierney; Amy McDowell; Owen J Arthurs; Antoine Lutti; Nikolaus Weiskopf; David W Carmichael Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Noam Shemesh; Sune N Jespersen; Daniel C Alexander; Yoram Cohen; Ivana Drobnjak; Tim B Dyrby; Jurgen Finsterbusch; Martin A Koch; Tristan Kuder; Fredrik Laun; Marco Lawrenz; Henrik Lundell; Partha P Mitra; Markus Nilsson; Evren Özarslan; Daniel Topgaard; Carl-Fredrik Westin Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-09-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Luis E Cortina; Richard W Kim; Matthew Kiely; Curtis Triebswetter; Zhaoyuan Gong; Maryam H Alsameen; Mustapha Bouhrara Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2021-10-19 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Rui D Alvites; Mariana V Branquinho; Ana C Sousa; Bruna Lopes; Patrícia Sousa; Justina Prada; Isabel Pires; Giulia Ronchi; Stefania Raimondo; Ana L Luís; Stefano Geuna; Artur Severo P Varejão; Ana Colette Maurício Journal: Biomolecules Date: 2022-06-11
Authors: Ian J Tagge; Ilana R Leppert; Dumitru Fetco; Jennifer Sw Campbell; David A Rudko; Robert A Brown; Nikola Stikov; G Bruce Pike; Paul S Giacomini; Douglas L Arnold; Sridar Narayanan Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 5.855
Authors: Tim M Emmenegger; Gergely David; Mohammad Ashtarayeh; Francisco J Fritz; Isabel Ellerbrock; Gunther Helms; Evelyne Balteau; Patrick Freund; Siawoosh Mohammadi Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Elizabeth N York; Sarah-Jane Martin; Rozanna Meijboom; Michael J Thrippleton; Mark E Bastin; Edwin Carter; James Overell; Peter Connick; Siddharthan Chandran; Adam D Waldman; David P J Hunt Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-11-03