Literature DB >> 30465865

Flexible proton density (PD) mapping using multi-contrast variable flip angle (VFA) data.

Sara Lorio1, Tim M Tierney2, Amy McDowell3, Owen J Arthurs4, Antoine Lutti5, Nikolaus Weiskopf6, David W Carmichael7.   

Abstract

Quantitative proton density (PD) maps measure the amount of free water, which is important for non-invasive tissue characterization in pathology and across lifespan. PD mapping requires the estimation and subsequent removal of factors influencing the signal intensity other than PD. These factors include the T1, T2* relaxation effects, transmit field inhomogeneities, receiver coil sensitivity profile (RP) and the spatially invariant factor that is required to scale the data. While the transmit field can be reliably measured, the RP estimation is usually based on image post-processing techniques due to limitations of its measurement at magnetic fields higher than 1.5 T. The post-processing methods are based on unified bias-field/tissue segmentation, fitting the sensitivity profile from images obtained with different coils, or on the linear relationship between T1 and PD. The scaling factor is derived from the signal within a specific tissue compartment or reference object. However, these approaches for calculating the RP and scaling factor have limitations particularly in severe pathology or over a wide age range, restricting their application. We propose a new approach for PD mapping based on a multi-contrast variable flip angle acquisition protocol and a data-driven estimation method for the RP correction and map scaling. By combining all the multi-contrast data acquired at different echo times, we are able to fully correct the MRI signal for T2* relaxation effects and to decrease the variance and the entropy of PD values within tissue class of the final map. The RP is determined from the corrected data applying a non-parametric bias estimation, and the scaling factor is based on the median intensity of an external calibration object. Finally, we compare the signal intensity and homogeneity of the multi-contrast PD map with the well-established effective PD (PD*) mapping, for which the RP is based on concurrent bias field estimation and tissue classification, and the scaling factor is estimated from the mean white matter signal. The multi-contrast PD values homogeneity and accuracy within the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and deep brain structures are increased beyond that obtained using PD* maps. We demonstrate that the multi-contrast RP approach is insensitive to anatomical or a priori tissue information by applying it in a patient with extensive brain abnormalities and for whole body PD mapping in post-mortem foetal imaging.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomical malformation; Biophysical tissue properties; Post-mortem MRI; Proton density; Quantitative MRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30465865      PMCID: PMC7611405          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  67 in total

1.  The in vivo influence of white matter fiber orientation towards B(0) on T2* in the human brain.

Authors:  B Bender; U Klose
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M N J Paley; E H Whitby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 2-8       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Fast spin-echo MR imaging of the brain and spine: current concepts.

Authors:  K M Jones; R V Mulkern; R B Schwartz; K Oshio; P D Barnes; F A Jolesz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI.

Authors:  Gunther Helms; Henning Dathe; Kai Kallenberg; Peter Dechent
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Multi-contrast reconstruction with Bayesian compressed sensing.

Authors:  Berkin Bilgic; Vivek K Goyal; Elfar Adalsteinsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  MR imaging of human brain at 3.0 T: preliminary report on transverse relaxation rates and relation to estimated iron content.

Authors:  N Gelman; J M Gorell; P B Barker; R M Savage; E M Spickler; J P Windham; R A Knight
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Ischaemic brain oedema.

Authors:  Cenk Ayata; Allan H Ropper
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 8.  Evaluating g-ratio weighted changes in the corpus callosum as a function of age and sex.

Authors:  Shai Berman; Kathryn L West; Mark D Does; Jason D Yeatman; Aviv A Mezer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study.

Authors:  Sudhin Thayyil; Neil J Sebire; Lyn S Chitty; Angie Wade; Wk Chong; Oystein Olsen; Roxana S Gunny; Amaka C Offiah; Catherine M Owens; Dawn E Saunders; Rosemary J Scott; Rod Jones; Wendy Norman; Shea Addison; Alan Bainbridge; Ernest B Cady; Enrico De Vita; Nicola J Robertson; Andrew M Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Multi-compartment microscopic diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Enrico Kaden; Nathaniel D Kelm; Robert P Carson; Mark D Does; Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional motion-corrected T1 relaxometry with MPnRAGE.

Authors:  Steven Kecskemeti; Andrew L Alexander
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Primary Multiparametric Quantitative Brain MRI: State-of-the-Art Relaxometric and Proton Density Mapping Techniques.

Authors:  Hernán Jara; Osamu Sakai; Ezequiel Farrher; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; N Jon Shah; David C Alsop; Kathryn E Keenan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 29.146

3.  Quantitative MRI Characterization of the Extremely Preterm Brain at Adolescence: Atypical versus Neurotypical Developmental Pathways.

Authors:  Ryan McNaughton; Chris Pieper; Osamu Sakai; Julie V Rollins; Xin Zhang; David N Kennedy; Jean A Frazier; Laurie Douglass; Timothy Heeren; Rebecca C Fry; T Michael O'Shea; Karl K Kuban; Hernán Jara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 29.146

4.  Multiparametric mapping in post-mortem perinatal MRI: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Amy R McDowell; Susan C Shelmerdine; Sara Lorio; Wendy Norman; Rod Jones; David W Carmichael; Owen J Arthurs
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  A Single-Scan, Rapid Whole-Brain Protocol for Quantitative Water Content Mapping With Neurobiological Implications.

Authors:  Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Ricardo Loução; Zaheer Abbas; Vincent Gras; Markus Zimmermann; N J Shah
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Sensitive detection of extremely small iron oxide nanoparticles in living mice using MP2RAGE with advanced image co-registration.

Authors:  Joong H Kim; Stephen Dodd; Frank Q Ye; Andrew K Knutsen; Duong Nguyen; Haitao Wu; Shiran Su; Simone Mastrogiacomo; Thomas J Esparza; Rolf E Swenson; David L Brody
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  hMRI - A toolbox for quantitative MRI in neuroscience and clinical research.

Authors:  Karsten Tabelow; Evelyne Balteau; John Ashburner; Martina F Callaghan; Bogdan Draganski; Gunther Helms; Ferath Kherif; Tobias Leutritz; Antoine Lutti; Christophe Phillips; Enrico Reimer; Lars Ruthotto; Maryam Seif; Nikolaus Weiskopf; Gabriel Ziegler; Siawoosh Mohammadi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Towards in vivo g-ratio mapping using MRI: Unifying myelin and diffusion imaging.

Authors:  Siawoosh Mohammadi; Martina F Callaghan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.