Literature DB >> 33129852

Prenatal metal mixtures and fetal size in mid-pregnancy in the MADRES study.

Caitlin G Howe1, Birgit Claus Henn2, Shohreh F Farzan3, Rima Habre3, Sandrah P Eckel3, Brendan H Grubbs4, Thomas A Chavez3, Dema Faham3, Laila Al-Marayati5, Deborah Lerner6, Alyssa Quimby7, Sara Twogood7, Michael J Richards8, John D Meeker9, Theresa M Bastain3, Carrie V Breton3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fetal growth is predictive of health later in life. Both toxic and essential metals influence fetal growth, but most studies have focused on these elements individually and used birth weight as an indicator of fetal growth. The objective of the current study was to investigate the impact of a mixture of metals on fetal size in mid-pregnancy in a predominately lower income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles.
METHODS: For our primary analysis, we focused on six elements that have previously been associated individually with fetal size, including arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), molybdenum (Mo), and tin (Sn), measured in maternal urine samples collected in early pregnancy (median: 12.4 weeks gestation). In an exploratory analysis, we additionally included cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), antimony (Sb), and thallium (Tl). Using covariate-adjusted Bayesian Kernel Machine Regression (BKMR) as our main mixture modeling approach, we examined the impact of these metals on fetal biometry measures obtained between 18 and 22 weeks gestation, with a focus on estimated fetal weight (EFW).
RESULTS: BKMR identified Mo and Ba as the mixture components that contributed most to associations with EFW. Linear associations were observed for both metals. An increase in Mo from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 0.114 (95% credible interval (CI): 0.019, 0.247) SD higher EFW, equivalent to a 7.4 g difference. Similar associations were observed between Mo and the other fetal measures evaluated. In contrast, an increase in Ba from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a -0.076 (95% CI: 0.217, 0.066) SD lower EFW, equivalent to a 4.9 g difference. Similar inverse associations were observed for Ba in relation to abdominal circumference and biparietal diameter. BKMR also identified a possible interaction between Ba and Mo in relation to head circumference, suggesting that the positive associations between Mo and this outcome may be attenuated at high levels of Ba, which was consistent with findings from linear regression (Pinteraction = 0.03). In an exploratory analysis accounting for a larger mixture of metals, Mo and Ba consistently contributed most to associations with EFW. An inverse association was also identified between Sb and EFW.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that Mo may promote fetal growth, while Ba and Sb may reduce fetal growth, in this population.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Essential elements; Fetal biometry; Fetal growth; Mixtures; Pregnancy; Toxic metals

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33129852      PMCID: PMC8079562          DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  51 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cumulative Environmental Health Impacts in California: Evidence From a Statewide Environmental Justice Screening Tool (CalEnviroScreen 1.1).

Authors:  Lara Cushing; John Faust; Laura Meehan August; Rose Cendak; Walker Wieland; George Alexeeff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The late effects of fetal growth patterns.

Authors:  F H Bloomfield; M H Oliver; J E Harding
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 3.  Arsenic in the human food chain, biotransformation and toxicology--Review focusing on seafood arsenic.

Authors:  Marianne Molin; Stine Marie Ulven; Helle Margrete Meltzer; Jan Alexander
Journal:  J Trace Elem Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 3.849

4.  Seafood intake and urine concentrations of total arsenic, dimethylarsinate and arsenobetaine in the US population.

Authors:  Ana Navas-Acien; Kevin A Francesconi; Ellen K Silbergeld; Eliseo Guallar
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Prenatal mercury exposure and birth weight.

Authors:  Mohsen Vigeh; Emiko Nishioka; Katsumi Ohtani; Yuki Omori; Takehisa Matsukawa; Shigeki Koda; Kazuhito Yokoyama
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Dietary determinants of urinary molybdenum levels in Mexican women: a pilot study.

Authors:  Pamela L Barrios; Ruth Argelia Vázquez-Salas; Lizbeth López-Carrillo; José A Menezes-Filho; Luisa Torres-Sánchez
Journal:  Salud Publica Mex       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

Review 7.  Early origins of adult disease: low birth weight and vascular remodeling.

Authors:  Silvia Visentin; Francesca Grumolato; Giovanni Battista Nardelli; Barbara Di Camillo; Enrico Grisan; Erich Cosmi
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 5.162

8.  Placental concentrations of essential, toxic, and understudied metals and relationships with birth outcomes in Chattanooga, TN.

Authors:  Colleen K Mikelson; Jacopo Troisi; Amy LaLonde; Steven J K Symes; Sally W Thurston; Lauren M DiRe; C David Adair; Richard K Miller; Sean M Richards
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Fetal growth versus birthweight: the role of placenta versus other determinants.

Authors:  Marie Cecilie Paasche Roland; Camilla M Friis; Nanna Voldner; Kristin Godang; Jens Bollerslev; Guttorm Haugen; Tore Henriksen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Preliminary analysis of in utero low-level arsenic exposure and fetal growth using biometric measurements extracted from fetal ultrasound reports.

Authors:  Matthew A Davis; John Higgins; Zhigang Li; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Emily R Baker; Amar Das; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 5.984

View more
  4 in total

1.  Joint associations among prenatal metal mixtures and nutritional factors on birth weight z-score: Evidence from an urban U.S. population.

Authors:  Xueying Zhang; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Srimathi Kannan; Whitney Cowell; Wenying Deng; Brent A Coull; Robert O Wright; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Prenatal metal(loid) mixtures and birth weight for gestational age: A pooled analysis of three cohorts participating in the ECHO program.

Authors:  Caitlin G Howe; Sara S Nozadi; Erika Garcia; Thomas G O'Connor; Anne P Starling; Shohreh F Farzan; Brian P Jackson; Juliette C Madan; Akram N Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; Theresa M Bastain; John D Meeker; Carrie V Breton; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Performance of urine, blood, and integrated metal biomarkers in relation to birth outcomes in a mixture setting.

Authors:  Pahriya Ashrap; Deborah J Watkins; Bhramar Mukherjee; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 8.431

4.  Urinary metals and maternal circulating extracellular vesicle microRNA in the MADRES pregnancy cohort.

Authors:  Caitlin G Howe; Helen B Foley; Shohreh F Farzan; Thomas A Chavez; Mark Johnson; John D Meeker; Theresa M Bastain; Carmen J Marsit; Carrie V Breton
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 4.861

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.