Literature DB >> 26384752

Influence of experience and the surgical learning curve on long-term patient outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Bryan M Burt1, Andrew W ElBardissi2, Robert S Huckman3, Lawrence H Cohn2, Marisa W Cevasco2, James D Rawn2, Sary F Aranki2, John G Byrne4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that increased postgraduate surgical experience correlates with improved operative efficiency and long-term survival in standard cardiac surgery procedures.
METHODS: Utilizing a prospectively collected retrospective database, we identified patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n = 3726), aortic valve replacement (AVR) (n = 1626), mitral valve repair (n = 731), mitral valve replacement (MVR) (n = 324), and MVR + AVR (n = 184) from January 2002 through June 2012. After adjusting for patient risk and surgeon variability, we evaluated the influence of surgeon experience on cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times, and long-term survival.
RESULTS: Mean surgeon experience after fellowship graduation was 16.0 ± 11.7 years (range, 1.0-35.2 years). After adjusting for patient risk and surgeon-level fixed effects, learning curve analyses demonstrated improvements in cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp times with increased surgeon experience. There was marginal improvement in the predictability (R(2) value) of cardiopulmonary bypass and crossclamp time for CABG with the addition of surgeon experience; however, all other procedures had marked increases in the R(2) following addition of surgeon experience. Cox proportional hazard models revealed that increased surgeon experience was associated with improved long-term survival in AVR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; P < .0001), mitral valve repair (HR, 0.73; P < .0001), and MVR + AVR (HR, 0.95; P = .006) but not in CABG (HR, 0.80; P = .15), and a trend toward significance in MVR (HR, 0.87; P = .09).
CONCLUSIONS: In cardiac surgery, not including CABG, surgeon experience is an important determinant of operative efficiency and of long-term survival.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve; aortic valve replacement; cardiopulmonary bypass; coronary artery bypass grafting; learning curve; mitral valve; mitral valve replacement; surgeon experience

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26384752     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  11 in total

1.  Independent Predictors of Increased Operative Time and Hospital Length of Stay Are Consistent Across Different Surgical Approaches to Pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Dimitrios Xourafas; Timothy M Pawlik; Jordan M Cloyd
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Safe implementation of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: application of learning curves and cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Jef Van den Eynde; Hannah Vaesen Bentein; Tom Decaluwé; Herbert De Praetere; MaryAnn C Wertan; Francis P Sutter; Husam H Balkhy; Wouter Oosterlinck
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Mid-term results of mitral valve repair using flexible bands versus complete rings in patients with degenerative mitral valve disease: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Alexandr V Bogachev-Prokophiev; Alexandr V Afanasyev; Sergei I Zheleznev; Vladimir M Nazarov; Ravil M Sharifulin; Alexandr M Karaskov
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 1.637

4.  Total arterial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction - feasibility and outcomes.

Authors:  Philippe Grieshaber; Lukas Oster; Tobias Schneider; Victoria Johnson; Coskun Orhan; Peter Roth; Bernd Niemann; Andreas Böning
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  What Is the Next Generation of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Devices?

Authors:  Mi Chen; Lizhong Sun
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-02-24

6.  A single center experience with minimally invasive approaches in congenital cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Joseph R Nellis; Mani A Daneshmand; Jeffrey G Gaca; Nicholas D Andersen; John C Haney; Joseph W Turek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  The development of a flexible heart model for simulation-based training.

Authors:  Jelle Man; Jos Maessen; Peyman Sardari Nia
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  High-Risk Committee for Cardiac Surgery Decision-Making: Results From 110 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Lauren V Huckaby; Thomas G Gleason; Francis D Ferdinand; Ibrahim Sultan; Danny Chu; Pyongsoo Yoon; Forozan Navid; Siva Venkata; David West; Claudio Lima; Victor Morell; Shangzhen Chen; Floyd Thoma; Sasha Drew; Arman Kilic
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Paramedic Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Case Volume Is a Predictor of Return of Spontaneous Circulation.

Authors:  Jenna E Tuttle; Michael W Hubble
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-05-15

Review 10.  BISMICS consensus statement: implementing a safe minimally invasive mitral programme in the UK healthcare setting.

Authors:  Hunaid A Vohra; M Yousuf Salmasi; Lueh Chien; Max Baghai; Ranjit Deshpande; Enoch Akowuah; Ishtiaq Ahmed; Michael Tolan; Toufan Bahrami; Steven Hunter; Joseph Zacharias
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.