Literature DB >> 33124884

His bundle pacing shows similar ventricular electrical activation as sinus: selective and nonselective His pacing indistinguishable.

Annie M Hirahara1,2, Matthias Lange2, Ankur Shah1,2, Muhammad S Khan2, Ravi Ranjan2,3, Greg Stoddard4, Derek J Dosdall1,2,3.   

Abstract

His bundle pacing utilizes the His-Purkinje system to produce more physiological activation compared with traditional pacing therapies, but differences in electrical activation between pacing techniques are not yet quantified in terms of activation pattern. Furthermore, clinicians distinguish between selective and nonselective His pacing, but measurable differences in electrical activation remain to be seen. Hearts isolated from seven dogs were perfused using the Langendorff method. Electrograms were recorded using two 64-electrode basket catheters in the ventricles and a 128-electrode sock situated around the ventricles during sinus rhythm (right atrial pacing), right ventricular (RV) pacing, biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy (biV-CRT), selective His pacing (selective capture of the His bundle), and nonselective His pacing (capture of nearby myocardium and His bundle). Activation maps were generated from these electrograms. Total activation time (TAT) was measured from the activation maps, and QRS duration was measured from a one-lead pseudo-ECG. Results showed that TAT, QRS duration, and activation sequence were most similar between sinus, selective, and nonselective His pacing. Bland-Altman analyses showed highest levels of similarity between all combinations of sinus, selective, and nonselective His pacing. RV and biV-CRT activation patterns were distinct from sinus and had significantly longer TAT and QRS duration. Cumulative activation graphs were most similar between sinus, selective, and nonselective His pacing. In conclusion, selective pacing and nonselective His bundle pacing are more similar to sinus compared with RV and biV-CRT pacing. Furthermore, selective pacing and nonselective His bundle pacing are not significantly different electrically.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our high-density epicardial and endocardial electrical mapping study demonstrated that selective pacing and nonselective His bundle pacing are more electrically similar to sinus rhythm compared with right ventricular and biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing. Furthermore, small differences between selective and nonselective His bundle pacing, specifically a wider QRS in nonselective His pacing, do not translate into significant differences in the global activation pattern.

Entities:  

Keywords:  His bundle pacing; His-Purkinje system; pacemaker; physiological pacing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33124884      PMCID: PMC7847072          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00292.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   4.733


  24 in total

1.  Agreement between methods of measurement with multiple observations per individual.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 2.  Permanent His bundle pacing: shaping the future of physiological ventricular pacing.

Authors:  Parikshit S Sharma; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  His or para-His pacing preserves left ventricular function in atrioventricular block: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.

Authors:  Mads B Kronborg; Peter T Mortensen; Steen H Poulsen; Jens C Gerdes; Henrik K Jensen; Jens C Nielsen
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Permanent His bundle pacing: Recommendations from a Multicenter His Bundle Pacing Collaborative Working Group for standardization of definitions, implant measurements, and follow-up.

Authors:  Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Gopi Dandamudi; Francesco Zanon; Parikshit S Sharma; Roderick Tung; Weijian Huang; Jayanthi Koneru; Hiroshi Tada; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Daniel L Lustgarten
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Both selective and nonselective His bundle, but not myocardial, pacing preserve ventricular electrical synchrony assessed by ultra-high-frequency ECG.

Authors:  Karol Curila; Radka Prochazkova; Pavel Jurak; Marek Jastrzebski; Josef Halamek; Pawel Moskal; Petr Stros; Jana Vesela; Petr Waldauf; Ivo Viscor; Filip Plesinger; Ondrej Sussenbek; Dalibor Herman; Pavel Osmancik; Radovan Smisek; Pavel Leinveber; Danuta Czarnecka; Petr Widimsky
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Permanent His-bundle pacing maintains long-term ventricular synchrony and left ventricular performance, unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing.

Authors:  Domenico Catanzariti; Massimiliano Maines; Anna Manica; Carlo Angheben; Annamaria Varbaro; Giuseppe Vergara
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.214

8.  On-treatment comparison between corrective His bundle pacing and biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization: A secondary analysis of the His-SYNC Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Gaurav A Upadhyay; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman; Hemal M Nayak; Nishant Verma; Gopi Dandamudi; Parikshit S Sharma; Moeen Saleem; John Mandrola; Davide Genovese; Jess W Oren; Faiz A Subzposh; Zaid Aziz; Andrew Beaser; Dalise Shatz; Stephanie Besser; Roberto M Lang; Richard G Trohman; Bradley P Knight; Roderick Tung
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 6.343

9.  A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Jens C Nielsen; Lene Kristensen; Henning R Andersen; Peter T Mortensen; Ole L Pedersen; Anders K Pedersen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Statistical evaluation of reproducibility of automated ECG measurements: an example from arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy clinic.

Authors:  Timothy Huang; Cynthia A James; Crystal Tichnell; Brittney Murray; Joel Xue; Hugh Calkins; Larisa G Tereshchenko
Journal:  Biomed Signal Process Control       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 3.880

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.