Literature DB >> 27627709

Advances in Spinal Interbody Cages.

Sukrit Jain1, Adam E M Eltorai2, Roy Ruttiman2, Alan H Daniels3.   

Abstract

Since the late 1980s, spinal interbody cages (ICs) have been used to aid bone fusion in a variety of spinal disorders. Utilized to restore intervertebral height, enable bone graft containment for arthrodesis, and restore anterior column biomechanical stability, ICs have since evolved to become a highly successful means of achieving fusion, being associated with less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications and higher rates of fusion when than bone graft only spinal fusion. IC design and materials have changed considerably over the past two decades. The threaded titanium-alloy cylindrical screw cages, typically filled with autologous bone graft, of the mid-1990s achieved greater fusion rates than bone grafts and non-threaded cages. Threaded screw cages, however, were soon found to be less stable in extension and flexion; additionally, they had a high incidence of cage subsidence. As of the early 2000s, non-threaded box-shaped titanium or polyether ether ketone IC designs have become increasingly more common. This modern design continues to achieve greater cage stability in flexion, axial rotation and bending. However, cage stability and subsidence, bone fusion rates and surgical complications still require optimization. Thus, this review provides an update of recent research findings relevant to ICs over the past 3 years, highlighting trends in optimization of cage design, materials, alternatives to bone grafts, and coatings that may enhance fusion.
© 2016 Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cage subsidence; Interbody cage; Spine surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27627709      PMCID: PMC6584167          DOI: 10.1111/os.12264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1757-7853            Impact factor:   2.071


  20 in total

1.  Spinal instrumentation in the treatment of severe progressive spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  P R Harrington; J H Dickson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical assessment of anchored cervical interbody cages: comparison of 2-screw and 4-screw designs.

Authors:  Marco T Reis; Phillip M Reyes; Neil R Crawford
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Clinical outcomes and fusion success at 2 years of single-level instrumented posterolateral fusions with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/compression resistant matrix versus iliac crest bone graft.

Authors:  John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; Kenneth J Burkus; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  In Vivo Study of Hydroxyapatite-coated Hat Type Cervical Intervertebral Fusion Cage Combined With IGF-I and TGF-β1 in the Goat Model.

Authors:  Yutong Gu; Feng Zhang; William C Lineaweaver; Jian Zhang; Lianshun Jia; Jin Qi; Jun Wang; Xuebin Zhen
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xinwei Wang; Xuhua Lu; Lili Yang; Haisong Yang; Wen Yuan; Deyu Chen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Nitamar Abdala; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-10

7.  Comparative evaluation of bone-filled Polymethylmethacrylate implant, autograft fusion, and Polyetheretherketone cervical cage fusion for the treatment of single -level cervical disc disease.

Authors:  Tamer Orief; Ismael Ramadan; Zaki Seddik; Marwan Kamal; Mohamed Rahmany; Masakazu Takayasu
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-07

8.  Preliminary results in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with an experimental bioabsorbable cage - clinical and radiological findings in an ovine animal model.

Authors:  Dorothea Daentzer; Thilo Floerkemeier; Ivonne Bartsch; Waseem Masalha; Bastian Welke; Christof Hurschler; Theresa Kauth; Daniel Kaltbeitzel; Christian Hopmann; Bernd Kujat; Katharina Kalla
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-08-29

9.  The SNAP trial: a double blind multi-center randomized controlled trial of a silicon nitride versus a PEEK cage in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disorders: study protocol.

Authors:  Roel F M R Kersten; Steven M van Gaalen; Mark P Arts; Kit C B Roes; Arthur de Gast; Terry P Corbin; F Cumhur Öner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The CASCADE trial: effectiveness of ceramic versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion; protocol of a blinded randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark P Arts; Jasper F C Wolfs; Terry P Corbin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  8 in total

1.  Current Concepts of Contemporary Expandable Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Designs, Part 1: An Editorial on Their Biomechanical Characteristics.

Authors:  Boyle C Cheng; Isaac Swink; Rachelle Yusufbekov; Michele Birgelen; Lisa Ferrara; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Domagoj Coric
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Cell and Tissue Response to Polyethylene Terephthalate Mesh Containing Bone Allograft in Vitro and in Vivo.

Authors:  D Joshua Cohen; Lisa Ferrara; Marcus B Stone; Zvi Schwartz; Barbara D Boyan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-10-29

4.  A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Daniel R Romano; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

5.  Additive-manufactured Ti-6Al-4 V/Polyetheretherketone composite porous cage for Interbody fusion: bone growth and biocompatibility evaluation in a porcine model.

Authors:  Pei-I Tsai; Meng-Huang Wu; Yen-Yao Li; Tzu-Hung Lin; Jane S C Tsai; Hsin-I Huang; Hong-Jen Lai; Ming-Hsueh Lee; Chih-Yu Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Graham C Calvert; George VanBuren Huffmon; William M Rambo; Micah W Smith; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

7.  Osteogenic potential of human adipose derived stem cells (hASCs) seeded on titanium trabecular spinal cages.

Authors:  Laura Caliogna; Valentina Bina; Laura Botta; Francesco Maria Benazzo; Marta Medetti; Gianluca Maestretti; Mario Mosconi; Fabio Cofano; Fulvio Tartara; Giulia Gastaldi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Research progress on the biological modifications of implant materials in 3D printed intervertebral fusion cages.

Authors:  Jingbo Xue; Wenjun Wang; Shan Li; Yifan Huan; Bin Zhu; Haoxiang Chen; Ming Tang; Yiguo Yan; Cheng Wang; Zhihua Ouyang; Xuelin Li
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.896

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.