J Peter Campbell1, Sang Jin Kim2, James M Brown3, Susan Ostmo1, R V Paul Chan4, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer5, Michael F Chiang6. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Ophthalmology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. 3. School of Computer Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts; Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital Center for Clinical Data Science, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: michael.chiang@nih.gov.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of a quantitative deep learning-derived vascular severity score for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by assessing its correlation with clinical ROP diagnosis and by measuring clinician agreement in applying a novel scale. DESIGN: Analysis of existing database of posterior pole fundus images and corresponding ophthalmoscopic examinations using 2 methods of assigning a quantitative scale to vascular severity. PARTICIPANTS: Images were from clinical examinations of patients in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP Consortium. Four ophthalmologists and 1 study coordinator evaluated vascular severity on a scale from 1 to 9. METHODS: A quantitative vascular severity score (1-9) was applied to each image using a deep learning algorithm. A database of 499 images was developed for assessment of interobserver agreement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of deep learning-derived vascular severity scores with the clinical assessment of zone (I, II, or III), stage (0, 1, 2, or 3), and extent (<3 clock hours, 3-6 clock hours, and >6 clock hours) of stage 3 evaluated using multivariate linear regression and weighted κ values and Pearson correlation coefficients for interobserver agreement on a 1-to-9 vascular severity scale. RESULTS: For deep learning analysis, a total of 6344 clinical examinations were analyzed. A higher deep learning-derived vascular severity score was associated with more posterior disease, higher disease stage, and higher extent of stage 3 disease (P < 0.001 for all). For a given ROP stage, the vascular severity score was higher in zone I than zones II or III (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression found zone, stage, and extent all were associated independently with the severity score (P < 0.001 for all). For interobserver agreement, the mean ± standard deviation weighted κ value was 0.67 ± 0.06, and the Pearson correlation coefficient ± standard deviation was 0.88 ± 0.04 on the use of a 1-to-9 vascular severity scale. CONCLUSIONS: A vascular severity scale for ROP seems feasible for clinical adoption; corresponds with zone, stage, extent of stage 3, and plus disease; and facilitates the use of objective technology such as deep learning to improve the consistency of ROP diagnosis. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of a quantitative deep learning-derived vascular severity score for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by assessing its correlation with clinical ROP diagnosis and by measuring clinician agreement in applying a novel scale. DESIGN: Analysis of existing database of posterior pole fundus images and corresponding ophthalmoscopic examinations using 2 methods of assigning a quantitative scale to vascular severity. PARTICIPANTS: Images were from clinical examinations of patients in the Imaging and Informatics in ROP Consortium. Four ophthalmologists and 1 study coordinator evaluated vascular severity on a scale from 1 to 9. METHODS: A quantitative vascular severity score (1-9) was applied to each image using a deep learning algorithm. A database of 499 images was developed for assessment of interobserver agreement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distribution of deep learning-derived vascular severity scores with the clinical assessment of zone (I, II, or III), stage (0, 1, 2, or 3), and extent (<3 clock hours, 3-6 clock hours, and >6 clock hours) of stage 3 evaluated using multivariate linear regression and weighted κ values and Pearson correlation coefficients for interobserver agreement on a 1-to-9 vascular severity scale. RESULTS: For deep learning analysis, a total of 6344 clinical examinations were analyzed. A higher deep learning-derived vascular severity score was associated with more posterior disease, higher disease stage, and higher extent of stage 3 disease (P < 0.001 for all). For a given ROP stage, the vascular severity score was higher in zone I than zones II or III (P < 0.001). Multivariate regression found zone, stage, and extent all were associated independently with the severity score (P < 0.001 for all). For interobserver agreement, the mean ± standard deviation weighted κ value was 0.67 ± 0.06, and the Pearson correlation coefficient ± standard deviation was 0.88 ± 0.04 on the use of a 1-to-9 vascular severity scale. CONCLUSIONS: A vascular severity scale for ROP seems feasible for clinical adoption; corresponds with zone, stage, extent of stage 3, and plus disease; and facilitates the use of objective technology such as deep learning to improve the consistency of ROP diagnosis. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Michael C Ryan; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; Audina Berrocal; Kimberly Drenser; Jason Horowitz; Thomas C Lee; Charles Simmons; Maria-Ana Martinez-Castellanos; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Travis K Redd; John Peter Campbell; James M Brown; Sang Jin Kim; Susan Ostmo; Robison Vernon Paul Chan; Jennifer Dy; Deniz Erdogmus; Stratis Ioannidis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Michael F Chiang Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Deniz Erdogmus; Peng Tian; Dharanish Kedarisetti; Chace Moleta; James D Reynolds; Kelly Hutcheson; Michael J Shapiro; Michael X Repka; Philip Ferrone; Kimberly Drenser; Jason Horowitz; Kemal Sonmez; Ryan Swan; Susan Ostmo; Karyn E Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: James D Reynolds; Velma Dobson; Graham E Quinn; Alistair R Fielder; Earl A Palmer; Richard A Saunders; Robert J Hardy; Dale L Phelps; John D Baker; Michael T Trese; David Schaffer; Betty Tung Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2002-11
Authors: Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; J Peter Campbell; Deniz Erdogmus; Peng Tian; Dharanish Kedarisetti; Chace Moleta; James D Reynolds; Kelly Hutcheson; Michael J Shapiro; Michael X Repka; Philip Ferrone; Kimberly Drenser; Jason Horowitz; Kemal Sonmez; Ryan Swan; Susan Ostmo; Karyn E Jonas; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mrinali Patel Gupta; R V Paul Chan; Rachelle Anzures; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; Michael F Chiang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Kishan Gupta; J Peter Campbell; Stanford Taylor; James M Brown; Susan Ostmo; R V Paul Chan; Jennifer Dy; Deniz Erdogmus; Stratis Ioannidis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Sang J Kim; Michael F Chiang Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Adam Hanif; Charles Lu; Ken Chang; Praveer Singh; Aaron S Coyner; James M Brown; Susan Ostmo; Robison V Paul Chan; Daniel Rubin; Michael F Chiang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; John Peter Campbell Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2022-03-16
Authors: J Peter Campbell; Michael F Chiang; Jimmy S Chen; Darius M Moshfeghi; Eric Nudleman; Paisan Ruambivoonsuk; Hunter Cherwek; Carol Y Cheung; Praveer Singh; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Susan Ostmo; Malvina Eydelman; R V Paul Chan; Antonio Capone Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 14.277
Authors: Aaron S Coyner; Jimmy S Chen; Praveer Singh; Robert L Schelonka; Brian K Jordan; Cindy T McEvoy; Jamie E Anderson; R V Paul Chan; Kemal Sonmez; Deniz Erdogmus; Michael F Chiang; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; J Peter Campbell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Ali H Al-Timemy; Zahraa M Mosa; Zaid Alyasseri; Alexandru Lavric; Marcelo M Lui; Rossen M Hazarbassanov; Siamak Yousefi Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Kyung Jun Choi; Jung Eun Choi; Hyeon Cheol Roh; Jun Soo Eun; Jong Min Kim; Yong Kyun Shin; Min Chae Kang; Joon Kyo Chung; Chaeyeon Lee; Dongyoung Lee; Se Woong Kang; Baek Hwan Cho; Sang Jin Kim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-11-04 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Brittni A Scruggs; Shuibin Ni; Thanh-Tin P Nguyen; Susan Ostmo; Michael F Chiang; Yali Jia; David Huang; Yifan Jian; J Peter Campbell Journal: Ophthalmol Sci Date: 2022-01-11
Authors: Thanh-Tin P Nguyen; Shuibin Ni; Shanjida Khan; Xiang Wei; Susan Ostmo; Michael F Chiang; Yali Jia; David Huang; Yifan Jian; J Peter Campbell Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 3.418