Literature DB >> 12427059

Evidence-based screening criteria for retinopathy of prematurity: natural history data from the CRYO-ROP and LIGHT-ROP studies.

James D Reynolds1, Velma Dobson, Graham E Quinn, Alistair R Fielder, Earl A Palmer, Richard A Saunders, Robert J Hardy, Dale L Phelps, John D Baker, Michael T Trese, David Schaffer, Betty Tung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) demonstrated the efficacy of treatment for threshold ROP and indicated the need for worldwide ROP screening. Previous guidelines for ROP screening have been largely based on clinical impression; we can now develop evidence-based screening recommendations.
OBJECTIVE: To define the appropriate ages and retinal ophthalmoscopic signs that determine when to commence and conclude acute phase ROP screening.
DESIGN: Analysis of data from 2 prospective randomized controlled trials: CRYO-ROP (January 1, 1986, to November 30, 1987) and Light Reduction in ROP (LIGHT-ROP) (July 1, 1995, to March 31, 1997).
SETTING: Neonatal intensive care units in 23 study centers in the United States for CRYO-ROP and 3 centers for LIGHT-ROP. PATIENTS: Eyes were examined sequentially in 4099 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g (CRYO-ROP study) and in 361 infants with birth weight less than 1251 g and gestational age less than 31 weeks (LIGHT-ROP study).
RESULTS: In 99% of infants, retinal conditions indicating a risk of poor outcome were not observed before 31 weeks' postmenstrual age or 4 weeks' chronologic age. Signs indicating that the risk of visual loss from ROP was minimal or had passed were the infant's attainment of 45 weeks' postmenstrual age without the development of prethreshold ROP or worse, progression of retinal vascularization into zone III without previous zone II ROP, and full vascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial eye examination should be conducted by 31 weeks' postmenstrual age or 4 weeks' chronologic age, whichever is later. Acute phase ROP screening can be discontinued when any of the 3 signs is present, indicating that the risk of visual loss from ROP is minimal or passed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12427059     DOI: 10.1001/archopht.120.11.1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0003-9950


  76 in total

1.  Detection of clinically significant retinopathy of prematurity using wide-angle digital retinal photography: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Michele Melia; Angela N Buffenn; Scott R Lambert; Franco M Recchia; Jennifer L Simpson; Michael B Yang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: quantitative analysis of vascular change.

Authors:  Preeti J Thyparampil; Yangseon Park; M E Martinez-Perez; Thomas C Lee; David J Weissgold; Audina M Berrocal; R V Paul Chan; John T Flynn; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Diagnostic Trends in 2016 Versus 2007.

Authors:  Chace Moleta; J Peter Campbell; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; R V Paul Chan; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Toward a severity index for ROP: An unsupervised approach.

Authors:  Esra Ataer-Cansizoglu; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Susan Ostmo; Karyn Jonas; R V Paul Chan; J Peter Campbell; Michael F Chiang; Deniz Erdogmus
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

5.  Plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity: pilot study of computer-based and expert diagnosis.

Authors:  Rony Gelman; Lei Jiang; Yunling E Du; M Elena Martinez-Perez; John T Flynn; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 6.  [Guidelines for ophthalmological screening of premature infants].

Authors:  C Jandeck
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Importance of birth weight as a risk factor for severe retinopathy of prematurity when gestational age is 30 or more weeks.

Authors:  Leslie M Pierce; Edward L Raab; Ian R Holzman; Robin N Ginsburg; Scott E Brodie; Annemarie Stroustrup
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Long-term visual outcomes in extremely low-birth-weight children (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Rand Spencer
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

9.  Parental perceptions toward digital imaging and telemedicine for retinopathy of prematurity management.

Authors:  Joo-Yeon Lee; Yunling E Du; Osode Coki; John T Flynn; Justin Starren; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Effects of Myo-inositol on Type 1 Retinopathy of Prematurity Among Preterm Infants <28 Weeks' Gestational Age: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dale L Phelps; Kristi L Watterberg; Tracy L Nolen; Carol A Cole; C Michael Cotten; William Oh; Brenda B Poindexter; Kristin M Zaterka-Baxter; Abhik Das; Conra Backstrom Lacy; Ann Marie Scorsone; Michele C Walsh; Edward F Bell; Kathleen A Kennedy; Kurt Schibler; Gregory M Sokol; Matthew M Laughon; Satyanarayana Lakshminrusimha; William E Truog; Meena Garg; Waldemar A Carlo; Abbot R Laptook; Krisa P Van Meurs; David P Carlton; Amanda Graf; Sara B DeMauro; Luc P Brion; Seetha Shankaran; Faruk H Orge; Richard J Olson; Helen Mintz-Hittner; Michael B Yang; Kathryn M Haider; David K Wallace; Mina Chung; Denise Hug; Irena Tsui; Martin S Cogen; John P Donahue; Michael Gaynon; Amy K Hutchinson; Don L Bremer; Graham Quinn; Yu-Guang He; William R Lucas; Timothy W Winter; Stephen D Kicklighter; Kartik Kumar; Patricia R Chess; Tarah T Colaizy; Anna Marie Hibbs; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Heidi M Harmon; Elisabeth C McGowan; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.