| Literature DB >> 33121069 |
Neeranuch Suwannarin1,2, Tippawan Prapamontol1, Tomohiko Isobe2, Yukiko Nishihama2, Shoji F Nakayama2.
Abstract
Exposure to insecticides containing organophosphate (OP) and neonicotinoid (NEO) compounds has been associated with adverse reproductive health outcomes. This study characterized and identified predictors of exposure to OP and NEO among 100 reproductive-age farmworkers from two intensive farming areas in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand, including 50 each from the Fang (FA) and Chom Thong (CT) districts. OP exposure was determined by measuring the urinary concentrations of six dialkylphosphates (DAPs), whereas NEO exposure was determined by measuring the urinary concentrations of NEO compounds and their metabolites (NEO/m). The most frequently detected OPs were diethylphosphate (DEP) and diethylthiophosphate (DETP), with DETP having the highest geometric mean (GM) concentration, 8.9 μg/g-creatinine. The most frequently detected NEO/m were N-desmethyl-acetamiprid (N-dm-ACE), imidacloprid (IMI), and thiamethoxam (THX), with IMI having the highest GM concentration, 8.7 μg/g-creatinine. Consumption of well water was the predominant determinant of OP and NEO exposure in this population. In addition to encouraging workers to use personal protective equipment, exposure of farmworkers to these compounds may be reduced by nation-wide monitoring agricultural insecticides and other pesticides in community drinking water resources.Entities:
Keywords: dialkylphosphate; farmworker; human biomonitoring; insecticide; metabolite; neonicotinoid; occupational exposure; organophosphate; reproductive age; urine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33121069 PMCID: PMC7663695 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17217871
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Maps of Thailand (left) and Chiang Mai Province, showing the Fang (FA) and Chom Thong (CT) districts, located at 19°54′26″ N, 99°2′26″ E and 18°25′2″ N, 98° 40′27″ E, respectively.
Urinary DAP and NEO/m concentrations in reproductive-age farmworkers (N = 100).
| Compounds | Reproductive-Age Farmworkers ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (μg/g Cr) | %> MDL | GM | GSD | 95%CI | P50 | P75 | P95 | Max. |
| DAP: | ||||||||
| DMP | 15.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 17.3 | 91.2 |
| DMTP | 36.0 | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | 9.3 | 239.3 |
| DMDTP | 11.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 1.5 | 102.1 |
| DEP | 100.0 | 6.7 | 2.4 | 5.7–8.0 | 4.3 | 7.6 | 20.4 | 126.1 |
| DETP | 100.0 | 8.9 | 3.2 | 7.1–11.3 | 3.7 | 10.2 | 30.5 | 261.3 |
| DEDTP | 65.0 | 7.3 | 5.7 | 5.2–10.2 | 1.1 | 2.1 | 9.4 | 125.3 |
| NEO/m: | ||||||||
| ACE | 34.0 | - | - | - | - | 0.008 | 0.05 | 0.3 |
| CLO | 59.0 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.0–2.8 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| DIN | 9.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.06 | 0.3 |
| IMI | 94.0 | 8.7 | 4.2 | 6.6–11.6 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.7 | 75.3 |
| NIT | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| THX | 69.0 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.2–5.7 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 6.6 |
| THI | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| FLN | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.2 |
| N-dm-ACE | 99.0 | 7.3 | 2.6 | 6.0–8.8 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 5.6 |
| N-dm-THX | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| OH-IMI | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Of-IMI | 50.0 | 2.6 | 3.5 | 2.0–3.3 | 1.2 | 3.4 | 13.3 | 296.6 |
| SUF | 2.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1.0 |
| THIAM | 3.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.01 |
| TFNA-AM | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| TZNG | 5.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0.5 |
| Fipronil | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fipronil sulphide | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Fipronil sulphone | 8.0 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Ethiprole | 0.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Abbreviations: MDL, method detection limit; μg/g, micrograms per gram; Cr, creatinine; GM, geometric mean; GSD, geometric standard deviation; CI, confidence Interval; P50, 50th percentile; P75, 75th percentile; P95, 95th percentile; Max., maximum concentration; DAP, dialkylphosphate; DMP, dimethylphosphate; DMTP, dimetylthiophosphate; DMTDP, dimethyldithiophosphate; DEP, diethylphosphate; DETP, dietylthiophosphate; DETDP, diethyldithiophosphate; NEO/m, neonicotinoid and their metabolites; ACE, acetamiprid; CLO, clothianidin; DIN, dinotefuran; IMI, imidacloprid; NIT, nitenpyram; THI, thiacloprid; THX, thiamethoxam; SUF, sulfoxaflor; FLN, flonicamid; N-dm-ACE, N-desmethyl-ACE; THI-AM, thiacloprid-amide; Of-IMI, imidacloprid-olefin; TFNA-AM, trifluoromethyl-nicotinamide; OH-IMI, hydroxy-IMI; N-dm-THX, N-desmethyl-THX; -, values under MDLs. Note: MDLs were 2.5 μg/L for DMP; 1.0 μg/L for Of-IMI; 0.2 μg/L for DMTP, DMDTP, DEP, DEDTP, and TZNG; 0.1 μg/L for DETP, FLN, N-dm-THX, OH-IMI, TFNA-AM, and fipronil; 0.05 μg/L for CLO, DIN, IMI, NIT, and N-dm-ACE; 0.02 μg/L for THX, fipronil sulphide, fipronil sulfone, and ethiprole; 0.01 μg/L for THIAM; and 0.005 μg/L for ACE, THI, and SUF.
Predictors of urinary concentrations of DAP in reproductive-age farmworkers (N = 100).
| Variables | DEP | DETP | IMI | N-dm-ACE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.400 | 0.256 | 0.131 | 0.110 |
| (Intercept) | 0.47 (0.16, 0.78) | 0.27 (−0.19, 0.74) | −0.89 (−1.50, −0.28) | −0.33 (−0.75, 0.09) |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | Reference | Reference | ||
| Male | −0.09 (−0.21, 0.03) | −0.08 (−0.26, 0.10) | −0.07 (−0.31, 0.16) | −0.20 (−0.37, −0.04) |
| Age | 0.07 (0.0001, 0.14) | 0.08 (−0.03, 0.18) | 0.08 (−0.06, 0.22) | −0.04 (−0.13, 0.06) |
| BMI | −0.06 (−0.12, 0.01) | −0.06 (−0.16, 0.04) | 0.03 (−0.10, 0.17) | 0.03 (−0.06, 0.13) |
| Study site area | ||||
| Chom Thong District | Reference | Reference | ||
| Fang District | 0.32 (0.11, 0.53) | 0.31 (−0.001, 0.62) | 0.13 (−0.27, 0.54) | −0.13 (−0.41, 0.15) |
| Educational level | ||||
| No formal education | Reference | Reference | ||
| Primary school | −0.05 (−0.23, 0.13) | −0.03 (−0.29, 0.24) | 0.13 (−0.22, 0.48) | 0.03 (−0.21, 0.28) |
| High school | −0.13 (−0.36, 0.10) | −0.18 (−0.53, 0.16) | 0.12 (−0.33, 0.57) | −0.13 (−0.44, 0.18) |
| More than high school | 0.04 (−0.20, 0.29) | 0.001 (−0.36, 0.36) | 0.16 (−0.32, 0.63) | 0.35 (0.02, 0.68) |
| Family income | 0.03 (−0.04, 0.11) | 0.10 (−0.01, 0.21) | 0.06 (−0.09, 0.20) | 0.09 (−0.01, 0.19) |
| Occupation status | ||||
| Working their own farm | Reference | Reference | ||
| Working on rented farm | −0.09 (−0.31, 0.12) | 0.04 (−0.37, 0.28) | 0.05 (−0.37, 0.47) | −0.03 (−0.32, 0.26) |
| Working in others’ farm | 0.04 (−0.16, 0.24) | 0.02 (−0.28, 0.31) | 0.39 (0.0004, 0.77) | 0.17 (−0.10, 0.43) |
| Residential pesticide use | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 0.13 (−0.02, 0.29) | 0.20 (−0.04, 0.43) | 0.08 (0.23, 0.38) | 0.03 (−0.18, 0.24) |
| Home-grown vegetables consumption | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | 0.10 (−0.04, 0.25) | 0.22 (0.003, 0.44) | 0.12 (−0.16, 0.41) | −0.08 (−0.28, 0.12) |
| Home-grown fruits consumption | ||||
| No | Reference | Reference | ||
| Yes | −0.09 (−0.23, 0.04) | 0.14 (−0.35, 0.06) | −0.002 (−0.27, 0.27) | 0.14 (−0.05, 0.32) |
| Source of water consumption | ||||
| Tap water | Reference | Reference | ||
| Stream water | 0.07 (−0.17, 0.30) | 0.15 (−0.21, 0.50) | 0.004 (−0.46, 0.47) | 0.09 (−0.23, 0.41) |
| Bottled water | −0.04 (−0.33, 0.24) | 0.05 (−0.38, 0.47) | 0.08 (−0.48, 0.63) | −0.01 (−0.39, 0.37) |
| Well water | 0.44 (0.08, 0.80) | 0.57 (0.03, 1.12) | 0.98 (0.27, 1.69) | 0.02 (−0.47, 0.51) |
| Filtered water | 0.09 (−0.17, 0.34) | 0.03 (−0.35, 0.41) | 0.16 (−0.33, 0.66) | −0.16 (−0.50, 0.19) |
Abbreviations: β, standardised partial regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; R2, coefficient of determination; DEP, diethylphosphate; DETP, diethylthiophosphate; IMI, imidacloprid; N-dm-ACE, N-desmethyl-acetamiprid.