| Literature DB >> 33119832 |
Patricia M Lutz1, Philipp W Winkler1, Marco-Christopher Rupp1, Stephanie Geyer1, Andreas B Imhoff2, Matthias J Feucht1,3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze postoperative physical and sexual activity as well as Quality of Life (QoL) after complex patellofemoral reconstructions in female patients suffering from chronic patellofemoral instability (PFI).Entities:
Keywords: MPFL; Patellofemoral instability; Quality of Life; Return to sports; Sex; Sexual activity
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33119832 PMCID: PMC8384801 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06340-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.114
Descriptive statistics of the demographical data and main parameters of the total study group
| Variable | Total study group |
|---|---|
| Number of included patients | 34 |
| Follow-up [months] | 45.3 ± 15.7 (12–72) |
| Age [years] | 25.9 ± 5.2 (18–42) |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 24.2 ± 6.0 (17.4–43.3) |
| In a relationship | |
| Yes | 23 (68%) |
| No | 11 (32%) |
| Patella dislocation before surgery | |
| Less than 1 per year | 10 (29%) |
| Annually | 5 (15%) |
| Monthly | 8 (24%) |
| Weekly | 5 (15%) |
| Daily | 6 (18%) |
| Patella re-dislocation after surgery | |
| No re-dislocation | 32 (94%) |
| One re-dislocation | 1 (3%) |
| Two or more re-dislocations | 1 (3%) |
Continuous variables are shown as mean ± standard deviation (range), categorical variables are shown as number of patients and percentages of the total patient cohort
Descriptive statistics of the surgical interventions of the total study group
| Surgical interventions | Prevalence, |
|---|---|
| MPFL-R§ + DFO | 18 (53%) |
| MPFL-R* + Trochleoplasty | 7 (21%) |
| MPFL-R* + HTO | 1 (3%) |
| MPFL-R* + DFO + Trochleoplasty | 6 (18%) |
| MPFL-R + DFO + HTO + Trochleoplasty | 1 (3%) |
| MPFL-R + HTO + Trochleoplasty | 1 (3%) |
Categorical variables are shown as number of patients and percentages of the total patient cohort
DFO distal femoral osteotomy, MPFL-R reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament with autologous gracilis tendon, HTO high tibial osteotomy, TTO tibial tubercle osteotomy
*Concomitant TTO was performed in 1 patient (3%)
§Concomitant TTO was performed in 2 patients (6%)
Physical activity outcome scores of the total study group
| Total study group | |
|---|---|
| TEGNER current | 4* (range 2–6) |
| TEGNER preoperative | 3* (range 0–10) |
| Change in sports ability postoperatively§ | |
| No change, | 11 (33%) |
| Improved, | 16 (49%) |
| Deteriorated, | 6 (18%) |
| Reasons for sports reduction postoperatively$ | |
| Knee joint complaints, | 6 (55%) |
| Complaints in other parts of body, | 3 (27%) |
| Other reasons (family, career, other interests), | 4 (36%) |
TEGNER Tegner activity scale
*Values are median; categorical variables are shown as number of patients and percentages of the total patient cohort
§Question was answered by 33 patients
$Multiple answers possible; affects 11 patients who have indicated that the sport frequency has been reduced postoperatively
Descriptive statistics of the five dimensions of Quality of Life with Euro-QoL-Score (EQ-5D-3L)
| Dimension | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility | 28 (82%) | 6 (18%) | |
| Self-care | 34 (100%) | ||
| Usual activities | 31 (91%) | 3 (9%) | |
| Pain/discomfort | 14 (41%) | 19 (56%) | 1 (3%) |
| Anxiety/depression | 26 (77%) | 7 (21%) | 1 (3%) |
Level 1: indicating no problem, Level 2: indicating some problems, Level 3: indicating extreme problems; categorical variables are shown as number of patients and percentages of the total patient cohort
Descriptive statistics of sexual activity
| Variable | Total study group |
|---|---|
| Restriction of sexual activity due to knee joint complaints preoperativelya | |
| Yes, | 11 (34%) |
| Because of pain | 8 (25%) |
| Because of limited mobility | 6 (19%) |
| Because of apprehension | 7 (22%) |
| No, | 21 (66%) |
| Sexual activity postoperatively | |
| Yes, | 29 (91%) |
| No, | 3 (9%) |
| Because of knee joint complaints | 0 |
| Because of other reasons | 3 (9%) |
| Current restrictions of sexual activity due to knee joint complaintsb | |
| Yes, | 6 (19%) |
| Because of pain | 6 (19%) |
| Because of limited mobility | 4 (13%) |
| No, | 25 (81%) |
| Patellar dislocation during sexual activities preoperativelya | |
| Yes, | 2 (6%) |
| No, | 30 (94%) |
| Patellar dislocation during sexual activities postoperativelyc | |
| Yes, | 0 (0%) |
| No, | 29 (100%) |
| Change of quality of sexual activities postoperativelyd | |
| No change, | 3 (30%) |
| Improved, | 6 (60%) |
| Because of less pain | 4 (40%) |
| Because of improved mobility | 3 (30%) |
| Because of less apprehension | 5 (50%) |
| Deteriorated, | 1 (10%) |
| Change of quantity of sexual activities postoperativelyd | |
| No change, | 7 (70%) |
| More frequently, | 3 (30%) |
| Because of less pain | 3 (30%) |
| Because of improved mobility | 2 (20%) |
| Because of less apprehension | 2 (20%) |
| Less frequently, | 0 (0%) |
Categorical variables are shown as number of patients and percentages of patients
*Multiple answers possible
an = 32
bn = 31
cn = 29
dAffects 11 patients who reported restrictions of sexual activities due to knee problems preoperatively, of those only 10 patients answered this question