Literature DB >> 30835079

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patellofemoral Instability: a Critical Review.

Laurie Anne Hiemstra1,2, Jessica L Page3, Sarah Kerslake3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this paper was to review the current psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures that are commonly used for patients with patellofemoral instability. This review provides evidence to guide the selection of subjective outcome measures for assessing outcomes in clinical care and research studies. RECENT
FINDINGS: At the present time, there are two patient-reported outcome measures that have been designed for, and tested on, large cohorts of patellofemoral instability patients, the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability Score (NPI). The BPII is a wholistic quality of life outcome measure and the NPI is a symptom score. The use of disease-specific outcome measures such as the BPII and NPI, in combination with generic knee, functional activity, and/or psychological outcome measures that have been proven to be valid and reliable for the patellofemoral instability population, is most likely to provide a well-rounded evaluation of treatment outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Banff Patella Instability Instrument; Kujala score; Norwich Patellar Instability Score; Patellar dislocation; Patellofemoral instability; Patient-reported outcome measure

Year:  2019        PMID: 30835079      PMCID: PMC6542883          DOI: 10.1007/s12178-019-09537-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med        ISSN: 1935-9748


  6 in total

1.  Insall proximal realignment with/without tibial tubercle osteotomy for recurrent patellar instability yields acceptable medium- to long-term results but risk of osteoarthritis progression is considerable.

Authors:  Per Arne Skarstein Waaler; Truls Jellestad; Trine Hysing-Dahl; Elise Elvehøy; Eivind Inderhaug
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 2.  Patient-reported outcome measures for patellofemoral disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sergio Barroso Rosa; Andrea Grant; Peter McEwen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.928

3.  Portuguese Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Schmidt Alves Ferreira Galvão; Dayane Screpante Marques; Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli; Marcio de Castro Ferreira; Marcelo Seiji Kubota; Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-06-21

4.  Complex patellofemoral reconstruction leads to improved physical and sexual activity in female patients suffering from chronic patellofemoral instability.

Authors:  Patricia M Lutz; Philipp W Winkler; Marco-Christopher Rupp; Stephanie Geyer; Andreas B Imhoff; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 5.  Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.

Authors:  Theodorakys Marín Fermín; Filippo Migliorini; Giorgos Kalifis; Bashir Ahmed Zikria; Pieter D'Hooghe; Khalid Al-Khelaifi; Emmanouil T Papakostas; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Increasing patient-reported allergies are not associated with pain, functional outcomes, or satisfaction following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Andrew S Bi; Dhruv S Shankar; Kinjal D Vasavada; Nina D Fisher; Eric J Strauss; Michael J Alaia; Kirk A Campbell
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2022-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.