The effect of air-pollution and weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission and implications for further research: A systematic scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Air-pollution and weather exposure beyond certain thresholds have serious effects on public health. Yet, there is lack of information on wider aspects including the role of some effect modifiers and the interaction between air-pollution and weather. This article aims at a comprehensive review and narrative summary of literature on the association of air-pollution and weather with mortality and hospital admissions; and to highlight literature gaps that require further research.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping literature review. The search on two databases (PubMed and Web-of-Science) from 2012 to 2020 using three conceptual categories of "environmental factors", "health outcomes", and "Geographical region" revealed a total of 951 records. The narrative synthesis included all original studies with time-series, cohort, or case cross-over design; with ambient air-pollution and/or weather exposure; and mortality and/or hospital admission outcomes.
RESULTS: The final review included 112 articles from which 70 involved mortality, 30 hospital admission, and 12 studies included both outcomes. Air-pollution was shown to act consistently as risk factor for all-causes, cardiovascular, respiratory, cerebrovascular and cancer mortality and hospital admissions. Hot and cold temperature was a risk factor for wide range of cardiovascular, respiratory, and psychiatric illness; yet, in few studies, the increase in temperature reduced the risk of hospital admissions for pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, chest, and ischemic heart diseases. The role of effect modification in the included studies was investigated in terms of gender, age, and season but not in terms of ethnicity.
CONCLUSION: Air-pollution and weather exposure beyond certain thresholds affect human health negatively. Effect modification of important socio-demographics such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and weather is often missed in the literature. Our findings highlight the need of further research in the area of health behaviour and mortality in relation to air-pollution and weather, to guide effective environmental health precautionary measures planning.

Introduction

Air-pollution and weather exposure beyond region-specific thresholds have serious effects on the public health [1, 2]. Worldwide, population growth, increased urbanization, economic and industrial growth, intense energy consumption, high usage of transportation vehicles, improved living standards, and changing lifestyles and consumption patterns for at least the last 100 years have resulted in increased emissions of air pollutants including greenhouse gases; and fluctuations in ambient temperature and other weather variables [3, 4].

Ambient air-pollution consists of a range of pollutants including particulate matters with diameters of less than 10 μm (PM10) and less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5), nitrogen oxides (NOx) including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Sulphur dioxide (SO2), Carbon monoxide (CO), and Ozone (O3) that have been associated with a range of different acute and chronic health conditions [5, 6].

Weather exposure in terms of changing temperature, relative humidity, rainfall and other weather patterns can cause a wide range of acute illness and result in deaths especially among vulnerable populations who lack adequate physiological and behavioural responses to weather fluctuations [7, 8]. Age (elderly and children vs adults), sex, socioeconomic factors (poverty, education, and ethnicity among others), pre-existing chronic diseases, use of certain medications, and environmental conditions such as the absence of central heating increase individual’s susceptibility to environmental exposures [1, 9, 10]. Research has shown that hospital admissions and mortality increase when weather exposure exceed certain thresholds with lags up to 20 days [11-14].

Most of the literature has shown positive correlations of air-pollution and/or exposure to weather variables beyond region-specific thresholds with all-cause and cause-specific mortality and/or hospital admission especially related to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases [14-21]. Though, there is a lack of information on wider aspects including the role of some effect modifiers such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and weather factors. Literature has shown that ethnic minorities often live in more disadvantaged, highly populated urban communities with poor housing conditions and higher levels of air pollution exposure [22-24]. This results in poorer health and higher risk for chronic health problems with time. Similar to ethnicity, the interaction between air-pollution and weather variables in relation to health outcomes is often missed in the literature despite its importance in minimizing biased estimations. Air pollutants are highly reactive, and their formation is either catalysed or slowed down based on the existing weather conditions. For example, the presence of sunlight catalyses the formation of ozone pollutant resulting in higher ozone concentrations during the summer [25].

In this context, a thorough literature review is needed to map the available literature and highlight areas that require further research and investigation. Not to mention that further understanding of the effect of air-pollution and weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission is needed to achieve better environmental and health system planning, organization, resources allocation, and interventions. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review and narrative summary (not numerical estimate) of literature on the association of air-pollution and weather with mortality and hospital admissions; and to shed the light on areas that require further research. As far as we are aware, this is the first literature review examining the effect of multiple exposures (air-pollution and weather) on multiple outcomes (mortality and hospital admissions). We chose to focus our scoping literature review on countries that are part of the single European Union (EU) market (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, Norway, and Switzerland) and United Kingdom (UK) because these countries exhibit similar socio-economic, environmental, and health policies; minimizing the contextual differences in the effect of air-pollution and weather on mortality and hospital admission. Literature examining the effect of air-pollution and/or weather on mortality and hospital admissions in countries outside the EU and UK will be used for comparison purposes.

Materials and methods

Search strategy and database sources

To ensure methodological reliability, we carried out our scoping literature review according to the “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for scoping reviews” (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines (S1 Checklist) [26].

A literature search was performed on the 6th of February 2020 using “PubMed” and “Web of Science” database sources that cover health, medical, and environmental literature. We attempted to assess the effects of air-pollution and weather events on mortality and hospital admission in Europe by searching original research articles published in peer-reviewed journals in the last 8 years (between 06/02/2012 and 06/02/2020 inclusive). We chose to review research published in the last 8 years because in March 2007, the European Union (EU) Heads of State and Government endorsed an “integrated climate change and energy strategy” that will come into action post the expiry of Kyoto Protocol targets in 2012 and that aims to combat climate change and weather fluctuations and cut air-pollution emissions to 30% below the 1990 levels [27].

Our search strategy was divided into three conceptual categories: “environmental factors”, “health outcomes”, and “Geographical region”. The “Environmental factors” refers to air-pollution, including PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 air pollutants and to weather variables, including air temperature, rainfall, wind, relative humidity, and vapour pressure. The “health outcomes” include hospital admissions and mortality and the “Geographical region” refers to the EU countries and UK. For each conceptual category, a set of “MeSH” and “All Fields” terms joined by the Boolean operator “OR” were developed. Later, the three conceptual categories’ search terms were joined using the Boolean operator “AND”. Our search strategy excluded the “influenza infections”, as these are considered confounders rather than outcomes for air-pollution and weather exposure. For more details about the search codes used to navigate PubMed and Web of Science search engines, please refer to S1 Table.

To minimize finding irrelevant literature, our search was limited to the following categories in the “Web of Science” search engine: environmental sciences, public environmental occupational health, medicine general internal, environmental studies, multidisciplinary sciences, geosciences multidisciplinary, respiratory system, geography physical, geography, cardiac cardiovascular systems, urban studies, healthcare sciences services, peripheral vascular disease, medicine research experimental, emergency medicine, critical care medicine, health policy services, primary healthcare, social sciences biomedical, and demography. Grey literature, non-English language articles, conference abstracts, books, reports, masters and PhD dissertations, and unpublished studies were excluded from this review.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

To determine the studies that would be included in this scoping review, a set of inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed for the procedure of title, keyword, and abstract screening.

The inclusion criteria involved original quantitative research studies conducted in the EU and UK; that included at least one analysis where mortality and/or hospital admission was the outcome and where one or more of the following exposures were investigated: 1) ambient air pollutants including PM10, PM2.5, CO, NO2/NOx, SO2, and O3; 2) weather exposures including temperature, rainfall, wind, humidity, and pressure; and 3) extreme weather events including heat waves, cold spells, and droughts. Due to the large amount of literature on this topic and to allow comparable results between the studies, this review was limited to cohort, time-series, and case-crossover/self-controlled quantitative study designs where hazard ratios (HR), relative risks (RR), odd ratios (OR), or percentage increase were reported for quantifying the factors associated with mortality and hospital admission. These three study designs allow a temporal follow up to evaluate the effect of time varying exposures (air-pollution and weather) on the mortality and hospital admission health outcomes.

The exclusion criteria included the following:

Methodological studies

Original data studies that investigated the effect of ambient air-pollution and/or weather on mortality and/or hospital admission in countries outside the EU market and UK

Articles studying the effect of indoor air-pollution on mortality and hospital admission

Studies examining air-pollution and weather exposure on animals and plants

Studies on occupational air-pollution exposure

Non-English language articles

Mortality and/or hospital admission projections and forecasting studies

Protocol and letter to editor papers

Qualitative research studies

All types of literature reviews including but not limited to narrative, scoping, and systematic literature reviews

Screening and data abstraction

Our search strategy revealed 487 articles from the “PubMed” database and 517 articles from the “Web of Science” database. These articles were exported to the citation manager software “Endnote” where 53 duplicates were identified and removed resulting in a total of 951 articles (Fig 1). Using the titles, key words, and abstracts, the 951 articles were screened for relevance according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, explained in the previous section only by first author (MA). To ensure a rigorous and reliable application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the screening process, a second researcher (MM) screened independently a sample of 20% of the titles and abstracts of the 951 identified records. Disagreements between the two researchers were resolved through discussion until consensus was reached. All the studies that met the inclusion criteria (n = 149 articles) were retrieved for full text screening by MA. Following the full text screening phase, an additional 37 articles were excluded by MA resulting in a total of 112 articles to be included in the final narrative synthesis (Fig 1).

Fig 1

PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the literature search, screening process, results, and exclusions.

For narrative synthesis, the following information was retrieved from the 112 articles:

Study design

Location of the study population

The outcome of interest

Sample size

Exposure variables

The confounders adjusted for

The assessed exposure time and the lags considered

The exposure assessment method

The statistical/modelling approach

The relative risks (RR)/incident relative risks (IRR)/odd ratios (OR)/hazard ratios (HR) with their respective confidence intervals or the percentage increase that quantify the association between the outcome of interest (mortality and/or hospital admission) and the exposures (air-pollution and/or weather events).

Ethical approval

Not applicable for this scoping literature review as it only includes descriptive narrative analysis of 112 published articles.

Results

A total of 112 studies (S2 Table) were included in the final narrative review from which 70 involved the mortality outcome, 30 the hospital admission outcome, and 12 studies included both health outcomes (Table 1). Most of the studies used the time-series study design (n = 74, 66%) with Poisson models for data analysis, while minority of the reviewed studies employed the case-crossover design (n = 19, 17%) with conditional logistic regression for data analysis, and the cohort design (n = 18, 16%) with Cox hazard regression for data analysis (Table 1).

Table 1

Descriptive characteristics of the included articles (N = 112).

Characteristics	Number of studies	Percentage
Study design
Cohort	18	16%
Time series	74	66%
Case-crossover	19	17%
self-controlled case-series	1	1%
Study follow up time
<5 years	16	14%
5 to 10 years	48	43%
>10 years	48	43%
aExposures
PM10	50	45%
PM2.5	29	26%
O3	19	17%
NO2/NOx	40	36%
SO2	12	11%
CO	10	9%
Other air pollutants	7	6%
Temperature	56	50%
Humidity	4	4%
Rainfall	7	6%
Other weather variables	10	9%
Outcome in general
Mortality	70	63%
Hospital admission	30	27%
Both: mortality and hospital admission	12	11%
aSpecific Outcomes
All-causes	69	62%
Cardiovascular	51	46%
Respiratory	44	39%
Cerebrovascular	10	9%
Cancer	4	4%
Psychiatric disorders	6	5%
Pulmonary embolism	2	2%
Myocardial infarction	9	8%
Stroke	6	5%
Ischemic heart disease	11	10%
Arrhythmias	2	2%
Atrial fibrillation	1	1%
Heart failure	5	4%
Angina pectoris	2	2%
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)	6	5%
Asthma	1	1%
Diabetes	1	1%
Sudden infant death	1	1%
Other types of illness	13	12%

aPercentages do not add up to 100% as categories are not mutually exclusive.

Most of the studies examined all-cause, cardiovascular and respiratory disease mortality and hospital admission outcomes while some studies tried to focus more directly on certain types of specific diseases such as psychiatric disorders including mania and depression, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, and diabetes (Table 1).

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics of the included articles. S2 Table summarise the characteristics of the included studies in more details by the type of investigated health outcome. S3 Table demonstrate the included article’s reported associations in terms of coefficients with 95% confidence intervals between air-pollution and/or weather exposure and mortality and/or hospital admission outcomes.

The effect of air-pollution on mortality and hospital admission

In this review, six air pollutants (PM2.5, PM10, O3, CO, SO2, and NO2/NOx) were identified as causes of increased rates of mortality and hospital admissions. Each pollutant affects a range of diseases, most commonly, cardiovascular, respiratory, and cerebrovascular diseases. Some of the health effects can be immediate while others might appear after several days of initial exposure (Fig 2).

Fig 2

The time range for health outcomes following exposure by type of air pollutant.

The effect of particulate matter pollutants on mortality and hospital admission

Particulate matter is a heterogeneous mixtures of liquid droplets and solid particles suspended in the air that can result either from natural resources (windblown Saharan and non-Saharan dust, volcano ashes, forest fires, pollen, etc…) or from man-made activities including industrial processes, transportation vehicle smoke, burning of fossil fuels, extensive energy usage, combustion processes, and grinding and mining industries [28]. Due to its size, mass composition, and chemical components, particulate matter with larger diameter (PM10) will be deposited in nasal cavities and upper airways while particulate matter with smaller diameter (PM2.5) may penetrate more deeply the respiratory system reaching the alveoli and blood stream, carrying with them various toxic substances [29]. This in turn will cause health problems in humans such as asthma, irregular heartbeat, nonfatal heart attacks, decreased lung function, coughing and difficulty breathing symptoms [30].

Our review showed that PM10 air-pollution is positively associated with a range of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases mortality and hospital admission outcomes (Fig 3A and S3 Table). Fischer et al. (2015) showed an elevated hazard of 1.06 (95% CI = 1.04 to 1.08) for cardiovascular disease mortality for every 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 pollution in the Netherlands [31]. Likewise, PM10 pollution acted as a risk factor for respiratory diseases mortality (HR = 1.11, 95%CI = 1.08 to 1.15; RR = 1.056, 95%CI = 1.043 to 1.069) [21, 32] and hospital admission (%increase = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.20 to 1.19) [20].

Fig 3

The number of reviewed articles and the type of association between air pollutants and the most studied mortality and hospital admission outcomes.

Air-pollution with PM2.5 exhibited a similar effect on human health as that of PM10 (Fig 3B and S3 Table). Nevertheless, PM2.5 was shown to have a greater risk on human health as compared to PM10 due to its smaller diameter size allowing more deep penetration into the respiratory system [33]. In France, Sanyal et al. (2018) showed an increased risk of 1.11 and 1.02 for all-cause hospital admission and moratality respectively per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 pollutant [32].

The effect of ozone pollution on mortality and hospital admission

Contrary to particulate matter pollution, the effect of ozone on mortality and hospital admission did not show a consistent effect. In some studies, ozone acted as a protective factor agianst mortality and hospital admission, while in other studies it showed increased risk or no association with mortality and hospital admissions (Fig 3C and S3 Table). This is related to the fact that ozone is a highly reactive pollutant and its formation is related to the presence of sunlight [25]. In a cohort study conducted by Carey et al. (2013) in England, ozone acted as a protective factor agianst all-cause mortality (HR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.93 to 0.98), cardiovascular mortality (HR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.94 to 0.98), respiratory mortality (HR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.90 to 0.96), and lung cancer mortality (HR = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.90 to 0.98) [21]. However, ozone acted as a risk factor in some of the reviewed studies leading up to 2% increase in all-cause mortality per interquartile range increase of ozone concentration [34-37].

The effect of nitrogen oxides pollution on mortality and hospital admission

Similar to other air pollutants, this review showed that exposure to nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen oxides pollution can cause many types of diseases resulting in increased risk for all-cause mortality and hospital admission [25, 32, 38, 39] (Fig 3D and S3 Table). A study conducted in Belgium showed a 3.5% increase in cardiovascular hospital admission as well as 4.5% and 4.9% increase in ischemic stroke and haemorrhagic stroke hospital admissions respectively for each 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 [40].

The effect of sulphur dioxide pollution on mortality and hospital admission

Sulphur dioxide air-pollution is mainly caused from industrial processes and power plants that involve burning of fossil fuel. Exposure to SO2 pollution can cause mild health effects including eyes, nose, and throat irritations as well as severe health effects such as bronchial spasms and deaths due to respiratory insufficiency [41].

The effect of sulphur dioxide (SO2) on mortality and hospital admission was investigated in only 12 out of the 112 reviewed studies. Exposure to SO2 air-pollution was found to increase the risk for all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality [21, 39, 42] (Fig 3E and S3 Table).

The effect of carbon monoxide pollution on mortality and hospital admission

Carbon monoxide results from incomplete combustion of fossil fuels. Carbon monoxide is dangerous for human beings since it possess the ability to bind to haemoglobin resulting in reduction of the red blood cells to carry oxygen to cells [41].

Only 10 out of the 112 reviewed studies investigated the association of carbon monoxide (CO) with mortality and hospital admission. The majority of these studies showed that carbon monoxide exposure can cause a number of cardiovascular and respiratory health problems (Fig 3F and S3 Table). Exposure to carbon monoxide pollution resulted in increased odds for pulmonary embolism hospital admission [43]. Additionally, Renzi et al. (2017) showed that all-cause mortality increases by 0.12% for every 1 mg/m3 increase in CO [39]. On the contrary, carbon monoxide acted as a protective factor against chest disease hospital admission among patients with sickle cell anaemia in one of the reviewed studies [44]. This association was explained by the fact that carbon monoxide can bind to haemoglobin which enhances the affinity of other binding sites for oxygen in addition to reducing vasoconstriction and inflammation; suggesting a beneficial effect rather than risk factor for patients with sickle cell disease [44].

The effect of air temperature on mortality and hospital admission

Exposure to hot or cold temperature beyond region-specific thresholds exhibits a range of direct and indirect effects on human health. The direct effects include hyperthermia or heat stress during hot temperature exposures and hypothermia and ischemic stroke during cold temperature exposures [45]. Besides the direct effects, small fluctuations in temperature across time can result in indirect effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems of the body [45].

Most of the reviewed articles that studied the effect of weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission focused on air temperature exposure with lags ranging from 0 days up to 5 weeks for cold temperatures and from 0 days up to 25 days for hot temperatures. The reviewed studies examined the effect of cold temperature, hot temperature, and air temperature increase on a range of diseases, most commonly, cardiovascular, respiratory, and psychiatric disorders. Table 2 below shows the definitions of “cold temperature”, “hot temperature”, and “air temperature increase” classifications derived from the reviewed studies.

Table 2

The definitions of air temperature exposure classifications.

Classification	Definition
Cold temperature	Exposures to air temperature in the winter season below identified thresholds ranging from -7°C to 6°C
Hot temperature	Exposures to air temperature in the summer season above identified thresholds ranging from 20°C to 37°C
Air temperature increase	Exposures to increasing temperature across the whole year. Associations are interpreted per 1°C increase in temperature.

Cold temperature acted as a risk factor for several types of mortality and hospital admission outcomes (Fig 4A and S3 Table). Nevertheless, cold temperature was a protective factor only in one of the reviwed studies for all-cause mortality at lag 0 (RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.985 to 0.995); yet cold temperature acted as a risk factor for all-cause mortality in the same study at lag of 14 days with a relative risk of 1.003 emphasizing the delayed effect of cold temperature on mortality [46].

Fig 4

The number of reviewed articles and the type of association between temperature and the most studied mortality and hospital admission outcomes.

Similar to cold temperature, hot temperature also acted as a risk factor in most of the reviewed studies for a number of mortality and hospital admission outcomes (Fig 4B and S3 Table). On the other hand, hot temperatures were associated with reductions in hospital admission rates for ischemic heart disease (RR = 0.74, 95%CI = 0.55 to 0.99) in a study conducted by Bijelovic et al. (2017) and for all-cause hospital admissions (RR = 0.961, 95% CI = 0.956 to 0.967) and cardiovascular hospital admissions (RR = 0.975, 95% CI = 0.957 to 0.993) in a study conducted by Monteiro et al. (2013) [47, 48].

Some studies examined the effect of increasing temperature across the whole year on mortality and hospital admission. More than half of these studies showed a significant positive association between the increasing temperature and the mortality and hospital admission outcomes (Fig 4C and S3 Table).

The effect of other weather exposures on mortality and hospital admission

Similar to the temperature, weather exposures that include humidity, rainfall, sunshine, snowcover, air pressure, daylight, wind speed and wind direction with lags ranging from 0 up to 7 days were found to affect a range of diseases, most commonly, cardiovascular, respiratory, and psychiatric disorders (S3 Table).

Weather variables that showed significant positive assciations with hospital admission included: a rainfall effect on psychiatric hospital admission [49], sunshine and daylight effects on hospital trauma [50] and psychaitric admissions [51], wind speed effects on chest disease hospital admission [44], and air pressure effects on mania and depression hospital admission [49].

It is worth mentioning that sunshine showed inconsistency in its effect on psychaitric hospital admission, acting as a risk factor in a Danish study [52] while acting as a protective factor in a study conducted in Ireland [49].

The adjustments and effect modifications for the association of air-pollution and weather exposure with mortality and hospital admission

Most of the reviewed studies stratified and adjusted their analysis by age and gender [25, 40, 51, 53–61]. Socio-economic deprivation, education attainment, income level, marital status, and occupational class were considered as confounders or effect modifiers in some of the reviewed studies [25, 58, 62–66]. However, only one study considered ethnicity to act as an effect modifier in the association between all-cause mortality and “summer smog” days defined as having maximum temperature of 25°C and PM10 pollutant oncentration of 50 μg/m3 [62]. And only two studies investigating the effect of air-pollution on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in England adjusted for ethnicity in their multivariate regresison models [67, 68].

Some of the studies that examined the effect of air-pollution on mortality and hospital admission accounted for air temperature effect in their analysis [35, 40, 46]. Likewise, some of the reviewed articles that studied the association of weather exposure to mortality and hospital admission considered the effect of air-pollution in their analysis [34, 65, 69–72].

Other variables considered to affect the relationship of air-pollution and/or weather exposure with mortality and/or hospital admission included: weekend and holiday effect, population decrease during the summer, influenza epidemics, season, day of the week, and tobacco smoke [25, 40, 46, 54, 56, 73–79].

Discussion

In this scoping review of 112 articles, we aimed to examine the effect of (1) air pollution, (2) temperature, and (3) other weather exposures on mortality and hospital admission outcomes.

The first part of the review showed that air-pollution acted consistently as a risk factor for all-cause, cardiovascular, respiratory, cerebrovascular and cancer mortality and hospital admission in the EU and UK which is in line with the findings of studies conducted in other regions of the world [80-84]. For instance, elevated risks of cardiovascular and respiratory diseases mortality were reported in Istanbul-Turkey for every 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10, SO2 and NO2 pollutants [85]. An exception was ozone (O3) air-pollution which showed inconsistent association with mortality and hospital admission. Two explanations were offered in the literature for the negative association between health outcomes and ozone pollution. The first explanation is related to the fact that ozone is a highly seasonal pollutant since its formation is catalysed by sunlight rendering higher ozone concentrations in the summer as compared to winter season. Thus, ozone effect on health outcomes should be analysed by accounting for the season effect [21]. In the continental United States, a 49% higher risk in all-cause mortality was shown for every 10 ppb increase in ozone during the warm-season [86]. The second explanation is related to the high reactivity of ozone leading to the formation of other pollutants such as NO2 and particulate matter. Therefore, ozone is negatively correlated with other air pollutants and its effect on health outcomes should be analysed as a combined effect of O3 and NO2 (known as Ox effect) [25].

Additionally, our scoping review showed that the effect of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) pollution on mortality and hospital admission is more studied in the literature as compared to the other air pollutants. This could be related to the more pronounced effects of particulate matter exposure on health which is corroborated by many studies across the world [81, 87]. Despite the fact that PM10 particles are deposited in the nasal cavities and upper airways, PM2.5 may penetrate deep into the lung tissues (reaching the alveoli and bloodstream) and irritate the respiratory airways causing various respiratory and cardiovascular problems [29, 30, 88].

Similar to air pollution, the second part of this review showed that hot and cold temperature exposures beyond region-specific thresholds are risk factors for a wide range of respiratory, cardiovascular (including: ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, stroke, heart failure, and COPD), and psychiatric (including: mania and depression) illness in the EU and UK. These findings are corroborated by a wide body of literature from across the world [89-97]. In India, cold temperatures below 13.8°C were associated with increased risk of 6.3% for all-cause mortality, 27.2% for stroke mortality, 9.7% for ischemic heart disease mortality, and 6.5% for respiratory diseases mortality [92]. In Istanbul-Turkey, 23 days of exposure to hot temperature above 22.8°C was associated with a total of 419 excess deaths [90]. In Korea, hot temperature days of 25°C compared to 15°C were significantly associated with a 4.5% increase in cardiovascular hospitalizations [98].

It is worth to point out that the effect of cold temperature on health is more delayed (up to 5 weeks) in comparison to the more immediate effects of hot temperature (up to 25 days). Similar study in Northeast-Asia showed a delayed risk of cold temperature on mortality after 5 to 11 days, yet a more immediate effect of hot temperature on mortality after 1 to 3 days in each of Taiwan, Korea, and Japan countries [91].

Although exposure to hot or cold temperature can affect the health negatively, our scoping review showed that in few studies, the increase in temperature reduced the risk of hospital admissions for some types of cardiovascular diseases; mainly for pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, chest, and ischemic heart diseases. This could be explained by the fact that hot temperature can cause immediate increase in cardiovascular mortality rates; whereby many cases might pass directly to the death state without passing through the hospital admission state resulting in lower hospital admission rates [47].

The third part of this scoping review presented the studies that examined the effects of other weather exposures such as relative humidity, barometric pressure, rainfall, and wind speed on mortality and hospital admission outcomes. These weather exposures were found to affect significantly only hospital admission. No significant effect was noted with respect to the mortality outcome. The weather exposures acted as a risk factor for psychiatric disorders (including depression and Mania), chest disease, and trauma hospital admissions. This was corroborated by evidence from countries outside the EU as well [99-101]. Yet in some of the reviewed studies, weather exposures acted as a protective factor for some types of psychiatric and cardiovascular disorders. The significant negative association between ischemic heart disease hospital admission and humidity in one of the reviewed studies was explained by the fact that people in general and the elderly specifically reduce their activities during high humidity and temperature periods. This is mainly due to the lack of the body’s ability to perspire, which in turn reduces their risk of cardiovascular complications [48]. As for the protective effect of some weather exposures on psychiatric hospital admissions, similar findings were presented in Iran; with a negative association between barometric pressure and schizophrenia hospital admissions and rainy days and bipolar hospital admissions [101].

In addition to the association of air pollution and weather exposure with mortality and hospital admission outcomes, our review aimed to present the individual, socio-economic, and environmental factors that play an important role in modifying the latter association. The effect modifiers identified in this scoping review included: pre-existing health conditions, age, gender, educational attainment, wealth or income or socio-economic deprivation, occupation, marital status, tobacco smoking, season, day of the week, holidays, and influenza epidemics.

Individuals with pre-existing chronic health conditions face increased susceptibility toward air-pollution and weather exposure related mortality and hospital admission [52, 54, 78, 102].

Older people are more vulnerable to the health effects associated with air-pollution, hot or cold temperatures, and other weather variables [54, 56, 103–105]. This is due to the physiological degeneration of the human body with increasing age. Aging affects the normal function of the body organs resulting in many chronic cardiovascular, urinary, and respiratory health conditions. This reduces the ability of older people to adapt to increased concentrations of air pollutants and changing weather conditions [103, 105, 106]. Moreover, old age people have lower immunity and antioxidant defence as compared to young people placing them at a higher risk [107]. Many older people also have reduced mobility and mental abilities which delay their access to healthcare leading to severe health complications and death [108].

As for gender, our review revealed inconsistency regarding its modification effect on the association between air-pollution and weather exposure and mortality and hospital admission health outcomes. Nevertheless, most of the reviewed studies have found that females have higher risks of mortality and/or hospital admission after exposure to air-pollution and/or weather fluctuations beyond region-specific thresholds including hot and cold temperatures [9, 47, 57, 58, 65, 78, 109–112]. Whereas some studies found higher risks of mortality and/or hospital admissions among males in relation to air-pollution and/or weather exposure [25, 40, 42, 59, 70, 113, 114]. One explanation for this might be due to the physiological differences between males and females. Females have smaller lung size, yet higher airways reactivity making them more susceptible to air-pollution health effects as compared to males [42, 115]. Likewise, higher pulse rates and smaller heart size relative to the human body in females as compared to males render females more vulnerable to the health effects of air-pollution and hot or cold temperature exposures [115]. Moreover, females exhibit more fluctuations in hormone levels due to pregnancy, menstrual cycle and menopause periods which may place them at a higher health risk upon exposure to air-pollution and weather variations [115]. The different lifestyle, socio-economic position, and occupation type between males and females may also lead to different levels and duration of air-pollution and weather exposure [62, 109, 116–118]. However, it is worth mentioning that the effect modification of gender in the association of air-pollution and weather exposure with mortality and hospital admission outcomes is believed to be confounded by age since in many of the reviewed studies, higher risks were found among old aged females (age>65 years old) [47, 57, 61, 78, 112] and old aged males (age >70 years old) [114]. This confounding effect could be reduced either by assessing the combined effect modification of age and gender through an interaction term or by stratifying the analysis according to both the age groups and gender.

Wealth and socio-economic deprivation were also considered by some of the reviewed studies as an effect modifier in the relationship of air-pollution and weather with mortality and hospital admission. In general, the absence of wealth and presence of socio-economic deprivation increase the risk of exposure to air-pollution and weather variations resulting in elevated mortality and hospital admission rates in Europe [62, 66, 76] and in other parts of the world including New Zealand [22], United States of America [119], and Chile [120].

Educational attainment was also considered by some of the reviewed studies as an effect modifier, with higher risks detected among individuals with lower educational attainment [25, 63, 64, 121, 122]. Despite the consideration of age, gender, education, and wealth effect in the association of air-pollution and weather with mortality and hospital admissions in Europe, our scoping review revealed the lack of investigation into the role of other important socio-demographics such as ethnicity. Research has extensively shown that ethnic minorities live in more disadvantaged communities and have lower socio-economic status as well as poor housing conditions. This results in higher risk for chronic health problems associated with higher exposure on one hand and with lower access to quality healthcare on the other hand [22-24].

Finally, it is worth to note that most of the reviewed studies with a time-series or case-crossover design adjusted their analysis for the season effect [40, 46, 52, 54, 60, 71, 73, 74, 123, 124]. It is well established that air-pollution, temperature, and other weather variables vary with seasons [125-127]. Not to mention that the emission, formation, and dispersion of air pollutants is affected by seasonal weather variations which in turn affects the individual exposure levels [128]. Outdoor activities and daily habits (eg. Window ventilation of houses) might also vary depending on the season which reflect changes in the level and duration of individual exposure to air-pollution and weather changes [129].

Despite the value of this scoping literature review, it has some limitations. First, the employed search strategy was limited to original articles published in peer reviewed journals which might have led to the omission of unpublished work or articles that were published in non-indexed journals. Nevertheless, our search strategy involved navigation through two databases which enables a good catch of major published studies addressing the effect of air-pollution and weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission. Second, limiting our inclusion criteria only to English language articles might have resulted in missing some research written in other languages. However, as most of the literature worldwide is published in the English language, we believe that no major papers have been excluded. Third, this review was limited only to quantitative research which would have led to missing out other type of important research including opinion research pieces and letters to editor as well as qualitative research studies. Opinion research pieces and letters to editor provide a critical appraisal/discussion for the findings of original studies which warrant future research development. Qualitative studies provide an overview about the effect of air-pollution or weather variations on human health from the perspective of lay people rather than relying only on objective census/statistics numbers as in quantitative research. Forth, due to resources limitations, title and abstract screening as well as data abstraction were done only by one researcher (MA). Nevertheless, a second researcher performed title and abstract screening for a random sample of 20% of the retrieved records. Given the high consensus between the two researchers, we are confident of the exact application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our goal from this literature review was not to produce a numerical estimate but rather to give a narrative summary on the effect of air-pollution/weather on mortality/hospital admission. Hence, missing some studies would not be a major concern for this scoping review.

Literature gaps and implications for future research

This scoping review helped us to identify literature gaps that require further research.

First, this review revealed the extensive research carried out to determine the effect of air-pollution on human health. Yet, due to the high correlation between air pollutants and the issue of collinearity in multivariate models, most of the studies examined the effect of single pollutants on mortality and hospital admission outcomes. Nevertheless, the issue of correlation between air pollutants is highly contextual and it depends on the study settings including the season and the specific geographical area. Hence, future researchers should try to examine the effect of multi-pollutants on mortality and/or hospital admission in one model, where strong correlations between the air pollutants are absent.

Second, the majority of studies examined the direct effects of air-pollution and weather exposure on mortality and hospital admission without considering the role of certain effect modifiers. The examined effect modifiers considered mostly by the literature involve age, gender, education, socio-economic deprivation, and season. Therefore, there is a lack of evidence regarding the modifying effect of other individual factors such as previous disease conditions and ethnicity which affect the person’s health vulnerability. Indeed, future research is needed to find out the reasons behind elevated individual’s susceptibility to the detrimental effects of air-pollution and weather variations in certain groups of population.

Third, our review showed that most of the studies either investigated the effect of air-pollution or the effect of weather on mortality and hospital admission. The formation and dispersion of air pollutants depends highly on the existing atmospheric conditions such as temperature, humidity, and wind speed [130]. Therefore, future studies should consider examining the effect of both, weather conditions and air-pollution, on human health through interaction terms or adjustments in the analysis models.

Fourth, although extensive research has been performed to study the effect of particulate matter and nitrogen oxides pollution on human health, there was a lack of research with respect to other air pollutants including carbon monoxide, ozone, and sulphur dioxide. This might be due to the absence of rigorous and reliable measurements of these pollutants or due to the complexity of analysing the effect of these pollutants.

Fifth, literature is more focused on examining the effect of temperature on mortality and hospital admission, placing less emphasis on other weather exposures. Hence, future research should shift the focus toward other weather exposures such as wind speed, rainfall, humidity, snow cover, daylight, and air pressure.

Sixth, there was a lack of research examining the effect of air-pollution and weather on hospital admission. Mortality was the major outcome in most of the reviewed studies due to the ease of data access governed by less ethical considerations. Additionally, analysis is more straightforward given that it occurs only once in an individual’s life. Thus, it is recommended for future research to consider the impact of air-pollution and weather variables on hospital admission on its own and in combination with mortality through multistate modelling.

Finally, the majority of studies in this field employ the time-series design which uses aggregated mortality and hospital admission data linked to environmental exposures at the local authorities or municipalities level. Research that uses aggregated data neglect the physiological and socio-economic differences among individuals. Additionally, assigning air-pollution and weather exposure based on wide geographies overlook the small geographical exposure differences biasing the drawn estimates. Therefore, there is a need for cohort research studies that utilize individual level data linked to air-pollution and weather exposure at small geographical spatial resolution (eg. Postcodes).

Conclusion

In summary, our scoping review showed that air-pollution and weather exposure beyond certain thresholds lead to various impacts on human health, most commonly cardiovascular and respiratory problems, resulting in increased rates of mortality and hospital admission. Yet, further research is needed given that the effect modification of important socio-demographics such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and weather is often missed in the literature. Understanding this should give enough evidence to the policy makers to plan and act accordingly aiming to reduce the effects of air pollution and weather variations on the public health. Additionally, research should focus on projecting future health behaviour and mortality patterns in relation to air pollution and weather variations, in order to guide effective environmental and health precautionary measures planning.

PRISMA checklist followed for this systematic scoping review data searching, screening, and abstraction.

(DOC)

Click here for additional data file.

The search codes used in PubMed and Web of Science databases for this scoping literature review.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

A detailed summary of the characteristics of the 112 studies included in this scoping review by the type of investigated health outcome.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

A detailed summary of the reported associations between air pollution and/or weather exposures and mortality and/or hospital admission outcomes in the 112 reviewed studies in terms of coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

25 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-19327

The Effect of Air-pollution and Extreme-weather on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Abed Al Ahad,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 09 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Chon-Lin Lee, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled “The Effect of Air-pollution and Extreme-weather on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review” used the scoping review approach to summarize the literature on the association of air pollution and extreme weather with mortality and hospital admissions. The authors used the reviews to conclude that air pollution and extreme weather affect human health negatively. They also highlighted the literature gaps that require further research. This manuscript addresses an interesting environmental health issue and contains some useful information; however, I have several major concerns that need to be adequately addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

1. The author should clearly define “Extreme-weather.” It is commonly understood that extreme weather is when weather is significantly different from the usual weather pattern. However, most publications discuss the effect of ambient temperature, relative humidity, or other meteorological factors on health effects. The authors need to clarify the terminology. Also, modification of the title is also suggested.

2. Lines 42, the author mention “Climate Change” and briefly described it. Nevertheless, the effects of climate change are not discussed in the manuscript. The authors could consider to delete it in the background section.

3. Line 53-55, the author state that “there is a lack of information on the role of some effect modifiers such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and extreme-weather.” I suggest that the author provide some evidence about the importance of effect modifiers (ethnicity) and the interaction between air-pollution and extreme-weather (meteorological factors) in the context of their health effects.

4. Particulate matter (PM2.5 or PM10) is heterogeneous mixtures of solid and liquid particles emitted from a variety of sources. Recently, there are Along with size, concentration, and chemical components of particulate matter are important in mediating the effects of PM on human health. Although the evidence of PM composition with those adverse health effects is limited, I believe that, in this review, this issue is worth mentioning in the background.

5. The reasons for excluding the pediatric population is not justified. For assessing health impacts, to evaluate the whole population (from pediatrics to geriatrics) is very important. Especially, the authors attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the topic. I highly suggest the author included the pediatric population.

6. Line 132, one of the exclusion criteria is “studies investigating in-hospital death.” Is in-hospital death part of overall mortality? Why exclude those publications?

7. Line 212 and 377, the author state that “particulate matter especially the small-size ones (PM10 and PM2.5) penetrate deeply the respiratory system” is not entirely correct. Most PM10 particles are deposited in the nasal cavities and upper airways. However, PM2.5 particles may penetrate the lung alveoli and enter into the bloodstream. (Möller W, Felten K, Sommerer K, Scheuch G, Meyer G, Meyer P, et al. Deposition, retention, and translocation of ultrafine particles from the central airways and lung periphery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(4):426–32.)

8. Line 236-238 (This is related to the fact that ozone is a highly reactive pollutant and its formation is related to the presence of sunlight), the citation is needed for the statement.

9. In section 3.2. (The effect of air temperature on mortality and hospital admission), the cold, warm, and hot temperatures are needed to be clearly defined. Is the temperature cutoff identical among the references?

10. Line 528, the author discussed the correlation between air pollutants. In multipollutant models, because variables are commonly highly correlated, the collinearity becomes the major problem for multivariate analysis. I suggested the author describe the issue briefly.

11. In the conclusion section (line 571 and 573), the authors mention “climatic change.” However, this review does not touch upon the topic (climatic change). Overall, the sections “Discussion” is not well-organized and well-presented. It needs to be significantly revised.

Reviewer #2: This is a review paper that summarized 106 published works on air pollution and weather on mortality and hospital admission. The work followed PRISMA guideline to search and screen from literature.

Major points:

1. the goal of this manuscript is stated at line 510-512, not a numerical estimate but a narrative summary, these words should be addressed at the abstract or introduction as well.

2. a little bit confused at 4.2 literature gap part. The first suggestion stated that the exact role of individual pollutants is still unclear; but the third said that most studies examined the effect of single pollutants. The two statements contradict to each other. It might be better to merge the two gaps into one, and emphasize the interaction of the variables is the missing link.

Minor points:

1. Line 116, typo: heat.

2. Line505, missing a space between first two words.

3. Figures 3 and 4, please indicate what the y-axis is.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

15 Sep 2020

Professor Chon-Lin Lee

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Manuscript title: The Effect of Air-pollution and Extreme-weather on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review

PONE-D-20-19327

**Response to the Editor’s and Reviewers’ Comments

We thank the editor and the reviewers for their encouraging feedback and this opportunity to improve our manuscript. Please find below a point by point answer to the reviewers’ comments and the necessary changes made to the manuscript in track-changes. We also submitted a clean version of the manuscript in addition to the track-changes version.

Thank you for considering our work and we hope that the revised version is suitable for publication and we are looking forward to hearing from you again.

Sincerely,

Mary Abed Al Ahad, on behalf of the authors

Journal Requirements

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

**Authors’ response: We have abided by the journal requirements during the submission of this version of the manuscript in terms of following the Vancouver style for citation and the journal’s style for headings/subheadings and tables and figures.

2. Your ethics statement must appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please also ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics section of your online submission will not be published alongside your manuscript.

**Authors’ response: Ethics statement is not applicable for this manuscript as it is a scoping review of literature that is publicly available on “Pubmed” and “Web of Science” search engines.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

**Authors’ response: We included captions for the supporting information files at the end of the revised manuscript and updated the in-text citations to match accordingly.

Reviewers’ comments

Reviewer #1:

The manuscript entitled “The Effect of Air-pollution and Extreme-weather on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review” used the scoping review approach to summarize the literature on the association of air pollution and extreme weather with mortality and hospital admissions. The authors used the reviews to conclude that air pollution and extreme weather affect human health negatively. They also highlighted the literature gaps that require further research. This manuscript addresses an interesting environmental health issue and contains some useful information; however, I have several major concerns that need to be adequately addressed before the manuscript can be considered for publication.

1. The author should clearly define “Extreme-weather.” It is commonly understood that extreme weather is when weather is significantly different from the usual weather pattern. However, most publications discuss the effect of ambient temperature, relative humidity, or other meteorological factors on health effects. The authors need to clarify the terminology. Also, modification of the title is also suggested.

**Authors’ response: We have replaced the term “extreme weather” by “weather exposure” in the manuscript as our objective was to provide an overview on articles discussing the effect of ambient temperature, relative humidity and other weather exposures which could not merely be extreme weather exposures. We have also provided examples to explain what we mean by “weather exposure” in the introduction section on line 43 “Weather exposure in terms of changing temperature, relative humidity, rainfall and other weather patterns can cause a wide range of acute illness …..”.

We modified the title to be in line with the new terminology of “weather exposure”. The new title is: “The Effect of Air-pollution and weather exposure on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review”.

2. Lines 42, the author mention “Climate Change” and briefly described it. Nevertheless, the effects of climate change are not discussed in the manuscript. The authors could consider deleting it in the background section.

**Authors’ response: We have deleted the “climate change” phrase from the Introduction section.

3. Line 53-55, the author state that “there is a lack of information on the role of some effect modifiers such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and extreme-weather.” I suggest that the author provide some evidence about the importance of effect modifiers (ethnicity) and the interaction between air-pollution and extreme-weather (meteorological factors) in the context of their health effects.

**Authors’ response: Evidence about the importance of effect modifiers (ethnicity) and the interaction between air-pollution and weather exposure in the context of their health effects was added to the introduction section of the manuscript on page 4, line 55 to 65 as follows: “Though, there is a lack of information on wider aspects including the role of some effect modifiers such as ethnicity and the interaction between air-pollution and weather factors. Literature has shown that ethnic minorities often live in more disadvantaged, highly populated urban communities with poor housing conditions and higher levels of air pollution exposure (22-24). This results in poorer health and higher risk for chronic health problems with time. Similar to ethnicity, the interaction between air-pollution and weather variables in relation to health outcomes is often missed in the literature despite its importance in minimizing biased estimations. Air pollutants are highly reactive, and their formation is either catalyzed or slowed down based on the existing weather conditions. For example, the presence of sunlight catalyzes the formation of ozone pollutant resulting in higher ozone concentrations during the summer (25)”.

4. Particulate matter (PM2.5 or PM10) is heterogeneous mixtures of solid and liquid particles emitted from a variety of sources. Recently, there are Along with size, concentration, and chemical components of particulate matter are important in mediating the effects of PM on human health. Although the evidence of PM composition with those adverse health effects is limited, I believe that, in this review, this issue is worth mentioning in the background.

**Authors’ response: We included in the manuscript on page 11, line 216 to 226 a brief description about the effect of particulate matter on human health which is related to their size, composition, and concentration as follows: “Particulate matter is a heterogeneous mixtures of liquid droplets and solid particles suspended in the air that can result either from natural resources (windblown Saharan and non-Saharan dust, volcano ashes, forest fires, pollen, etc…) or from man-made activities including industrial processes, transportation vehicle smoke, burning of fossil fuels, extensive energy usage, combustion processes, and grinding and mining industries (28). Due to its size, mass composition, and chemical components, particulate matter with larger diameter ……”.

We mentioned this on page 11, line 216-226 in the section where we are talking about the effect of particulate matter on human health as it fits more the flow of the manuscript than including it in the introduction section.

5. The reasons for excluding the pediatric population is not justified. For assessing health impacts, to evaluate the whole population (from pediatrics to geriatrics) is very important. Especially, the authors attempt to provide a comprehensive review of the topic. I highly suggest the author included the pediatric population.

**Authors’ response: We have added the studies on pediatrics population (4 studies in total) to our scoping review which brings the total of reviewed studies from 106 to 110 studies. Below are the references for these 4 studies:

• Ghirardi, L., Bisoffi, G., Mirandola, R., Ricci, G., & Baccini, M. (2015). The Impact of Heat on an Emergency Department in Italy: Attributable Visits among Children, Adults, and the Elderly during the Warm Season. PLoS One, 10(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141054

• Janke, K. (2014). Air pollution, avoidance behaviour and children's respiratory health: Evidence from England. Journal of Health Economics, 38, 23-42. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.07.002

• Litchfield, I. J., Ayres, J. G., Jaakkola, J. J. K., & Mohammed, N. I. (2018). Is ambient air pollution associated with onset of sudden infant death syndrome: a case-crossover study in the UK. BMJ Open, 8(4). doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018341

• Piel, F. B., Tewari, S., Brousse, V., Analitis, A., Font, A., Menzel, S., . . . Rees, D. C. (2017). Associations between environmental factors and hospital admissions for sickle cell disease. Haematologica, 102(4), 666-675. doi:10.3324/haematol.2016.154245

6. Line 132, one of the exclusion criteria is “studies investigating in-hospital death.” Is in-hospital death part of overall mortality? Why exclude those publications?

**Authors’ response: We have added the studies addressing in-hospital death as part of overall mortality (2 studies in total) to our scoping review which brings the total of reviewed studies from 110 to 112 studies. Below are the references for these 2 studies:

• Callaly, E., Mikulich, O., & Silke, B. (2013). Increased winter mortality: the effect of season, temperature and deprivation in the acutely ill medical patient. Eur J Intern Med, 24(6), 546-551. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2013.02.004

• Lyons, J., Chotirmall, S. H., O'Riordan, D., & Silke, B. (2014). Air quality impacts mortality in acute medical admissions. Qjm, 107(5), 347-353. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hct253

7. Line 212 and 377, the author state that “particulate matter especially the small-size ones (PM10 and PM2.5) penetrate deeply the respiratory system” is not entirely correct. Most PM10 particles are deposited in the nasal cavities and upper airways. However, PM2.5 particles may penetrate the lung alveoli and enter into the bloodstream. (Möller W, Felten K, Sommerer K, Scheuch G, Meyer G, Meyer P, et al. Deposition, retention, and translocation of ultrafine particles from the central airways and lung periphery. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(4):426–32.)

**Authors’ response: We have modified the text on line 220-226 and line 386-393 in the new version of the manuscript to reflect the fact that PM10 particles are deposited in the nasal cavities and that PM2.5 can penetrate deep the lungs reaching the alveoli and blood stream and added the above reference for the statement.

8. Line 236-238 (This is related to the fact that ozone is a highly reactive pollutant and its formation is related to the presence of sunlight), the citation is needed for the statement.

**Authors’ response: Sorry for missing out the citation for that statement. We have now added citation “citation number 25” to this statement on line 246 of the new version of the manuscript.

9. In section 3.2. (The effect of air temperature on mortality and hospital admission), the cold, warm, and hot temperatures are needed to be clearly defined. Is the temperature cutoff identical among the references?

**Authors’ response: We have added a table “Table 2” which includes definitions for hot and cold temperature exposures with a range of cutoff (threshold) points. We took the classification of “hot” or “cold” temperature from the studies themselves and each study had its own identified cutoff point for hot and/or cold temperature.

Table 2. The definitions of air temperature exposure classifications

Classification Definition

Cold temperature Exposures to air temperature in the winter season below identified thresholds ranging from -7 ºC to 6 ºC

Hot temperature Exposures to air temperature in the summer season above identified thresholds ranging from 20 ºC to 37 ºC

Air temperature increase Exposures to increasing temperature across the whole year. Associations are interpreted per 1 ºC increase in temperature.

10. Line 528, the author discussed the correlation between air pollutants. In multipollutant models, because variables are commonly highly correlated, the collinearity becomes the major problem for multivariate analysis. I suggested the author describe the issue briefly.

**Authors’ response: We have now described the issue briefly and amended the paragraph on line 525 to 531 in the revised version of the manuscript as follows: “Yet, due to the high correlation between air pollutants and the issue of collinearity in multivariate models, most of the studies examined the effect of single pollutants on mortality and hospital admission outcomes. Nevertheless, the issue of correlation between air pollutants is highly contextual and it depends on the study settings including the season and the specific geographical area. Hence, future researchers should try to examine the effect of multi-pollutants on mortality and/or hospital admission in one model, where strong correlations between the air pollutants are absent”.

11. In the conclusion section (line 571 and 573), the authors mention “climatic change.” However, this review does not touch upon the topic (climatic change). Overall, the sections “Discussion” is not well-organized and well-presented. It needs to be significantly revised.

**Authors’ response: We have revised the conclusion section and replaced “climatic change” with “air pollution and weather variations” on line 577 in the revised manuscript.

Additionally, we have revised extensively the “Discussion” section to be more organized and well-presented which could be viewed in the track-changes version of the revised manuscript.

Reviewer #2:

This is a review paper that summarized 106 published works on air pollution and weather on mortality and hospital admission. The work followed PRISMA guideline to search and screen from literature.

Major points:

1. the goal of this manuscript is stated at line 510-512, not a numerical estimate but a narrative summary, these words should be addressed at the abstract or introduction as well.

**Authors’ response: We have added that the scoping review aimed for a narrative summary of the literature in both, the introduction (on line 71) and the abstract (on line 5).

2. a little bit confused at 4.2 literature gap part. The first suggestion stated that the exact role of individual pollutants is still unclear; but the third said that most studies examined the effect of single pollutants. The two statements contradict to each other. It might be better to merge the two gaps into one, and emphasize the interaction of the variables is the missing link.

**Authors’ response: Thank you for the comment. We have now merged the first and third literature gaps into one, focusing on the correlation and interaction between the air pollution variables on line 524-531 of the revised manuscript as follows: “First, this review revealed the extensive research carried out to determine the effect of air-pollution on human health. Yet, due to the high correlation between air pollutants and the issue of collinearity in multivariate models, most of the studies examined the effect of single pollutants on mortality and hospital admission outcomes. Nevertheless, the issue of correlation between air pollutants is highly contextual and it depends on the study settings including the season and the specific geographical area. Hence, future researchers should try to examine the effect of multi-pollutants on mortality and/or hospital admission in one model, where strong correlations between the air pollutants are absent”.

Minor points:

1. Line 116, typo: heat.

**Authors’ response: The typo mistake “heath” on line 116 was corrected to “heat”.

2. Line505, missing a space between first two words.

**Authors’ response: The space between first two words on line 505 was corrected.

3. Figures 3 and 4, please indicate what the y-axis is.

**Authors’ response: We have added the Y-axis and the X-axis descriptions to Figures 3 and 4

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Click here for additional data file.

15 Oct 2020

The Effect of Air-pollution and weather exposure on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review

PONE-D-20-19327R1

Dear Dr. Abed Al Ahad,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Chon-Lin Lee, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for having me to review the article entitled “The Effect of Air-pollution and weather exposure on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review.” This manuscript addresses an interesting environmental health issue. The authors put great effort into revising the manuscript. New, the article is well-written and contained important information to the knowledge domain about the health effects of air pollution. I think it is worthy of being published.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

19 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-19327R1

The Effect of Air-pollution and weather exposure on Mortality and Hospital Admission and implications for further research: A Systematic Scoping Review

Dear Dr. Abed Al Ahad:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Chon-Lin Lee

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE