| Literature DB >> 33116680 |
Asmaa M El-Kady1, Mostafa I El-Amir2, Mohammed H Hassan3, Khaled S Allemailem4, Ahmad Almatroudi4, Alzahraa Abdelraouf Ahmad5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Schistosomiasis is an important neglected tropical disease (NTD) in several developing countries. Praziquantel is the principle and efficacious chemotherapeutic agent that has been used to treat schistosomiasis for decades. Unfortunately, emerging resistance to praziquantel with accompanying reduced efficacy is reported in some localities. Hence, genetic diversity among parasite populations is of significant interest in assessing the effects of selective pressure generated by praziquantel therapy that might result in encouraging the emergence of new genotypes that are either non-susceptible or drug-resistant. The present study aimed to investigate the genetic diversity of Schistosoma haematobium among human populations using the RAPD technique to help clarify disease epidemiology and transmission.Entities:
Keywords: RAPD; Schistosomiasis haematobium; Upper Egypt; genetic diversity
Year: 2020 PMID: 33116680 PMCID: PMC7575065 DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S266928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Drug Resist ISSN: 1178-6973 Impact factor: 4.003
Figure 1Egypt’s map displaying the location of the Qena governorate, and the red box shows the site of four studied localities in Qena where the participants live (Alhujyrat, Altramsa, Dandara, and Qena).
No. of the Included Participants in the Study and Their Distribution
| Residence | No. of Included Participants | Percent [%] |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 12.7 | |
| 11 | 8.2 | |
| 53 | 39.5 | |
| 53 | 39.5 | |
| 134 | 100.0 |
Criteria of Patients Gave Positive RAPD –PCR Results
| Patient No. | Residence | Age | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Dandara | 17 | Haematuria |
| 9 | Qena | 5.5 | Haematuria |
| 11 | Qena | 8 | Haematuria |
| 13 | Al hujirat | 23 | Haematuria + dysuria |
| 15 | Qena | 50 | Haematuria |
| 17 | Qena | 40 | Haematuria + dysuria |
| 21 | Al hujirat | 27 | Haematuria |
| 22 | Qena | 46 | Haematuria |
| 29 | Dandara | 2 | Haematuria |
| 30 | Qena | 22 | Haematuria |
| 31 | Dandara | 27 | Haematuria |
| 34 | Dandara | 47 | Haematuria |
| 35 | Dandara | 30 | Haematuria |
| 36 | Al hujirat | 25 | Haematuria |
| 37 | Dandara | 28 | Haematuria |
| 38 | Al tramsa | 8 | Haematuria |
| 42 | Qena | 50 | Haematuria |
| 44 | Qena | 60 | Haematuria |
| 45 | Dandara | 2 | Haematuria |
| 47 | Dandara | 25 | Haematuria |
Figure 2RAPD-PCR patterns produced from the genomic DNA of Schistosoma haematobium isolated from 20 infected patients generated by four oligoprimers. (A) Positive control. (B) Negative control. (C) DNA Pattern generated with Primer A02. (D) DNA Pattern generated with Primer A07. (E) DNA Pattern generated with Primer A09. (F) DNA pattern with Primer A10. Bands were visualized by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide.
RAPD Polymorphism Among Human Schistosoma haematobium Isolates
| Primer | Total Number of Bands (a) | Amplified Fragment Size Range (bp) | Number of Polymorphic Bands (b) | Polymorphism |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 1190–223 | 9 | 100 | |
| 9 | 1395–234 | 9 | 100 | |
| 12 | 1747–198 | 12 | 100 | |
| 10 | 1860–241 | 10 | 100 | |
| 40 | 1860–198 | 40 | 100 |
Genetic Similarity Coefficient Among Human S. haematobium Isolates Showing Dissimilarities Between Isolates
| Similarity Matrix | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H7 | H9 | H11 | H13 | H15 | H17 | H21 | H22 | H29 | H30 | H31 | H34 | H35 | H36 | H37 | H38 | H42 | H44 | H45 | H47 | |
| H7 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||
| H9 | 0.757 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| H11 | 0.85 | 0.878 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
| H13 | 0.667 | 0.71 | 0.647 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
| H15 | 0.718 | 0.95 | 0.837 | 0.667 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
| H17 | 0.585 | 0.524 | 0.622 | 0.457 | 0.591 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| H21 | 0.684 | 0.769 | 0.81 | 0.688 | 0.78 | 0.651 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| H22 | 0.564 | 0.55 | 0.605 | 0.485 | 0.524 | 0.682 | 0.585 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| H29 | 0.706 | 0.8 | 0.737 | 0.714 | 0.811 | 0.564 | 0.778 | 0.595 | 1 | |||||||||||
| H30 | 0.593 | 0.5 | 0.516 | 0.762 | 0.467 | 0.375 | 0.552 | 0.4 | 0.56 | 1 | ||||||||||
| H31 | 0.667 | 0.647 | 0.649 | 0.815 | 0.611 | 0.579 | 0.8 | 0.556 | 0.581 | 0.667 | 1 | |||||||||
| H34 | 0.667 | 0.571 | 0.581 | 0.667 | 0.533 | 0.313 | 0.483 | 0.333 | 0.48 | 0.667 | 0.583 | 1 | ||||||||
| H35 | 0.424 | 0.353 | 0.378 | 0.296 | 0.333 | 0.474 | 0.4 | 0.611 | 0.258 | 0.25 | 0.467 | 0.333 | 1 | |||||||
| H36 | 0.615 | 0.519 | 0.533 | 0.8 | 0.483 | 0.387 | 0.571 | 0.414 | 0.583 | 0.824 | 0.696 | 0.824 | 0.261 | 1 | ||||||
| H37 | 0.813 | 0.727 | 0.722 | 0.692 | 0.686 | 0.486 | 0.647 | 0.4 | 0.533 | 0.609 | 0.69 | 0.696 | 0.345 | 0.636 | 1 | |||||
| H38 | 0.545 | 0.471 | 0.486 | 0.593 | 0.444 | 0.474 | 0.514 | 0.611 | 0.516 | 0.583 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.609 | 0.552 | 1 | ||||
| H42 | 0.462 | 0.519 | 0.467 | 0.4 | 0.483 | 0.323 | 0.429 | 0.414 | 0.333 | 0.353 | 0.435 | 0.471 | 0.348 | 0.375 | 0.545 | 0.435 | 1 | |||
| H44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| H45 | 0.286 | 0.273 | 0.24 | 0.4 | 0.25 | 0.231 | 0.261 | 0.167 | 0.316 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.545 | 0.353 | 0.333 | 0.364 | 0 | 1 | |
| H47 | 0.643 | 0.552 | 0.563 | 0.727 | 0.516 | 0.364 | 0.533 | 0.387 | 0.538 | 0.737 | 0.64 | 0.842 | 0.32 | 0.889 | 0.667 | 0.64 | 0.444 | 0 | 0.462 | 1 |
Figure 3Dendrogram (UPGMA) based on Nei and Li similarity coefficient.