| Literature DB >> 33114712 |
Chunxiao Sun1, Ziping Zhang1, Zilin Ren1, Liu Yu1, Huan Zhou1, Yaxin Han1, Mudassir Shah1, Qian Che1, Guojian Zhang1,2, Dehai Li1,2,3, Tianjiao Zhu1.
Abstract
Three new aspochracin-type cyclic tripeptides, sclerotiotides M-O (1-3), together with three known analogues, sclerotiotide L (4), sclerotiotide F (5), and sclerotiotide B (6), were obtained from the ethyl acetate extract of the fungus Aspergillus insulicola HDN151418, which was isolated from an unidentified Antarctica sponge. Spectroscopic and chemical approaches were used to elucidate their structures. The absolute configuration of the side chain in compound 4 was elucidated for the first time. Compounds 1 and 2 showed broad antimicrobial activity against a panel of pathogenic strains, including Bacillus cereus, Proteus species, Mycobacterium phlei, Bacillus subtilis, Vibrio parahemolyticus, Edwardsiella tarda, MRCNS, and MRSA, with MIC values ranging from 1.56 to 25.0 µM.Entities:
Keywords: cyclic tripeptides, antibacterial, Antarctica sponge-derived fungus, Aspergillus insulicola
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33114712 PMCID: PMC7694092 DOI: 10.3390/md18110532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1–6.
1H NMR (δH, J in Hz) spectroscopic data for compounds 1–3 in DMSO-d6.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 4.50, q (7.1) | 4.52, q (7.1) | 4.65, q (6.4) |
| 3 | 1.37, d (7.1) | 1.39, d (7.1) | 1.20, d (6.4) |
| NAla-CH3 | 2.83, s | 2.85, s | 2.63, s |
| 5 | 4.97, d (10.4) | 4.99, d (10.3) | 4.94, d (10.6) |
| 6 | 2.21, m | 2.22, m | 2.28, m |
| 7 | 0.63, d (6.7) | 0.64, d (6.7) | 0.74, d (6.7) |
| 8 | 0.79, d (6.4) | 0.80, d (6.3) | 0.81, d (6.2) |
| NVal-CH3 | 2.83, s | 2.85, s | 2.91, s |
| 10 | 4.71, m | 4.73, m | 5.33, t (5.5) |
| NOrn ( | 8.39, d (7.6) | 8.46, d (7.5) | 3.08, s |
| 11 | 1.61. m | 1.71, m | 1.70, m |
| 1.96, m | 1.96, m | 1.95, m | |
| 12 | 1.46, m | 1.47, m | 1.48, m |
| 1.67, m | 1.63, m | 1.66, m | |
| 13 | 2.86, m | 2.89, m | 2.97, m |
| 3.01, m | 3.01, m | 3.12, m | |
| NOrn ( | 7.47, t (6.0) | 7.51, t (5.7) | 2.83, s |
| 2′ | 6.55, d (14.3) | 6.60, d (14.6) | 6.64, d (15.0) |
| 3′ | 7.12, ov. | 7.17, ov. | 7.11, dd (15.0, 11.2) |
| 4′ | 7.16, ov. | 7.26, ov. | 6.46, dd (15.5, 11.2) |
| 5′ | 6.22, d (14.4) | 6.36, d (14.8) | 6.01, dd (15.5, 7.1) |
| 6′ | 3.71, dd (7.1, 3.9) | ||
| 7′ | 3.69, s | 3.34, m | |
| 8′ | 1.02, d (6.4) | ||
| 9′ | 3.23, s | ||
| 10′ | 3.25, s | ||
| COOH | 12.5, brs |
Recorded at 500 MHz. Recorded at 400 MHz. ov. Overlapped signal.
13C NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1–3 in DMSO-d6.
| No. | 1 | 2 | 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 171.1 | 171.2 | 168.5 |
| 2 | 54.9 | 55.0 | 52.9 |
| 3 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 17.2 |
| NAla-CH3 | 30.1 | 30.1 | 28.7 |
| 4 | 169.5 | 169.6 | 168.2 |
| 5 | 58.0 | 58.1 | 57.6 |
| 6 | 26.8 | 26.9 | 26.3 |
| 7 | 18.1 | 18.2 | 18.1 |
| 8 | 20.2 | 20.3 | 19.9 |
| NVal-CH3 | 30.2 | 30.3 | 29.7 |
| 9 | 171.9 | 172.0 | 171.8 |
| 10 | 50.1 | 50.2 | 52.7 |
| NOrn ( | 31.7 | ||
| 11 | 28.4 | 28.4 | 23.0 |
| 12 | 23.1 | 23.2 | 24.5 |
| 13 | 39.5 | 39.5 | 47.3 |
| NOrn ( | 33.6 | ||
| 1′ | 163.8 | 163.8 | 166.6 |
| 2′ | 132.3 | 133.0 | 122.3 |
| 3′ | 141.8 | 142.5 | 141.7 |
| 4′ | 136.7 | 136.7 | 131.5 |
| 5′ | 128.2 | 126.8 | 138.8 |
| 6′ | 167.5 | 166.7 | 83.9 |
| 7′ | 52.1 | 78.9 | |
| 8′ | 15.6 | ||
| 9′ | 57.1 | ||
| 10′ | 56.8 |
Recorded at 125 MHz. Recorded at 150 MHz. Recorded at 100 MHz.
Figure 2Key 2D NMR correlations of 1–3.
Figure 3HPLC analysis of the FDAA derivatives of the compounds 1 and 2 and the standard amino acids.
Figure 4Newman projections for C-6′/C-7′ of 4. All possible relative conformations are shown: 6′R*,7′R* (4a–4c) and 6′S*, 7′R* (4d–4f). Observed ROESY correlations are presented as arrowed line.
Figure 5Δδ values of 4g and 4h.
Antimicrobial assays of compounds 1–5 (MIC μM).
| No. |
|
|
|
|
| MRCNS | MRSA |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.13 | 3.13 | 3.13 | 1.56 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 3.13 |
|
| 6.25 | 6.25 | 12.5 | 1.56 | 12.5 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 6.25 |
|
| >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 |
|
| 25.0 | 25.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 |
|
| 25.0 | 25.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | 25.0 |
|
| >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 | >50.0 |
| CIP | 0.780 | 0.195 | 0.780 | 0.0125 | 0.195 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 0.390 |
Ciprofloxacin was used as positive drug.