| Literature DB >> 33114586 |
Giuseppe Pietropaolo1, Daniela Pugliese2, Alessandro Armuzzi2, Luisa Guidi2, Antonio Gasbarrini2, Gian Lodovico Rapaccini2, Federica I Wolf1, Valentina Trapani1.
Abstract
Hypomagnesemia is very commonly observed in cancer patients, most frequently in association with therapy with cetuximab (CTX), a monoclonal antibody targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). CTX-induced hypomagnesemia has been ascribed to renal magnesium (Mg) wasting. Here, we sought to clarify whether CTX may also influence intestinal Mg absorption and if Mg supplementation may interfere with CTX activity. We used human colon carcinoma CaCo-2 cells as an in vitro model to study the mechanisms underlying Mg transport and CTX activity. Our findings demonstrate that TRPM6 is the key channel that mediates Mg influx in intestinal cells and that EGF stimulates such influx; consequently, CTX downregulates TRPM6-mediated Mg influx by interfering with EGF signaling. Moreover, we show that Mg supplementation does not modify either the CTX IC50 or CTX-dependent inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Our results suggest that reduced Mg absorption in the intestine may contribute to the severe hypomagnesemia that occurs in CTX-treated patients, and Mg supplementation may represent a safe and effective nutritional intervention to restore Mg status without impairing the CTX efficacy.Entities:
Keywords: EGFR; biomarker; colorectal cancer; hypomagnesemia; magnesium supplementation; monoclonal antibodies; targeted therapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33114586 PMCID: PMC7692710 DOI: 10.3390/nu12113277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1The TRPM6 channel mediates the Mg influx in human colon carcinoma cells. CaCo-2 cells were transiently silenced for TRPM6 (siRNA) and assessed 48h after transfection. Control cells (CTRL) received non-silencing scrambled siRNA. (a) Mg influx capacity in TRPM6-silenced (open circles) vs. control cells (solid circles), as assessed by the live imaging of Mag-Fluo-4-loaded cells; a representative experiment is shown. (b) TRPM6 protein expression in TRPM6-silenced and control cells, as evaluated by Western blot analysis; a representative blot is shown. (c) Quantification of TRPM6 protein expression by Western blot densitometry normalized to β-actin levels (n = 3, mean ± SD) in TRPM6-silenced (white bar) and control (black bar) cells. ** p < 0.01 by paired Student’s t-test. Full scans of original blots are available in Figure S1.
Figure 2Epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulates TRPM6 channel expression and Mg influx in human colon carcinoma cells. CaCo-2 cells were serum-starved for 24 h and exposed to EGF (10 ng/mL) and cetuximab (CTX, 70 μg/mL), either alone or in combination, for a further 24h. (a) Mg influx capacity, as assessed by the live imaging of Mag-Fluo-4-loaded cells; a representative experiment is shown. (b) TRPM6 protein expression, as evaluated by Western blot analysis; a representative blot is shown. (c) Quantification of TRPM6 protein expression by Western blot densitometry normalized to β-actin levels (n = 3, mean ± SD). Data sharing the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni’s test. Full scans of original blots are available in Figure S2.
Figure 3Mg supplementation does not affect cancer cell sensitivity to CTX. (a) A representative dose-response curve of CaCo-2 cells exposed to CTX (24 h) in control medium (0.8 mM of MgSO4, solid line and circles) or Mg-supplemented medium (5 mM of MgSO4, dotted line and open circles). (b) Phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 in CaCo2 cells challenged for 24h with EGF (10 ng/mL) with or without CTX (70 μg/mL) in control (0.8 mM of MgSO4) or Mg-supplemented (5 mM of MgSO4) medium, as assessed by Western blot analysis; a representative blot is shown. (c) Quantification of ERK1/2 phosphorylation by Western blot densitometry, normalized to total ERK1/2 levels (n = 3, mean ± SD). Two-way ANOVA indicated a very significant effect (p < 0.001) of EGF/CTX treatment, while Mg concentration had no significant effect (p = 0.70). The effect of CTX on unstimulated cells in control or Mg-supplemented medium is reported in Figure S3.