T Thangarasa1, J Gotfrit1, R A Goodwin1, P A Tang2, M Clemons1, A Imbulgoda3, M M Vickers1. 1. The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON. 2. Tom Baker Cancer Centre and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. 3. Jack Ady Cancer Centre and Alberta Health Services, Lethbridge, AB.
Abstract
Background: The optimal management of hypomagnesemia (hMg) induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (egfris) for advanced colorectal cancer is unclear. We surveyed gastrointestinal medical oncologists in Canada to determine practice patterns for the management of egfri-induced hMg. Methods: Based on distribution lists from the Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference and the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference, medical oncologists were invited to participate in an online questionnaire between November 2013 and February 2014. Results: From the 104 eligible physicians, 40 responses were obtained (38.5%). Panitumumab was more commonly prescribed than cetuximab by 70% of respondents, with 25% prescribing cetuximab and panitumumab equally. Most respondents obtain a serum magnesium level before initiating a patient on an egfri (92.5%) and before every treatment (90%). Most use a reactive strategy for magnesium supplementation (90%) and, when using supplementation, favour intravenous (iv) alone (40%) or iv and oral (45%) dosing. Magnesium sulfate was used for iv replacement, and the most common oral strategies were magnesium oxide (36.4%) and magnesium rougier (18.2%). Under the reactive strategy, intervention occurred at hMg grade 1 (70.3%) or grade 2 (27%). Of the survey respondents, 45% felt that 1-5 of their patients have ever developed symptoms attributable to hMg, and 35% have had to interrupt egfri therapy because of this toxicity, most commonly at grade 3 (30%) or grade 4 (45%) hMg. The most important question about egfri-induced hMg was its relevance to clinical outcomes (45%) and its symptoms (37.5%). Conclusions: In Canada, various strategies are used in the management of egfri-induced hMg, including prophylactic and reactive approaches that incorporate iv, oral, or a combination of iv and oral supplementation. Clinicians are concerned about the effect of hMg on clinical outcomes and about the symptoms that patients experience as a result of this toxicity.
Background: The optimal management of hypomagnesemia (hMg) induced by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (egfris) for advanced colorectal cancer is unclear. We surveyed gastrointestinal medical oncologists in Canada to determine practice patterns for the management of egfri-induced hMg. Methods: Based on distribution lists from the Eastern Canadian Colorectal Cancer Consensus Conference and the Western Canadian Gastrointestinal Cancer Consensus Conference, medical oncologists were invited to participate in an online questionnaire between November 2013 and February 2014. Results: From the 104 eligible physicians, 40 responses were obtained (38.5%). Panitumumab was more commonly prescribed than cetuximab by 70% of respondents, with 25% prescribing cetuximab and panitumumab equally. Most respondents obtain a serum magnesium level before initiating a patient on an egfri (92.5%) and before every treatment (90%). Most use a reactive strategy for magnesium supplementation (90%) and, when using supplementation, favour intravenous (iv) alone (40%) or iv and oral (45%) dosing. Magnesium sulfate was used for iv replacement, and the most common oral strategies were magnesium oxide (36.4%) and magnesium rougier (18.2%). Under the reactive strategy, intervention occurred at hMg grade 1 (70.3%) or grade 2 (27%). Of the survey respondents, 45% felt that 1-5 of their patients have ever developed symptoms attributable to hMg, and 35% have had to interrupt egfri therapy because of this toxicity, most commonly at grade 3 (30%) or grade 4 (45%) hMg. The most important question about egfri-induced hMg was its relevance to clinical outcomes (45%) and its symptoms (37.5%). Conclusions: In Canada, various strategies are used in the management of egfri-induced hMg, including prophylactic and reactive approaches that incorporate iv, oral, or a combination of iv and oral supplementation. Clinicians are concerned about the effect of hMg on clinical outcomes and about the symptoms that patients experience as a result of this toxicity.
Authors: Wouter M Tiel Groenestege; Stéphanie Thébault; Jenny van der Wijst; Dennis van den Berg; Rob Janssen; Sabine Tejpar; Lambertus P van den Heuvel; Eric van Cutsem; Joost G Hoenderop; Nine V Knoers; René J Bindels Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Di Maria Jiang; Kristopher Dennis; Andrew Steinmetz; Mark Clemons; Timothy R Asmis; Rachel A Goodwin; Michael M Vickers Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Anna Nasulewicz; Joanna Wietrzyk; Federica I Wolf; Stanisław Dzimira; Janusz Madej; Jeanette A M Maier; Yves Rayssiguier; Andrzej Mazur; Adam Opolski Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2004-12-24
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zhi-Guo Zou; Francisco J Rios; Karla B Neves; Rheure Alves-Lopes; Jiayue Ling; George S Baillie; Xing Gao; William Fuller; Livia L Camargo; Thomas Gudermann; Vladimir Chubanov; Augusto C Montezano; Rhian M Touyz Journal: Clin Sci (Lond) Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 6.124
Authors: Arif Awan; Bassam Basulaiman; Carol Stober; Mark Clemons; Dean Fergusson; John Hilton; Waleed Al Ghareeb; Rachel Goodwin; Mohammed Ibrahim; Brian Hutton; Lisa Vandermeer; Ranjeeta Mallick; Michael M Vickers Journal: Health Sci Rep Date: 2021-12-14