| Literature DB >> 33110149 |
Jianbin Liu1,2, Chao Yuan3,4, Tingting Guo3,4, Fan Wang5, Yufeng Zeng3, Xuezhi Ding3, Zengkui Lu3,4, Dingkao Renqing6, Hao Zhang7, Xilan Xu8, Yaojing Yue3,4, Xiaoping Sun3,4, Chune Niu3,4, Deqing Zhuoga9, Bohui Yang10,11.
Abstract
Most sheep breeding programs designed for the tropics and sub-tropics have to take into account the impacts of environmental adaptive traits. However, the genetic mechanism regulating the multiple biological processes driving adaptive responses remains unclear. In this study, we applied a selective sweep analysis by combing 1% top values of Fst and ZHp on both altitude and geographic subpopulations (APS) in 636 indigenous Tibetan sheep breeds. Results show that 37 genes were identified within overlapped genomic regions regarding Fst significantly associated with APS. Out of the 37 genes, we found that 8, 3 and 6 genes at chromosomes (chr.) 13, 23 and 27, respectively, were identified in the genomic regions with 1% top values of ZHp. We further analyzed the INDEL variation of 6 genes at chr.27 (X chromosome) in APS together with corresponding orthologs of 6 genes in Capra, Pantholops, and Bos Taurus. We found that an INDEL was located within 5'UTR region of HAG1 gene. This INDEL of HAG1 was strongly associated with the variation of APS, which was further confirmed by qPCR. Sheep breeds carrying "C-INDEL" of HAG1 have significantly greater body weight, shear amount, corpuscular hemoglobin and globulin levels, but lower body height, than those carrying "CA-INDEL" of HAG1. We concluded that "C-INDEL" variation of HAG1 gene confers better hypoxia tolerance in the highlands of Tibetan and explains well geographic distributions in this population. These results contribute to our understanding of adaptive responses to altitude and geographic adaptation in Tibetan sheep populations and will help to guide future conservation programs for Tibetan sheep native to Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33110149 PMCID: PMC7591910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75428-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Criterion of indigenous Tibetan sheep populations classified for different factors.
| Types | Parameters | Subpopulation |
|---|---|---|
| Altitude | < 3500 m | GD, QL, TJ, QH, MX, GJ, QK, GN |
| > 4500 m | LKZ, JZ, GB, HB, DM, AW, LZ | |
| Geographic locations | Qinghai | GD, QL, TJ |
| Gansu | QH, MX, GJ, QK, GN | |
| Tibetan | LKZ, JZ, GB, HB, DM, AW, LZ |
Sampling information for the 15 indigenous Tibetan sheep populations used in this study.
| Population | Population code | Sample number | Altitude (m) | Longitude and latitude | Sampling location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide Black Fur sheep | GD | 39 | 3100 | N:38°61′152″ E:103°32′160″ | Senduo Town, Guinan County, Hainan Tibetan Autonomous State, Qinghai Province |
| Qilian White Tibetan sheep | QL | 44 | 3540 | N:42°20′178″ E:116°64′618″ | Qilian Town, Qilian County, Delingha City, Mongolian Autonomous State, Qinghai Province |
| Tianjun White Tibetan sheep | TJ | 64 | 3217 | N:42°18′158″ E:116°42′210″ | Shengge Countryside, Tianjun County, Delingha City, Mongolian Autonomous State, Qinghai Province |
| Qinghai Oula Tibetan sheep | QH | 44 | 3630 | N:34°16′433″ E:101°32′141″ | Jianke Village, Kesheng Town, Henan Mongolian Autonomous County, Qinghai Province |
| Minxian Black Fur sheep | MX | 67 | 3180 | N:36°54′48″ E:103°94′107″ | Taizi Village, Qingshui Town, Minxian County, Dingxi City, Gansu Province |
| Ganjia Tibetan sheep | GJ | 58 | 3022 | N:35°32′49″ E:102°40′802″ | Xike Village, Ganjia Town, Xiahe County, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous State, Gansu Province |
| Qiaoke Tibetan sheep | QK | 71 | 3410 | N:35°42′106″ E:102°42′210″ | Waeryi Village, Qihama Town, Maqu County, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous State, Gansu Province |
| Gannan Oula Tibetan sheep | GN | 52 | 3616 | N:33°51′312″ E:101°52′424″ | Daerqing Administrative Village, Oula Town, Maqu County, Gannan Tibetan Autonomous State, Gansu Province |
| Langkazi Tibetan sheep | LKZ | 10 | 4459 | N:28°58′951″ E:090°23′757″ | Kexi Village, Langkazi Town, Langkazi County, Shannan Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Jiangzi Tibetan sheep | JZ | 46 | 4398 | N:28°55′113″ E:089°47′692″ | Reding Village, Cheren Town, Jiangzi County, Shannan Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Gangba Tibetan sheep | GB | 85 | 4403 | N:28°15′281″ E:088°24′787″ | Yulie Village, Gangba Town, Gangba County, Rikaze Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Huoba Tibetan sheep | HB | 34 | 4614 | N:30°13′822″ E:083°00′249″ | Rima Village, Huoba Town, Zhongba County, Rikaze Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Duoma Tibetan sheep | DM | 8 | 4780 | N:29°48′609″ E:091°36′191″ | Sixth Village, Maqu Town, Anduo County, Naqu Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Awang Tibetan sheep | AW | 5 | 4643 | N:30°12′101″ E:098°63′098″ | Ayi Third Village, Awang Town, Gongjue County, Changdou Territory of Tibet Autonomous Region |
| Linzhou Tibetan sheep | LZ | 9 | 4292 | N:29°09′121″ E:091°25′063″ | Tanggu Village, Tanggu Town, Linzhou County, Tibet Autonomous Region |
Figure 1SNP analysis and population structure for 15 indigenous Tibetan sheep populations. A: distributive map of 15 indigenous Tibetan sheep populations living in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau areas in China used in this study; The map inserted in panel A was referred to the Fig. 2 from Deng et al.[53] with slight modifications. B: Principal component analysis on SNP dataset after quality control in different Tibetan sheep populations; C: Distribution of minor allelic frequency (MAF) with 10 continued classes from 0–0.05 to 0.45–0.50; D: Relatedness of similarity index (IS) values in 15 Tibetan sheep populations.
Figure 2Manhattan analysis and candidate genes exploration. A-B: Manhattan plot representing F values for each SNP across Chromosomes for two subpopulations of altitude and geography. The genomic region with significant F values were highlighted in arrows. C: Venn diagram representing overlapped SNPs for two subpopulations of altitude and geography. D: Numbers of corresponding genes harboring overlapped SNPs for two subpopulations of altitude and geography. E: overlapped genes with 1% top values between F and ZHp.
Figure 3Gene INDEL analysis for 6 candidate overlapped genes at hetersomes within overlapped genomic regions by combing 1% top values of F and ZHp. A-F: INDEL analysis on 6 genes within clustered subpopulations in addition to three other species including Capra, Pantholops, and Bos taurus. The 6 genes were listed in Table S6.
Figure 4Comparison on sequence alignments and expression pattern between HAG1 and CSDE1. A: Secondary structure of HAG1 and differentiated amino acids between HAG1 and CSDE1. The location of 7 differentiated amino acids were depicted in symbol “*”, which are majorly on beta-strand and turn. Secondary structure of protein is predicted via Uniprot database from different PDB entries. B: Differentiated location of amino acids on representative 3D protein structure; C-D: Comparison on expression levels of CSDE1 and HAG1 in given 6 indigenous Tibetan sheep populations in this study. The 6 indigenous Tibetan sheep populations include Guide Black Fur sheep (GD), Qilian White Tibetan sheep (QL), Minxian Black Fur sheep (MX), Ganjia Tibetan sheep (GJ), Huoba Tibetan sheep (HB) and Awang Tibetan sheep (AW). Expression levels were calculated against GAPDH using mRNA from live and lung tissues, and four biological replicates were conducted.
Figure 5Comparison on morphological and physiological traits in 15 Tibetan sheep populations from 4 representative Tibetan sheep subpopulations (GD, QL, AW and HB), consisting of 122 samples with different INDEL of HAG1 gene. A: Representative picture of indigenous Tibetan sheep (Huoba Tibetan sheep, HB for “C-INDEL”, and Guide Black Fur sheep, GD for “CA-INDEL” originated between two haplotypes promoter of HAG1; B: Comparison on different physiological parameters of 15 Tibetan sheep between “CA-INDEL” and “C-INDEL” of HAG1. The first types include GD and QL, while the latter types include AW and HB. The averaged values for each parameter were derived from at least 10 biological replicates.