Literature DB >> 33109022

Inference of a universal social scale and segregation measures using social connectivity kernels.

Till Hoffmann1, Nick S Jones1.   

Abstract

How people connect with one another is a fundamental question in the social sciences, and the resulting social networks can have a profound impact on our daily lives. Blau offered a powerful explanation: people connect with one another based on their positions in a social space. Yet a principled measure of social distance, allowing comparison within and between societies, remains elusive. We use the connectivity kernel of conditionally independent edge models to develop a family of segregation statistics with desirable properties: they offer an intuitive and universal characteristic scale on social space (facilitating comparison across datasets and societies), are applicable to multivariate and mixed node attributes, and capture segregation at the level of individuals, pairs of individuals and society as a whole. We show that the segregation statistics can induce a metric on Blau space (a space spanned by the attributes of the members of society) and provide maps of two societies. Under a Bayesian paradigm, we infer the parameters of the connectivity kernel from 11 ego-network datasets collected in four surveys in the UK and USA. The importance of different dimensions of Blau space is similar across time and location, suggesting a macroscopically stable social fabric. Physical separation and age differences have the most significant impact on segregation within friendship networks with implications for intergenerational mixing and isolation in later stages of life.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ego networks; inference; segregation; social networks

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33109022      PMCID: PMC7653396          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  20 in total

1.  Mixing patterns in networks.

Authors:  M E J Newman
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-02-27

2.  Random measurement error and regression dilution bias.

Authors:  Jennifer A Hutcheon; Arnaud Chiolero; James A Hanley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata.

Authors:  Joshua Blumenstock; Gabriel Cadamuro; Robert On
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.

Authors:  Eytan Bakshy; Solomon Messing; Lada A Adamic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Spatially embedded random networks.

Authors:  L Barnett; E Di Paolo; S Bullock
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-11-20

6.  Homophily and Contagion Are Generically Confounded in Observational Social Network Studies.

Authors:  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi; Andrew C Thomas
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2011-05

7.  Extracting multistage screening rules from online dating activity data.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bruch; Fred Feinberg; Kee Yeun Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior.

Authors:  Michal Kosinski; David Stillwell; Thore Graepel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images.

Authors:  Yilun Wang; Michal Kosinski
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-02

10.  Inferring personal economic status from social network location.

Authors:  Shaojun Luo; Flaviano Morone; Carlos Sarraute; Matías Travizano; Hernán A Makse
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  2 in total

1.  Influencing dynamics on social networks without knowledge of network microstructure.

Authors:  Matthew Garrod; Nick S Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.293

2.  Inference and influence of network structure using snapshot social behavior without network data.

Authors:  Antonia Godoy-Lorite; Nick S Jones
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 14.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.