Literature DB >> 29389215

Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images.

Yilun Wang1, Michal Kosinski1.   

Abstract

We show that faces contain much more information about sexual orientation than can be perceived or interpreted by the human brain. We used deep neural networks to extract features from 35,326 facial images. These features were entered into a logistic regression aimed at classifying sexual orientation. Given a single facial image, a classifier could correctly distinguish between gay and heterosexual men in 81% of cases, and in 71% of cases for women. Human judges achieved much lower accuracy: 61% for men and 54% for women. The accuracy of the algorithm increased to 91% and 83%, respectively, given five facial images per person. Facial features employed by the classifier included both fixed (e.g., nose shape) and transient facial features (e.g., grooming style). Consistent with the prenatal hormone theory of sexual orientation, gay men and women tended to have gender-atypical facial morphology, expression, and grooming styles. Prediction models aimed at gender alone allowed for detecting gay males with 57% accuracy and gay females with 58% accuracy. Those findings advance our understanding of the origins of sexual orientation and the limits of human perception. Additionally, given that companies and governments are increasingly using computer vision algorithms to detect people's intimate traits, our findings expose a threat to the privacy and safety of gay men and women. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29389215     DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Artificial intelligence in psychiatry-an overview].

Authors:  A Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior.

Authors:  Andrea Ganna; Karin J H Verweij; John R B Perry; Benjamin M Neale; Brendan P Zietsch; Michel G Nivard; Robert Maier; Robbee Wedow; Alexander S Busch; Abdel Abdellaoui; Shengru Guo; J Fah Sathirapongsasuti; Paul Lichtenstein; Sebastian Lundström; Niklas Långström; Adam Auton; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Gary W Beecham; Eden R Martin; Alan R Sanders
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Inference of a universal social scale and segregation measures using social connectivity kernels.

Authors:  Till Hoffmann; Nick S Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Fertility Status Does Not Facilitate Women's Judgment of Male Sexual Orientation.

Authors:  Scott W Semenyna; Nicholas O Rule; Paul L Vasey
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 5.  Assessing Pain Research: A Narrative Review of Emerging Pain Methods, Their Technosocial Implications, and Opportunities for Multidisciplinary Approaches.

Authors:  Sara E Berger; Alexis T Baria
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02

6.  Understanding the Research Landscape of Deep Learning in Biomedical Science: Scientometric Analysis.

Authors:  Seojin Nam; Donghun Kim; Woojin Jung; Yongjun Zhu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 7.076

7.  Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing.

Authors:  Noortje Marres; David Stark
Journal:  Br J Sociol       Date:  2020-04-19

8.  Automatic identification of myopia based on ocular appearance images using deep learning.

Authors:  Yahan Yang; Ruiyang Li; Duoru Lin; Xiayin Zhang; Wangting Li; Jinghui Wang; Chong Guo; Jianyin Li; Chuan Chen; Yi Zhu; Lanqin Zhao; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

9.  The Future of Technology in Positive Psychology: Methodological Advances in the Science of Well-Being.

Authors:  David B Yaden; Johannes C Eichstaedt; John D Medaglia
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-18

10.  What demographic attributes do our digital footprints reveal? A systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne Hinds; Adam N Joinson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.