Robert J Macielak1, John P Marinelli2, Douglas J Totten3, Christine M Lohse4, Brandon R Grossardt4, Matthew L Carlson1,5. 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 2. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, San Antonio, Texas, USA. 3. Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 4. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. 5. Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether a history of pregnancy or bilateral oophorectomy is associated with subsequent otosclerosis development or disease severity. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. METHODS: Women diagnosed with otosclerosis were matched to 3 women without otosclerosis based on age and historical depth of medical records. Associations of prior delivery and bilateral oophorectomy with subsequent development of otosclerosis and with pure-tone average (PTA) at the time of otosclerosis diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: We studied 1196 women: 299 cases of otosclerosis and 897 matched controls. The odds ratio for the association of ≥1 delivery with otosclerosis was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.60; P = .35). Odds ratios for the associations of 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 deliveries with otosclerosis were 1.22 (0.83-1.80), 1.09 (0.71-1.68), 1.28 (0.77-2.12), and 1.00 (0.54-1.84), respectively. The odds ratio for the association of prior bilateral oophorectomy with otosclerosis was 1.12 (0.58-2.18; P = .73). In cases with otosclerosis, PTA at diagnosis was not significantly higher for women with ≥1 delivery as compared with those without (median 45 dB hearing loss [HL] [interquartile range {IQR} 36-55] vs 43 [IQR 34-53]; P = 0.18) but was significantly higher for women with bilateral oophorectomy compared with those without (median 54 dB HL [IQR 44-61] vs 44 [IQR 34-53]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: These data do not support a relationship between endogenous estrogen exposure and development of otosclerosis. Women with otosclerosis who had a history of pregnancy did not have significantly worse hearing at the time of diagnosis, suggesting that pregnancy is not associated with disease severity.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to determine whether a history of pregnancy or bilateral oophorectomy is associated with subsequent otosclerosis development or disease severity. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SETTING: Olmsted County, Minnesota. METHODS: Women diagnosed with otosclerosis were matched to 3 women without otosclerosis based on age and historical depth of medical records. Associations of prior delivery and bilateral oophorectomy with subsequent development of otosclerosis and with pure-tone average (PTA) at the time of otosclerosis diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS: We studied 1196 women: 299 cases of otosclerosis and 897 matched controls. The odds ratio for the association of ≥1 delivery with otosclerosis was 1.16 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-1.60; P = .35). Odds ratios for the associations of 1, 2, 3, or ≥4 deliveries with otosclerosis were 1.22 (0.83-1.80), 1.09 (0.71-1.68), 1.28 (0.77-2.12), and 1.00 (0.54-1.84), respectively. The odds ratio for the association of prior bilateral oophorectomy with otosclerosis was 1.12 (0.58-2.18; P = .73). In cases with otosclerosis, PTA at diagnosis was not significantly higher for women with ≥1 delivery as compared with those without (median 45 dB hearing loss [HL] [interquartile range {IQR} 36-55] vs 43 [IQR 34-53]; P = 0.18) but was significantly higher for women with bilateral oophorectomy compared with those without (median 54 dB HL [IQR 44-61] vs 44 [IQR 34-53]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: These data do not support a relationship between endogenous estrogen exposure and development of otosclerosis. Women with otosclerosis who had a history of pregnancy did not have significantly worse hearing at the time of diagnosis, suggesting that pregnancy is not associated with disease severity.
Authors: Walter A Rocca; Barbara P Yawn; Jennifer L St Sauver; Brandon R Grossardt; L Joseph Melton Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2012-11-28 Impact factor: 7.616