| Literature DB >> 33099312 |
Sara B Fournier1, Jeanine N D'Errico2, Derek S Adler3, Stamatina Kollontzi4, Michael J Goedken5, Laura Fabris4, Edward J Yurkow3, Phoebe A Stapleton6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Plastic is everywhere. It is used in food packaging, storage containers, electronics, furniture, clothing, and common single-use disposable items. Microplastic and nanoplastic particulates are formed from bulk fragmentation and disintegration of plastic pollution. Plastic particulates have recently been detected in indoor air and remote atmospheric fallout. Due to their small size, microplastic and nanoplastic particulate in the atmosphere can be inhaled and may pose a risk for human health, specifically in susceptible populations. When inhaled, nanosized particles have been shown to translocate across pulmonary cell barriers to secondary organs, including the placenta. However, the potential for maternal-to-fetal translocation of nanosized-plastic particles and the impact of nanoplastic deposition or accumulation on fetal health remain unknown. In this study we investigated whether nanopolystyrene particles can cross the placental barrier and deposit in fetal tissues after maternal pulmonary exposure.Entities:
Keywords: Fetal; Maternal; Nanoplastics; Perfusion; Polystyrene; Pregnancy; Translocation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33099312 PMCID: PMC7585297 DOI: 10.1186/s12989-020-00385-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol ISSN: 1743-8977 Impact factor: 9.400
Effect of maternal nanopolystyrene pulmonary exposure on litter characteristics
| Treatment | Maternal Weight (g) | Number of Fetuses per Litter | Fetal Weight (g) | Placental Weight (g) | Placental Efficiency | Number of Resorption Sites | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 | 358 ± 12 | 13.1 ± 0.4 | 2.71 ± 0.05 | 0.48 ± 0.01 | 5.57 ± 0.26 | 0.42 ± 0.14 | |
| 11 | 382 ± 21 | 12.6 ± 0.6 | *2.51 ± 0.06 | *0.43 ± 0.01 | 5.79 ± 0.22 | *1.13 ± 0.30 |
Values are shown as mean ± SEM
n number of dams. Statistics were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance (*p ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 1Schematic of nanoplastic exposure and dosimetry. a We utilized a 1 mm2 microparticle as a representative microplastic (blue). The extrapolation of this microplastic microparticle to a nanoparticle is 1 × 106. Our representative nanopolystyrene nanobeads are spherical and 21 nm in diameter (red). Therefore, there would be 2.39 × 1014 nanopolystyrene beads in a single plastic microparticle. b Cox et al. identified that women inhale an average of 132 microplastics. The upper bound of this measurement (279 microplastics), is more representative of exposure for pregnant women. The calculated dosage is 6.67 × 1016 nanopolystyrene beads. c The surface area of the Sprague Dawley rat lung is significantly smaller (0.409 m2) compared with the human lung (62.7 m2). The calculated dose for a laboratory rat is 4.34 × 1014. The exposure dose used in these studies was 2.64 × 1014 nanopolystyrene beads
Fig. 2Optical images of maternal and fetal tissues. Graphical representation of the optical intensities between a maternal and b fetal control and exposed tissues. n = 6–8 pregnant rats. Values are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistics were analyzed with a Student’s t-test. (*p ≤ 0.05; T ≤ 0.10)
Fig. 3Identification and visualization of nanopolystyrene particle deposition within the fetal tissues placenta after material pulmonary exposure using enhanced hyperspectral microscopy (CytoViva, Inc.). These tissues include fetal a liver, b lung, c kidney, d heart, and e brain. n = 3 fetuses from 3 different pregnant rats. Polystyrene nanoparticles are identified as white specs within the images
Fig. 4Identification of rhodamine-labeled nanopolystyrene bead translocation based on increased fluorescence through the a distal uterine effluent and b umbilical vein effluent over time. n = 9–24. c Time-course of fluid flow through the umbilical vein between saline (black) and nanopolystyrene (red) infused placenta. n = 6–8. Values are shown as mean ± SEM and presented as percent above baseline. Statistics were analyzed with Student’s t-test (*p ≤ 0.05; T ≤ 0.10)