Literature DB >> 27877820

Transfer studies of polystyrene nanoparticles in the ex vivo human placenta perfusion model: key sources of artifacts.

Stefanie Grafmueller1, Pius Manser2, Liliane Diener2, Lionel Maurizi3, Pierre-André Diener4, Heinrich Hofmann3, Wolfram Jochum4, Harald F Krug5, Tina Buerki-Thurnherr2, Ursula von Mandach6, Peter Wick2.   

Abstract

Nanotechnology is a rapidly expanding and highly promising new technology with many different fields of application. Consequently, the investigation of engineered nanoparticles in biological systems is steadily increasing. Questions about the safety of such engineered nanoparticles are very important and the most critical subject with regard to the penetration of biological barriers allowing particle distribution throughout the human body. Such translocation studies are technically challenging and many issues have to be considered to obtain meaningful and comparable results. Here we report on the transfer of polystyrene nanoparticles across the human placenta using an ex vivo human placenta perfusion model. We provide an overview of several challenges that can potentially occur in any translocation study in relation to particle size distribution, functionalization and stability of labels. In conclusion, a careful assessment of nanoparticle properties in a physiologically relevant milieu is as challenging and important as the actual study of nanoparticle-cell interactions itself.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological barrier; material characterization; nanoparticles

Year:  2015        PMID: 27877820      PMCID: PMC5090179          DOI: 10.1088/1468-6996/16/4/044602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater        ISSN: 1468-6996            Impact factor:   8.090


Introduction

The field of nanotechnology is growing continuously and nanomedicine is a particular intense research area [1]. To understand the interactions of nanoparticles (NPs) with cells and their biodistribution is a pre-requisite for medical applications such as using NPs as carriers to deliver a drug to a specific target cell or organ. In addition, a better knowledge of the transfer of nanoparticles across external and internal tissue barriers is also of key relevance for the safe design of industrially relevant NPs [2]. It has been shown that the physicochemical properties of NPs determine their fate in biological systems [3, 4]. Different NP characteristics could lead to a selective coating with various biomolecules and thereby inducing distinct cellular responses [5]. Therefore, an extensive particle characterization is indispensable. Researchers suggested analyzing particle size, size distribution, agglomeration state, stability, NP composition, endotoxin contamination, sample purity, batch-to-batch consistency, surface coating and reactivity [6, 7]. In addition, OECD and/or the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) have specified a comprehensive list of physical chemical endpoints for complete nanomaterial characterization [8, 9]. There is already an increased awareness that these features should be examined not only in water, but also in physiologically relevant media, which are used in the respective experimental set-ups [6, 7]. However, in many cases properties such as dye elution, agglomeration behavior or NP stability in vivo cannot be predicted by in vitro testing using cell culture media, because the composition of biological fluids outside and inside cells is more complex. In such situations, NP stability has to be assessed directly in the desired biological model. Here, we want to present a brief case report about the practical challenges which emerged during our investigations of NP transport across the human placenta as an example of a biological barrier tissue. To assess transplacental translocation of NPs and to determine the physicochemical properties responsible for placental transfer, NPs with different characteristics are required. We chose polystyrene (PS) beads as model particles because they are commercially available in numerous sizes and with different surface modifications. The use of such commercial PS beads is widely established and the manufacturers already provide information about the NP characteristics. So, it is assumed that confirmation of such information for one random sample of one supplier is sufficient. Furthermore, to visualize and measure particle concentrations in a biologic environment such as that of the human placenta an easy detectable label is highly convenient. PS beads are available labeled with a range of different fluorescent dyes of high intensity and photostability. We evaluated plain, carboxylate- and amine-modified PS beads with different fluorescent labels to study placental translocation in the human ex vivo placental perfusion model.

Materials and methods

Particles

An overview of all fluorescently labeled PS beads used in this study is provided in table 1. Numbers were assigned to each type of bead according to its functionalization. Yellow-green-labeled non-functionalized (plain) PS beads with sizes of 87 (P1) and 504 nm (P2), and carboxylated PS beads (COOH) with sizes of 100.8 (C1) and 533.8 nm (C2) were purchased from Polysciences Inc. (Warrington, PA, USA). GreenF-labeled, amine-modified (NH2) 100 (N1) and 250 nm (N3) PS beads were purchased from micromod Partikeltechnologie GmbH (Rostock, D). Yellow-labeled, amine-modified 170 (N2) and 530 nm (N4) PS beads were purchased from Spherotech (Lake Forest, IL, USA). Envy green-labeled, amine-modified 60 (N5), 250 (N6) and 510 nm (N7) PS beads were customized synthesized from Bangs Laboratories Inc. (Fishers, IN, USA). Orange amine-modified 110 nm (N8) PS beads were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Table 1.

Summary of PS beads characteristics.

Plain
Carboxylate-modified
Amine-modified
P1P2C1C2N1N2N3N4N5N6N7N8
Diameter (nm)a 8750410153410017025053060250510110
Diameter (nm)b in TEM78 ± 20455 ± 3289 ± 3499 ± 888 ± 7160 ± 5224 ± 17494 ± 2963 ± 10181 ± 11451 ± 2871 ± 11
Hydrodynamic diameter in DD water (nm)c 97 ± 1445 ± 13389 ± 1475 ± 143n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.78 ± 1202 ± 2445 ± 143n.d.
Hydrodynamic diameter in PM (nm)c 132 ± 3621 ± 157130 ± 1619 ± 187n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.112 ± 1328 ± 2658 ± 9n.d.
Initial no. of particles/mL in PMd 9.55 · 10104.82 · 1086.49 · 10103.66 · 1086.58 · 10101.11 · 10104.02 · 1093.78 · 1081.86 · 10117.66· · 1094.97 · 1081.29 · 1011
Particle surface (nm2)/mL in PMd 1.83 · 1093.14 · 1081.61 · 1092.86 · 1081.62 · 1098.93 · 1086.37 · 1082.89 · 1082.29 · 1097.89 · 1083.17 · 1082.02 · 109
Detection limit in PM (μg/mL)<0.078<0.21<0.078<0.039n.d.n.d.<2.5<0.02<0.078<0.078<0.039n.d.
Zeta potential in 10 mM NaCl (mV)b −50 ± 9.7−46.9 ± 4.0−38.2 ± 10.4−55.6 ± 4.3n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.−30.2 ± 8.2−36.2 ± 4.4−38.9 ± 2.7n.d.
Zeta potential in PM (mV)b −13.1 ± 7.2−14.5 ± 6.6−13.1 ± 10.1−15.3 ± 8.3n.d.n.d.n.d.n.d.−12.7 ± 5.4−14.1 ± 9.9−17.3 ± 5.7n.d.
Fluorescent dyeYellow greenYellow greenYellow greenYellow greenGreenFYellowGreenFYellowEnvy greenEnvy greenEnvy greenOrange
Dye excitation/ emission (nm)485/528485/528485/528485/528475/510485/520475/510485/520525/565525/565525/565481/644
Number of perfusions334410433331

Abbreviations: DD double distilled; PM perfusion medium; TEM transmission electron microscopy; n.d. not determined

According to the manufacturer’s information.

Experimentally determined (mean ± SD).

Experimentally determined (mode ± SD).

Calculated values.

Summary of PS beads characteristics. Abbreviations: DD double distilled; PM perfusion medium; TEM transmission electron microscopy; n.d. not determined According to the manufacturer’s information. Experimentally determined (mean ± SD). Experimentally determined (mode ± SD). Calculated values.

Particle characterization

The zeta potential of the PS beads in 10 mM sodium chloride and perfusion medium (PM) at pH between 6.8 and 7.2 was determined with a Zetasizer NanoZS (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). Particle size distribution of PS beads in double distilled (DD) water and PM was determined by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA; NanoSight LM 20 System, software version 2.3.5, NanoSight Ltd, Amesbury, UK) as described previously [10]. The DD water and PM were filtered through a 0.02 μm Anotop® 25 syringe filter (Whatman GmbH, Germany) prior to analysis. For comparison of the different NPs the results were normalized to the area under the NP concentration/size curve.

Stability of fluorescent dye

The detection limit of the fluorescence of PS beads was determined as described previously [11]. To assess the stability of fluorescence the loss of fluorescence intensity was analyzed after incubation of the PS beads in PM at 37 °C for 3, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h using a microplate reader (Biotek Synergy HT, Winooski, VT, USA) with excitation and emission wavelengths as indicated in table 1. The leakage of fluorescence was assessed at the indicated time points during 72 h at 37 °C in PM and in samples from the maternal circulation after 3 and 6 h of placenta perfusion by measuring the fluorescence before and after filtration through a 0.1 μm syringe filter.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

PS bead suspensions as supplied by the manufacturer were applied onto a carbon-coated copper grid and processed for TEM analysis. Images were taken with a Zeiss EM 900 TEM (Zeiss SMT, Oberkochen, Germany) at 80 kV.

Ex vivo human placental perfusion model

The placentas were obtained from uncomplicated term pregnancies after caesarean section at the Department of Obstetrics, Zurich University Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained prior to delivery. The project was approved by the local ethics committee and performed in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The placenta perfusion was performed as described previously [11, 12]. The PM contained M199 tissue culture medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted with Earl’s buffer (dilution 1: 2), 1 g L−1 glucose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10 g L−1 bovine serum albumin (AppliChem GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany), 10 g L−1 dextran 40 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2500 IU/L sodium heparin (B. Braun Medical AG, Melsungen, Germany), 250 mg L−1 amoxicillin (GlaxoSmithKline AG, Brentford, UK) and 2.2 g L−1 sodium bicarbonate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Placental perfusion was started by adding 25 μg mL−1 PS beads into the maternal circulation. The concentration of the PS beads in the fetal and maternal circuit was determined by fluorescence measurement in a microplate reader (Biotek Synergy HT, Winooski, VT, USA). Particle concentrations were corrected for the PM volume in the tubes and volume loss due to sampling before placental transfer was calculated as percentage of transferred PS beads compared to the initially added particle amount.

Fluorescence microscopy

Tissue samples of perfused placentas were fixed in 4% formaldehyde (Formafix AG, Hittnau, Switzerland), dehydrated overnight in a Medite Tissue Processor TPC 15 and embedded in paraffin blocks with the Medite Tissue Embedding System TES 99. Unstained 4 μm thick paraffin sections of perfused placenta were deparaffinized with xylene followed by ethanol 100%. Afterwards the slides were air-dried, covered with VECTASHIELD® Mounting Medium containing DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) on a glass slide and the coverslips were sealed with a slide sealant. The slides were analyzed with a Leica DM6000B fluorescence microscope system (Leica Microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) equipped with a triple band-pass filter set (DAPI/Spectrum Green/Spectrum Orange).

Ninhydrin assay

Next, 20 mM ninhydrin (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland) solution in ethanol was added to 1 mg mL−1 PS−1 bead suspension. After 30 min at 80 °C and 300 rpm absorption at 550 nm was measured in a microplate reader (Biotek Synergy HT, Winooski, VT, USA) [13].

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) from at least three independent experiments. The unpaired Student’s t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism software, version 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences were considered statistically significant at a p-value below 0.05.

Results and discussion

NPs were carefully characterized and their properties are displayed in table 1. Some amine-modified PS beads were not completely characterized, because they already showed instability in preliminary experiments and could not be used for further studies. During our investigations we encountered different problems, which did not allow us to conduct a reasonable NP translocation study. A brief overview of the practical challenges during evaluation of the different NP types is provided in table 2 and the topics, particle size, surface modification and charge as well as dye stability, will be discussed extensively.
Table 2.

Summary of the encountered problems for each PS bead type.

Summary of the encountered problems for each PS bead type.

Particle size

To unambiguously identify the influence of NP size on placental translocation, a monodisperse suspension is a prerequisite. During evaluation of PS beads for our study, we experienced that obtaining PS beads with a narrow size distribution is quite challenging. Often particle suspensions are contaminated to some extent with beads of a smaller diameter than stated by the manufacturer (figure 1). The TEM micrographs in figure 1(a) illustrate that the PS beads P1, P2, N2, N5 and N8 actually contained particles with various sizes whereas the manufacturer declared one size determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS). DLS measures the average hydrodynamic diameter (d) of particles and the intensity of the scattered light is proportional to d6 (the diameter raised to the power of 6). This term means that a 500 nm particle will scatter 106 times more light than a 50 nm particle. Therefore, DLS measurement is usually biased towards large particles and often prevents the detection of small NPs in polydisperse mixtures. An alternative method for such mixtures is nanoparticle-tracking analysis (NanoSight). This method does not determine the average particle size, but tracks the movement of individual particles in a fluid on a particle-by-particle basis, and thus allows a discrimination of differently sized particles in a polydisperse suspension. However, analyzing particle size distribution by nanoparticle tracking analysis only detected the contamination with smaller beads for larger beads such as P2 (about 500 nm), while PS beads with a diameter around 50 nm such as N5 were already at the detection limit of this method (figure 1(b)). Similar observations that the manufacturer’s size information needs to be confirmed preferably by a complementary technique have been made for other NPs [14].
Figure 1.

(a) TEM micrographs of PS bead suspensions in DD water with low and high magnification (upper left corner). (b) Size distribution of PS beads in DD water and PM was determined by nanoparticle-tracking analysis.

(a) TEM micrographs of PS bead suspensions in DD water with low and high magnification (upper left corner). (b) Size distribution of PS beads in DD water and PM was determined by nanoparticle-tracking analysis.

Surface modification and charge

Specific particle shells or surface coatings are added to NPs for example to prevent aggregation or to provoke a specific effect in vivo. In addition, such coatings are also important parameters by which to induce toxicity or accelerate transport into cells or across barriers [15]. In order to determine the influence of NP surface modification and charge on placental transfer, it is crucial to confirm the presence of these functionalized groups. In ex vivo placenta perfusion studies, we observed a difference in placental transport between plain, carboxylate-modified and amine-modified PS beads (figure 2). Plain PS beads (P1 and P2) but not the amine-modified N5, N6 and N7 PS beads were transported across the placental barrier suggesting that the surface modification is a major determinant of placental translocation (figure 2(d)). Zeta potential measurements revealed that, contrary to expectations, these amine-modified NPs were negatively charged in the entire pH range 3–10. Since the fluorescent dye in the particles is slightly negatively charged, it might be that the density of the amine functionalization on the PS beads was not high enough to cause a positive zeta potential. Besides an insufficient functionalization, the particle suspensions could also contain residues of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). SDS was used as surfactant during synthesis of at least some of the used PS beads and is negatively charged. Small residual amounts of SDS in combination with a low amine group density could explain the negative zeta potential. Hence, a direct detection of the chemical amine group would be required, but the attempt to detect the amine groups on the particle surface by the colorimetric ninhydrin assay failed due to NP interference with the assay. Primary amine groups react with ninhydrin and form a purple compound, which leads to an increased absorbance at 570 nm. The internal fluorescence of the PS beads caused a false positive signal and thus, a difference in intensity before and after ninhydrin treatment could not be observed (figure 3). Consequently, the ninhydrin assay is not suitable to confirm the presence of functional amine groups attached to fluorescently labeled NPs and analytical methods such as infrared spectroscopy may be considered for further studies.
Figure 2.

(a), (b) Perfusion profiles after ex vivo human placental perfusion of amine-modified PS beads N1 (n = 1), N3 (n = 4), N4 (n = 3), N5, N6, N7 (all n = 3), N8 (n = 1). (c) Perfusion profiles of plain and carboxylate-modified PS beads P1, P2, C1 and C2 of at least 3 independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean particle concentration (μg mL–1) in the fetal (F) and maternal (M) circulation determined by fluorescence measurement at the indicated time points ± SD. The red line indicates the initially added concentration of PS beads (25 μg mL−1). (d) Percentage of plain and carboxylate-modified PS beads (P1, P2, C1, C2) in the fetal circulation after 6 h of perfusion compared to the initially added particle amount (mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments). (∗) p < 0.05, (∗∗) p < 0.01.

Figure 3.

To assess the presence of amino groups on the surface of PS beads N5, N6 and N7, a ninhydrin assay was performed. The amino acid glycine served as positive control. Absorption was determined at 550 nm and mean ± SD of 2 technical replicates is displayed.

(a), (b) Perfusion profiles after ex vivo human placental perfusion of amine-modified PS beads N1 (n = 1), N3 (n = 4), N4 (n = 3), N5, N6, N7 (all n = 3), N8 (n = 1). (c) Perfusion profiles of plain and carboxylate-modified PS beads P1, P2, C1 and C2 of at least 3 independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean particle concentration (μg mL–1) in the fetal (F) and maternal (M) circulation determined by fluorescence measurement at the indicated time points ± SD. The red line indicates the initially added concentration of PS beads (25 μg mL−1). (d) Percentage of plain and carboxylate-modified PS beads (P1, P2, C1, C2) in the fetal circulation after 6 h of perfusion compared to the initially added particle amount (mean ± SD of at least 3 independent experiments). (∗) p < 0.05, (∗∗) p < 0.01. To assess the presence of amino groups on the surface of PS beads N5, N6 and N7, a ninhydrin assay was performed. The amino acid glycine served as positive control. Absorption was determined at 550 nm and mean ± SD of 2 technical replicates is displayed.

In vitro and ex vivo elution of fluorescent dyes

Several studies have demonstrated that a fluorescent dye can elute from NPs after contact with biological fluids [16-19]. Therefore, we tested the stability of the fluorescent signal of the PS beads after incubation at 37 °C for up to 72 h in PM. The fluorescence intensity of the greenF-labeled N3 and the yellow-green C1 PS beads remained completely stable over 72 h and only the N3 PS beads showed an elution of fluorescent dye from the particles (43.1% ± 9.3% of total fluorescence intensity was from free fluorescent dye after 24 h) (figure 4(b)). For all other PS beads the fluorescence intensity decreased to 60–80% of the initial signal after 72 h (figure 4(a)). Figure 4(b) indicates that this loss in fluorescence intensity was not due to a significant leakage of fluorescent dye except for the envy-green-labeled N6 PS beads, which showed a transient release of dye after 24 h (25.3% ± 5.2%). Due to technical issues, PS beads with a diameter of 100 nm and below could not be analyzed for fluorescence leakage. Syringe filters with a smaller pore size than 0.1 μm, which are required to separate the free fluorescent dye from the particles, were not applicable because components of the PM led to a clogging of the filter. The overall reduction of the measured fluorescence intensity for most of the PS beads (P1, P2, C2, N4, N5, N6, N7) after incubation in PM is unclear but might be caused by adsorption of albumin or other components of the medium to the NPs, which might impair the fluorescence signal. In addition, unspecific binding of the particles to the tissue culture plastics or particle agglomeration and subsequent sedimentation may explain the overall loss in fluorescence intensity over prolonged exposure in PM.
Figure 4.

(a) Stability of the fluorescent signal of PS beads in PM at 37 °C over 72 h. The figure displays the percentage of initial fluorescence intensity at several time points compared to the initial fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD; n = 3). b) Leakage of the fluorescent dye from the large PS beads (>150 nm) during 72 h at 37 °C in PM. Data are expressed as percentage of free fluorescence compared to the total fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD; n = 3). (c) Elution of fluorescent dye of the large PS beads after 3 and 6 h of ex vivo placental perfusion. Data are expressed as percentage of free fluorescence compared to the total fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD of at least 2 independent experiments).

(a) Stability of the fluorescent signal of PS beads in PM at 37 °C over 72 h. The figure displays the percentage of initial fluorescence intensity at several time points compared to the initial fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD; n = 3). b) Leakage of the fluorescent dye from the large PS beads (>150 nm) during 72 h at 37 °C in PM. Data are expressed as percentage of free fluorescence compared to the total fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD; n = 3). (c) Elution of fluorescent dye of the large PS beads after 3 and 6 h of ex vivo placental perfusion. Data are expressed as percentage of free fluorescence compared to the total fluorescence intensity (mean ± SD of at least 2 independent experiments). Although dye elution was not a major problem for most PS beads after incubation in PM, it became an important issue after contact with the human placenta. During placenta perfusion the greenF-labeled N1 and N3 PS beads showed an unexpected perfusion profile (figure 2(a)). After addition of 25 μg mL−1 PS bead into the maternal circulation, the total concentration (fetal and maternal circuit) seemed to increase above the initially added NP concentration. Further analysis of samples from the fetal and maternal circulation after 6 h of perfusion revealed that 47.9% ± 8.3% of the fluorescent dye was leaking out of the greenF-labeled N3 PS particles (figure 4(c)). Although the perfusion profile of the yellow-labeled N4 PS particles appeared more rational, the filtration also showed 36.4% ± 33.8% leakage of the fluorescent dye after 6 h of perfusion (figures 4(c) and 2(a)). According to the particle supplier, the fluorescence in the particles is partially quenched because of the heavy dye loading; thus we suggest that the perfusion profile showed an increased fluorescence in the maternal circuit due to the fact that the free dye generates a higher fluorescence. Consequently, the increased fluorescence intensity in the fetal circulation was likely due to the rapid transfer of the free dye across the placental barrier. GreenF and yellow are fluorescein derivatives and it has been shown that such small hydrophobic chemical compounds can easily cross the placenta [20]. Regardless of the fluorescence leakage, analysis of histological sections of placental tissue after perfusion by fluorescence microscopy still showed fluorescent particles in the syncytiotrophoblast and the villous mesenchyme (figure 5). We were not able to detect a difference in fluorescence distribution within the cells as described previously for rhodamine labeled N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) NPs. These NPs were found to elute dye and the free dye was spread in the whole cell and particle-bound dye was only restricted to organelles such as lysosomes [18]. According to the NP suppliers the water insoluble fluorescent dyes were incorporated in the glassy polymer matrix after swelling in an appropriate solvent and are not chemically bound in the particle or to the surface. Therefore all dyes should remain entrapped in an aqueous environment. However, as in every biological environment, the placental tissue consists of several compartments with different pH values and contains different proteins or lipids. It is known that dyes can elute from NPs after contact with a hydrophobic milieu in a cell [16, 17]. The plasma membrane of a cell retains an enormous hydrophobic area which is especially enlarged in the human placenta compared to other organs. The brush border membrane of the placental syncytiotrophoblast, which is in contact with the maternal blood, forms numerous microvilli to gain a huge surface for effective exchange of nutrients and waste products [21]. Hence, the possibility of NP contact with the hydrophobic membrane in the placenta is much higher than in other biological tissues and therefore the probability of dye elution is increased. Of note, the placenta is an organ with an increased enzymatic and metabolic activity due to its physiological function to protect the fetus and detoxify harmful substances [22, 23]. So it could also be conceivable that parts of the greenF and yellow amine-modified PS particles were degraded by the placental cells which led to the release of the fluorescent dye. Since this phenomenon could not be observed with the non-functionalized and carboxylate-modified PS beads this fluorescence leakage seems to be dependent on the surface modification. However, examinations with amine-modified N5, N6, N7 and N8 PS beads containing a different fluorescent dye (envy green and orange) revealed a fraction of only 3.9% ± 5.2% and 11.2% ± 9.1% free dye after 6 h of perfusion for N6 and N7 nm PS beads, respectively, indicating that dye elution depends mainly on the properties of the fluorescent dye (figures 4(c) and 2(b)).
Figure 5.

Fluorescence microscopy of placental tissue after 6 h of ex vivo perfusion. Displayed are images from representative placenta perfusion experiments with two amine-modified PS beads (N3 and N4), which showed fluorescent dye leakage, and one amine-modified PS particle representative for an NP without fluorescence leakage (N6). As control placental perfusion without addition of particles was performed. Micrographs show PS beads (green) and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). Due to autofluorescence, erythrocytes appear also in green. Red arrows indicate accumulated PS beads.

Fluorescence microscopy of placental tissue after 6 h of ex vivo perfusion. Displayed are images from representative placenta perfusion experiments with two amine-modified PS beads (N3 and N4), which showed fluorescent dye leakage, and one amine-modified PS particle representative for an NP without fluorescence leakage (N6). As control placental perfusion without addition of particles was performed. Micrographs show PS beads (green) and DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). Due to autofluorescence, erythrocytes appear also in green. Red arrows indicate accumulated PS beads. In conclusion, our study shows that a careful assessment of NP size distribution, modification and fluorescent dye leakage under physiological conditions is essential to prevent artifacts in placental translocation studies using fluorescent PS beads. However, additional NP properties may become relevant for other types of NPs. For soluble NPs such as various metal oxides, it is important to understand particle dissolution to be able to distinguish between uptake and/or translocation of NPs, particle fragments or dissolved ions. A recent NP translocation study in rats demonstrated that it is of key relevance to perform such NP dissolution studies under in vivo-like conditions [24]. In this work, the fast clearance of inhaled BaSO4 NPs did not correlate with its very low dissolution rate in phagolysosomal simulant fluid (PSF) [24], a proposed model of macrophage dissolution/clearance of particles. The authors conclude that the currently used cell-free in vitro dissolution studies either lack crucial constituents or do not adequately simulate the processes that facilitate particle dissolution and increase bioavailability. Another important characteristic in particular for engineered nanoparticles is particle agglomeration. A recent review identified that NP agglomeration affects translocation across tissue barriers as well as uptake and intracellular distribution within the cells [25].

Conclusions

From the current literature it appears that NP translocation studies across biological barriers are easy to design and relatively straightforward to perform. Here, we provide for the first time an extensive overview of important practical challenges that can occur in such studies using fluorescently labeled PS NPs. A careful validation of NP characteristics such as size distribution and fluorescent dye leakage after contact with biological fluids and stability of surface modifications is crucial in order to obtain meaningful results. To understand how NP characteristics such as size, surface charge and chemistry determine placental transport, cellular responses and uptake mechanisms their physicochemical properties have to be carefully analyzed in physiologically relevant conditions in the selected biological systems. Despite the increasing commercial availability of various NPs with distinct characteristics, the extensive re-characterization of NP properties is indispensable and requires a similar effort as the investigation of the nanoparticle–cell interactions itself. Hence, such studies are a real interdisciplinary challenge.
  22 in total

1.  Common pitfalls in nanotechnology: lessons learned from NCI's Nanotechnology Characterization Laboratory.

Authors:  Rachael M Crist; Jennifer Hall Grossman; Anil K Patri; Stephan T Stern; Marina A Dobrovolskaia; Pavan P Adiseshaiah; Jeffrey D Clogston; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.192

2.  Principles for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategy.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Andrew Maynard; Ken Donaldson; Vincent Castranova; Julie Fitzpatrick; Kevin Ausman; Janet Carter; Barbara Karn; Wolfgang Kreyling; David Lai; Stephen Olin; Nancy Monteiro-Riviere; David Warheit; Hong Yang
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.400

3.  Nanoparticle size and surface properties determine the protein corona with possible implications for biological impacts.

Authors:  Martin Lundqvist; Johannes Stigler; Giuliano Elia; Iseult Lynch; Tommy Cedervall; Kenneth A Dawson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface.

Authors:  Andre E Nel; Lutz Mädler; Darrell Velegol; Tian Xia; Eric M V Hoek; Ponisseril Somasundaran; Fred Klaessig; Vince Castranova; Mike Thompson
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2009-06-14       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 5.  Nanoparticulate drug delivery in pregnancy: placental passage and fetal exposure.

Authors:  Vinith Menezes; Antoine Malek; Jeffrey A Keelan
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.837

6.  Determination of the transport rate of xenobiotics and nanomaterials across the placenta using the ex vivo human placental perfusion model.

Authors:  Stefanie Grafmüller; Pius Manser; Harald F Krug; Peter Wick; Ursula von Mandach
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Experimental and theoretical comparison of intracellular import of polymeric nanoparticles and small molecules: toward models of uptake kinetics.

Authors:  Anna Salvati; Christoffer Aberg; Tiago dos Santos; Juan Varela; Paulo Pinto; Iseult Lynch; Kenneth A Dawson
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 8.  Nanomedicine--challenge and perspectives.

Authors:  Kristina Riehemann; Stefan W Schneider; Thomas A Luger; Biana Godin; Mauro Ferrari; Harald Fuchs
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 9.  Placental ABC transporters, cellular toxicity and stress in pregnancy.

Authors:  Irving L M H Aye; Jeffrey A Keelan
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.192

10.  Barrier capacity of human placenta for nanosized materials.

Authors:  Peter Wick; Antoine Malek; Pius Manser; Danielle Meili; Xenia Maeder-Althaus; Liliane Diener; Pierre-Andre Diener; Andreas Zisch; Harald F Krug; Ursula von Mandach
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  11 in total

1.  Nanoparticle Properties for Delivery to Cartilage: The Implications of Disease State, Synovial Fluid, and Off-Target Uptake.

Authors:  Shannon Brown; Jake Pistiner; Isaac M Adjei; Blanka Sharma
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Label-free detection of uptake, accumulation, and translocation of diesel exhaust particles in ex vivo perfused human placenta.

Authors:  Eva Bongaerts; Leonie Aengenheister; Battuja B Dugershaw; Pius Manser; Maarten B J Roeffaers; Marcel Ameloot; Tim S Nawrot; Hannelore Bové; Tina Buerki-Thurnherr
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 3.  Particle toxicology and health - where are we?

Authors:  Michael Riediker; Daniele Zink; Wolfgang Kreyling; Günter Oberdörster; Alison Elder; Uschi Graham; Iseult Lynch; Albert Duschl; Gaku Ichihara; Sahoko Ichihara; Takahiro Kobayashi; Naomi Hisanaga; Masakazu Umezawa; Tsun-Jen Cheng; Richard Handy; Mary Gulumian; Sally Tinkle; Flemming Cassee
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 9.400

4.  Translocation of (ultra)fine particles and nanoparticles across the placenta; a systematic review on the evidence of in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Eva Bongaerts; Tim S Nawrot; Thessa Van Pee; Marcel Ameloot; Hannelore Bové
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 9.400

5.  A Children's Health Perspective on Nano- and Microplastics.

Authors:  Kam Sripada; Aneta Wierzbicka; Khaled Abass; Joan O Grimalt; Andreas Erbe; Halina B Röllin; Pál Weihe; Gabriela Jiménez Díaz; Randolph Reyes Singh; Torkild Visnes; Arja Rautio; Jon Øyvind Odland; Martin Wagner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 11.035

6.  Fabrication of Nylon-6 and Nylon-11 Nanoplastics and Evaluation in Mammalian Cells.

Authors:  Sai Archana Krovi; Maria M Moreno Caffaro; Shyam Aravamudhan; Ninell P Mortensen; Leah M Johnson
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Harnessing PET to track micro- and nanoplastics in vivo.

Authors:  Outi Keinänen; Eric J Dayts; Cindy Rodriguez; Samantha M Sarrett; James M Brennan; Mirkka Sarparanta; Brian M Zeglis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Toxicological considerations of nano-sized plastics.

Authors:  P A Stapleton
Journal:  AIMS Environ Sci       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Nanopolystyrene translocation and fetal deposition after acute lung exposure during late-stage pregnancy.

Authors:  Sara B Fournier; Jeanine N D'Errico; Derek S Adler; Stamatina Kollontzi; Michael J Goedken; Laura Fabris; Edward J Yurkow; Phoebe A Stapleton
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Detection of Microplastic in Human Placenta and Meconium in a Clinical Setting.

Authors:  Thorsten Braun; Loreen Ehrlich; Wolfgang Henrich; Sebastian Koeppel; Ievgeniia Lomako; Philipp Schwabl; Bettina Liebmann
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.