| Literature DB >> 35638092 |
G Lamichhane1, A Acharya2, R Marahatha1, B Modi1, R Paudel1, A Adhikari3, B K Raut1, S Aryal3, N Parajuli1.
Abstract
Plastic pollution in various forms has emerged as the most severe environmental threat. Small plastic chunks, such as microplastics and nanoplastics derived from primary and secondary sources, are a major concern worldwide due to their adverse effects on the environment and public health. Several years have been spent developing robust spectroscopic techniques that should be considered top-notch; however, researchers are still trying to find efficient and straightforward methods for the analysis of microplastics but have yet to develop a viable solution. Because of the small size of these degraded plastics, they have been found in various species, from human brains to blood and digestive systems. Several pollution-controlling methods have been tested in recent years, and these methods are prominent and need to be developed. Bacterial degradation, sunlight-driven photocatalyst, fuels, and biodegradable plastics could be game-changers in future research on plastic pollution control. However, recent fledgling steps in controlling methods appear insufficient due to widespread contamination. As a result, proper regulation of environmental microplastics is a significant challenge, and the most equitable way to manage plastic pollution. Therefore, this paper discusses the current state of microplastics, some novel and well-known identification techniques, strategies for overcoming microplastic effects, and needed solutions to mitigate this planetary pollution. This review article, we believe, will fill a void in the field of plastic identification and pollution mitigation research.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial degradations; Microplastics; Plastic mitigation; Pollution
Year: 2022 PMID: 35638092 PMCID: PMC9135010 DOI: 10.1007/s13762-022-04261-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran) ISSN: 1735-1472 Impact factor: 3.519
Fig. 1Types, sources, and the way of formation of primary and secondary MPs (GESAMP 2015)
Fig. 2Some major polymer products found in MPs
Fig. 3FTIR (A–D) and images (E–H) of the most prevalent types of MPs found in samples; adopted from (Hu et al. 2018); copyright 2018 American Chemical Society
MPs occurrence and detection techniques
| Identification techniques | Items | MPs range | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dissection microscope at 30 × magnification | Honey and sugar | Colored fibers: 166 ± 147/kg of honey Fragments: 9 ± 9/kg of honey Colored fibers: 217 ± 123/kg of sugar 32 ± 7/kg of sugars | Liebezeit and Liebezeit ( |
| Visual microscopy | Seawater | 452 fibers and 827 particles, later confirmed by Raman spectra | Lenz et al. ( |
| Stereomicroscopy | Air | 2–355 particles/m2/day | Dris et al. ( |
| SEM | Atmospheric fallout | 175–313 particles/m2/day | Cai et al. ( |
| Fluorescence microscopy | Atmospheric deposition | 136.5–512.0 MPs particles per m2/day | Klein and Fischer ( |
| Optical Microscopy/SEM/EDS | Freshwater sport Fish | 16 MPs particles were identified in the 30 fish, and the sizes of MPs fragments ranged from 50 to 1500 μm | Wagner et al. ( |
| FTIR and Raman spectroscopy | Raw and treated drinking water | Raw: 1473 ± 34 to 3605 ± 497 particles/L Treated: 338 ± 76 to 628 ± 28 particles/L | Pivokonsky et al. ( |
| Micro-Raman spectroscopy | Tap water | 440 ± 275 particles/L | Tong et al. ( |
| FTIR | Surface water and Australian freshwater Paratya australiensis | Surface water: 0.40 ± 0.27 items/L Shrimp: 0.52 ± 0.55 items/and (24 ± 31 items/g) | Nan et al. ( |
| Soil sample | 0.34 ± 0.36 particles per kilogram dry weight of soil | Piehl et al. ( | |
| Ocean trawl and fish gut | Of the 46 trawl particles, 20 were MPs. All 28 particles extracted from GI tracts were MPs | Wagner et al. ( | |
| Sea-surface water | 110 particles/m3 | Kosore et al. ( | |
| Alpine glacier | 74.4 ± 28.3/kg | Ambrosini et al. ( | |
| Table salt products | 9.77 MPs particles/kg | Lee et al. ( | |
| Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry | Pet foods | Cat foods: < 1500 ng/g to 12,000 ng/g Dog foods: < 1500 to 4600 ng/g | Zhang et al. ( |
| Microfiltration | Honey, milk, soft drinks, and beer | On average, 40 MPs/L | Diaz-Basantes et al. ( |
| MFs-Millipore™ 0.45 µm pore size mixed cellulose esters membrane filters | Himalayan surface water | ≤ 5 mm to ≥ 250 µm in three one-liter surface water | Simpson ( |
| Pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS) | Lake sediments | 43 plastics debris/16 sediments | Castelvetro et al. ( |
| WWTP sample | 0.003 to 0.060 mg PS/m3 | Funck et al. ( | |
| Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry | Indoor dust; Clams digestive residues | 246 and 430 mg/kg PC and PET type MP; 63.7 mg/kg of PC and 127 mg/kg of PET MPs | Wang et al. ( |
Fig. 4Life cycle of MPs (from origin to disposal)
Fig. 5Conceptual diagram showing the various mechanisms via which MPs could affect the terrestrial ecosystem
Experimental designs for detecting impacts of MPs in aquatic organisms
| S. No | Organisms | Plastic types | Concentrations | Exposed duration | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PE, Polyhydroxy butyrate(PHB) | Dispersed in 5 ml of 0.1% Tween80 solution | 96 h | Decreased activity levels of CAT and GST in gills, SOD in digestive glands, and SeGPx in both tissues | Magara et al. ( | |
| 2 | PS | 50 mg particles/ml, was diluted 1:1000 in filtered seawater (FSW) to produce a stock suspension of 50 µg/ml | 8 days | Delayed development due to lower food intake and insufficient energy supply | Barnes et al. ( | |
| 3 | PET | 0.125 or 12.5 µg/ml | 7 days | No histological effects | Messinetti et al. ( | |
| 4 | PE | 20; 40; 80; 160 and 320 mg/L | 96 h | No toxic effects | Castro et al. ( | |
| 5 | PS | 1.0 mg/L | 3 days | The lowest survival rate, the most significant decrease in body length, and the shortest average life span | Lei et al. ( | |
| 6 | Microfibers/MPs fragments | 56–2544 particles kg-1 | – | Trophic transfer and biomagnification of MPs up the aquatic food chain | Hurley et al. ( | |
| 7 | PS alone or mixture with carbamazepine (Cbz) | PS (from 0.05 up to 50 mg/ L), to Cbz (6.3 μg/L) alone and to the mixture of PS + Cbz (0.05 mg/L + 6.3 μg/L) | 96 h | Increased total antioxidant capacity, genotoxicity, and lipid peroxidation | Brandts et al. ( | |
| 8 | Tadpole | PES & PP | 0 to 2.73 items individual − 1 | Hu et al. ( |
Fig. 6Potential threat to human health due to environmental exposure to MPs
Some of the potentially toxic effects of MPs and NPs on human health are listed below in the table
| Toxicity effect | Plastics | Size of plastics | Results | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxidative stress | PVC PMMA (poly methyl methacrylate) | 120 nm 140 nm | Increases reactive oxygen species (ROS), and reduce cell feasibility | Mahadevan and Valiyaveettil ( |
| Cationic PS NPs | 60 nm | Increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress | Chiu et al. ( | |
| Gastrointestinal effect | PS NPs | 50 nm and 200 nm | Alter intestinal ion transport | Mahler et al. ( |
| PS MPs | 0.5 µm and 5 µm | Increased metabolic disorder risk in the offspring | Luo et al. ( | |
| PS MPs | 0.5 and 50 μm | Induce mouse hepatic lipid disorder | Lu et al. | |
| PS MPs | 5 µm | Reduces intestinal mucus secretion and induce gut microbiota dysbiosis | Jin et al. ( | |
| Neurotoxicity | PS MPs | 5 and 20 μm | Increase in AChE activity in the liver, and may lead to the reduction in cholinergic neurotransmission efficiency | Deng et al. ( |
| PS NPs | 38.92 nm | Decreased locomotor activity | Rafiee et al. ( |
Fig. 7Pathways of MPs controlling techniques
Different strategies to combat the MPs all around the globe by different countries
| Year | Country/organization | Strategies/Act | Goal | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Netherland/The Dutch Plastic Soup Foundation | ‘Beat the Microbead’ campaign | To remove plastic microbeads from personal care products | Dauvergne ( |
| 2015 | US | The | To forbid the deliberate production and selling of non-biodegradable plastic microbeads in rinse items for personal care | McDevitt et al. ( |
| 2015 | United Nations (UN) | Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development | To minimize the adverse impact on human health and the environment due to loss of plastics, chemicals, and waste materials in the atmosphere | Rosa ( |
| 2016 | Canada | Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) | To prohibit the import and export of personal care exfoliating goods containing microbeads | Pettipas et al. ( |
| 2016 | World Economic Forum (WEF) | The New plastics Economy | To minimize plastic waste leakage into a natural environment and recycle reuse, and control plastics material biodegradation | The New Plastics Economy ( |
| 2017 | UK | United Kingdom Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs, 2016 | To ban microbeads in cosmetic and personal care goods | Xanthos and Walker ( |
| 2017 | China | Ban the import of 32 kinds of solid wastes, including plastic waste | To achieve global environmental sustainability by realizing the transition from export to domestic management and from landfilling to recycling | Wen et al. ( |
| 2018 | Japan | Recycle and reuse all plastics, including electronic appliances and automobile parts | Reducing disposable plastic waste by 25 percent by 2030 | The Japan Times ( |
| 2018 | Canada/G7 | Strategy on zero plastic waste/Ocean Plastics Charter | To take action on resource-efficient life cycle management approach to plastics in the economy | CCME ( |
| 2016/2018/2021 | India | Ban single plastic bags/ Banned plastic bags below 50 μm | India Proposes Phase-Out of Single-Use Plastic Items by 2022 | Laskar and Kumar ( |
| 2011–2021 | Nepal | Plastic Bag Regulation and Control Directive 2011; Solid Waste Management (SWM) | Single plastic banned; banned < 40 micron thickness plastics | Bhardwaj et al. ( |