| Literature DB >> 35814422 |
Yixin Liu1,2, Haitao Qi3, Chunni Wang3, Jiaxing Deng3, Yilong Tan3, Lin Lin3, Zhirou Cui3, Jin Li1, Lishuang Qi3.
Abstract
Background: To identify a computed tomography (CT) derived radiomic signature for the options of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCR) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Entities:
Keywords: candidate therapeutic agents; computed tomography; concurrent chemo-radiotherapy; non-small cell lung cancer; radiomic signature
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814422 PMCID: PMC9256940 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.832343
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Baseline clinical characteristics of patients in the analyzed datasets.
| Discovery dataset ( | Validation dataset ( | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ≤ 65 | 78 (51.0%) | 35 (47.9%) |
| > 65 | 70 (45.8%) | 34 (46.6%) |
|
| ||
| Female | 54 (35.3%) | 28 (38.4%) |
| Male | 99 (64.7%) | 45 (61.6%) |
|
| ||
| I | – | – |
| II | – | – |
| III | 153 (100%) | 73 (100%) |
|
| ||
| T1 | 20 (13.1%) | 20 (27.4%) |
| T2 | 68 (44.4%) | 24 (32.9%) |
| T3 | 21 (13.7%) | 10 (13.7%) |
| T4 | 41 (26.8%) | 19 (26.0%) |
|
| ||
| N0 | – | – |
| N1 | – | – |
| N2 | 97 (63.4%) | 44 (60.3%) |
| N3 | 56 (36.6%) | 29 (39.7%) |
|
| ||
| ADC | 18 (11.8%) | 11 (15.1%) |
| SCC | 53 (34.6%) | 22 (30.1%) |
| LCC | 53 (34.6%) | 23 (31.5%) |
| NOS | 22 (14.4%) | 13 (17.8%) |
|
| 28.65 | 34.78 |
ADC, Adenocarcinoma; SCC, Squamous cell carcinoma; LCC, Large-cell lung carcinoma; NOS, Not otherwise specified subtype.
Figure 1Flowchart of developing and validating of a radiomic signature derived from computer tomography (CT) for the patients with NSCLC receiving CCR treatment.
Figure 2Feature selection and survival analyzes for patients with NSCLC receiving CCR in the discovery dataset. (A) Tuning parameter (λ) selection in the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox model used a 10-fold cross-validation via minimum criteria. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve was plotted versus log(λ). (B) Kaplan–Meier curves of the 5-year survival rate for 153 patients. (C) Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of CCR-9RS in predicting the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates. (D) Multivariate Cox analyzes of CCR-9RS after adjusting for clinical factors.
Composition of CCR-9RS.
| Radiomic feature name | HR |
| C-index |
|---|---|---|---|
| squareroot_gldm_DependenceVariance | 1.06 | 0.0011 | 0.58 |
| wavelet_LHH_glcm_JointAverage | 1.10 | 0.0067 | 0.55 |
| wavelet_LHH_glcm_SumAverage | 1.05 | 0.0067 | 0.55 |
| wavelet_LHH_firstorder_Range | 1.01 | 0.0053 | 0.55 |
| wavelet_LHH_glszm_ZoneEntropy | 1.67 | 0.0051 | 0.56 |
| wavelet_LLH_glrlm_LongRunHighGrayLevelEmphasis | 1.01 | 0.0005 | 0.57 |
| wavelet_LLH_glszm_SizeZoneNonUniformity | 1.01 | 0.0002 | 0.58 |
| wavelet_HHH_glszm_SizeZoneNonUniformity | 1.02 | 2.91E-05 | 0.56 |
| wavelet_HHL_glszm_SizeZoneNonUniformityNormalized | 5370.36 | 0.0042 | 0.57 |
HR and P-value are the statistics calculated using a univariate Cox regression model. HR represents the risk coefficient of the quantitative values for the feature; P-value represents the significance of the quantitative values for radiomic feature.
Figure 3Validation of CCR-9RS. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves of 5-year survival rate for patients in the validation dataset (n = 73). (B) Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of CCR-9RS in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates in the validation dataset. (C) Multivariate Cox analyzes of CCR-9RS after adjusting for clinical factors in the validation dataset.
Figure 4Radiomic nomogram and its performance for patients with NSCLC receiving CCR treatment. (A) Survival radiomic nomogram that incorporated with CCR-9RS and the clinical factors trained in the discovery cohort (n=153). The points of CCR-9RS and the clinical factors were obtained based on the top ‘points’ bar (scale: 0–100). The total point was calculated by summing the two points, and a line was drawn downward to the survival axes to determine the likelihood of 1-, 3-, or 5-year survival rate. (B, C) Calibration curves for the radiomic nomogram in the discovery and validation datasets; the diagonal gray line represents an ideal evaluation. (D, E) Decision curves for the radiomic nomogram in the discovery and validation datasets.
Performances of different models.
| C-index (95% CIs) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Discovery dataset | Validation dataset | |
|
| 0.65 (0.60 - 0.71) | 0.66 (0.59 - 0.74) |
|
| 0.61 (0.57 - 0.65) | 0.61 (0.55 - 0.68) |
|
| 0.57 (0.51 - 0.63) | 0.58 (0.50 - 0.66) |
Figure 5Molecular characteristics associated with CCR-9RS in NSCLC. (A) Gene-enrichment analysis of correlated genes with 6 radiomic features in CCR-9RS based on the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database in the NRG (NSCLC-Radiogenomics) dataset. (B) Molecular lesions and immune landscapes along with the resistant scores calculated by CCR-9RS. The correlation was estimated by Spearman rank correlation. The histogram on the right represents the significantly correlation with the resistant scores of CCR-9RS; the orange-dotted line represents P = 0.05.
Figure 6Identification of potential therapeutic agents for the patients resistant to CCR treatment. (A) Venn diagram of the resistant genes identified in tumor tissues (NSCLC-Radiogenomics dataset) and essential genes identified by CRISPR dataset. The blue circle represents the essential genes screened by CRISPR dataset and the red circle represents the resistant genes significantly positively associated with the resistant scores of the CCR-9RS in the NSCLC-Radiogenomics dataset. (B) A gene-agent network of essential resistant genes and candidate therapeutic agents using DrugBank database. The blue dotted line represents the significantly correlated essential resistant genes (Pearson correlation, FDR < 0.05, ) and the red dotted line represents the candidate therapeutic agents targeting essential resistant genes in DrugBank database. (C) The correlation analysis of four overlapped therapeutic agents corresponding to two essential resistant genes using GDSC cancer cell line dataset. (D) Binomial distribution for the down-regulated and up-regulated resistance genes induced by AT-7519. (E) The number of down-regulated resistance genes induced by AT-7519 in three dose groups (left to right: Low, Middle and High).