| Literature DB >> 33093525 |
J Baison1, Linghua Zhou1, Nils Forsberg1, Tommy Mörling1, Thomas Grahn2, Lars Olsson2, Bo Karlsson3, Harry X Wu1, Ewa J Mellerowicz1, Sven-Olof Lundqvist2,4, María Rosario García-Gil5.
Abstract
Through the use of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) mapping it is possible to establish the genetic basis of phenotypic trait variation. Our GWAS study presents the first such effort in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L). Karst.) for the traits related to wood tracheid characteristics. The study employed an exome capture genotyping approach that generated 178 101 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) from 40 018 probes within a population of 517 Norway spruce mother trees. We applied a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) based association mapping method using a functional multi-locus mapping approach, with a stability selection probability method as the hypothesis testing approach to determine significant Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs). The analysis has provided 30 significant associations, the majority of which show specific expression in wood-forming tissues or high ubiquitous expression, potentially controlling tracheids dimensions, their cell wall thickness and microfibril angle. Among the most promising candidates based on our results and prior information for other species are: Picea abies BIG GRAIN 2 (PabBG2) with a predicted function in auxin transport and sensitivity, and MA_373300g0010 encoding a protein similar to wall-associated receptor kinases, which were both associated with cell wall thickness. The results demonstrate feasibility of GWAS to identify novel candidate genes controlling industrially-relevant tracheid traits in Norway spruce.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33093525 PMCID: PMC7581746 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72586-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
List of the traits, their abbreviations and measurement unit.
| Trait | Abbreviation | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Ring | TWrRing | μm |
| Earlywood | TWrEW | μm |
| Transitionwood | TWrTW | μm |
| Latewood | TWrLW | μm |
| Ring | TWtRing | μm |
| Earlywood | TWtEW | μm |
| Transitionwood | TWtTW | μm |
| Latewood | TWtLW | μm |
| Ring | WTRing | μm |
| Earlywood | WTEW | μm |
| Transitionwood | WTTW | μm |
| Latewood | WTLW | μm |
| Ring | CRing | mg/m |
| Earlywood | CEW | mg/m |
| Transitionwood | CTW | mg/m |
| Latewood | CLW | mg/m |
| Ring | MFARing | Degrees |
| Corewood | MFACORE | Degrees |
| Outerwood | MFAOUTER | Degrees |
| Transition age (cambial) | MFATA | Year |
Figure 1Box plot of the estimated genotypic effects for all significant associations identified in the study. The middle line represents the median value of the phenotype with that of the genotype. Upper and lower bounds of the box are the 25% (Q1) and 75% (Q3) quantile. Whiskers are Q1-1.5*Interquartile range (IQR) and Q3 + 1.5*IQR, therefore the outliers are values outside the range (Q1-1.5*IQR to Q3 + 1.5*IQ. Yellow, orange and red colored boxplots indicate the genotypic classes per SNP. Significant level were obtained by Kruskal–wallis test[68].
Phenotype, QTL position, allele frequencies and modes of allele inheritance.
| Phenotype | QTL1 | SNP2 | Region, Feature | Alleles | Inclusion frequency | PVE ( | 2a3 | d4 | d/a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MFACORE | 129,716 | MA_10117352g0010_1285 | Synonymous | T/C | 0.548 | 1.47 | 0.403 | 0.168 | 0.836 |
| MFAOUTER | 165,836 | MA_10434903g0010_8217 | Intron variant | T/A | 0.600 | 1.03 | 0.190 | − 0.002 | − 0.025 |
| TWrEW | 166,535 | MA_10435070g0010_17636 | Missense | T/C | 0.627 | 3.16 | 0.349 | − 0.053 | − 0.304 |
| TWrLW | 95,509 | MA_336364g0010_6123 | Missense | C/T | 0.665 | 0.05 | 0.007 | − 0.039 | − 11.489 |
| 12,016 | MA_11172g0010_18275 | Splice variant | A/G | 0.579 | 0.01 | 0.051 | − 0.078 | − 3.058 | |
| 160,388 | MA_10433459g0010_6695 | Upstream | G/T | 0.604 | 1.72 | 0.118 | 0.042 | 0.701 | |
| 44,384 | MA_64438g0010_10851 | Missense | A/C | 0.546 | 0.03 | 0.395 | 0.024 | 0.123 | |
| 59,913 | MA_96801g0010_10438 | Synonymous | C/T | 0.547 | 0.10 | 0.212 | 0.022 | 0.211 | |
| 116,013 | MA_950574g0010_7132 | Upstream | T/A | 0.558 | 0.05 | 0.451 | 0.004 | 0.017 | |
| 120,168 | MA_7460525g0010_2105 | Upstream | G/A | 0.561 | 2.27 | 0.140 | 0.045 | 0.642 | |
| TWtEW | 131,776 | MA_10239556g0010_ | Upstream | T/G | 0.633 | 1.80 | 0.072 | 0.002 | 0.069 |
| TWtTW | MA_10436040g0010_61320 | Upstream | G/A | 0.661 | 2.13 | 0.003 | − 0.039 | − 24.638 | |
| TWtRing | MA_10436040g0010_61320 | Upstream | G/A | 0.566 | 3.79 | 0.019 | − 0.046 | − 4.646 | |
| WTEW | 51,296 | MA_80033g0010_7384 | Missense | T/C | 0.541 | 0.01 | 0.047 | 0.0007 | 0.033 |
| MA_105586g0010_7132 | Missense | T/C | 0.536 | 0.10 | 0.032 | − 0.002 | − 0.114 | ||
| 19,482 | MA_17843g0010_11398 | Missense | A/G | 0.546 | 0.01 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.976 | |
| MA_492000g0010_1672 | Upstream | A/T | 0.582 | 0.10 | 0.032 | − 0.021 | − 1.277 | ||
| WTLW | 1 | MA_5g0010_86525 | Upstream | G/A | 0.876 | 0.01 | 0.046 | 0.008 | 0.356 |
| 9,848 | MA_9125g0010_34791 | Upstream | T/C | 0.64 | 0.10 | 0.053 | 0.004 | 0.131 | |
| 112,677 | MA_885527g0010_4213 | Upstream | C/T | 0.795 | 0.02 | 0.059 | 0.018 | 0.591 | |
| 126,271 | MA_9357928g0010_1204 | Upstream | G/A | 0.567 | 0.02 | 0.060 | − 0.024 | − 0.809 | |
| MA_10426383g0010_7358 | Synonymous | A/G | 0.61 | 1.57 | 0.097 | − 0.0007 | − 0.015 | ||
| WTRing | 103,326 | MA_492000g0010_1596 | Synonymous | T/C | 0.726 | 1.78 | 0.038 | − 0.003 | − 0.163 |
| 127,327 | MA_9563494g0010_4010 | Missense | G/T | 0.509 | 0.01 | 0.084 | − 0.019 | − 0.464 | |
| 78,937 | MA_138164g0010_2032 | Downstream | C/T | 0.529 | 1.25 | 0.007 | 0.001 | 0.442 | |
| CEW | MA_105586g0010_7132 | Missense | T/C | 0.633 | 2.08 | 5.481 | − 0.238 | − 0.087 | |
| CTW | 96,993 | MA_373300g0010_1844 | Upstream | C/T | 0.559 | 3.62 | 1.905 | 0.791 | 0.831 |
| MA_10426383g0010_7358 | Synonymous | A/G | 0.53 | 3.25 | 9.214 | 0.533 | 0.116 | ||
| CLW | 16,320 | MA_15229g0010_ | Upstream | A/T | 0.512 | 0.78 | 4.120 | 1.448 | 0.703 |
| MA_10426383g0010_7358 | Synonymous | A/G | 0.635 | 1.40 | 9.434 | 0.146 | 0.031 |
1Bold QTLs indicate associations that have been detected across and within traits.
2SNP: The SNP name is composed of contig (MA_number) and SNP position on contig. As an example, the SNP MA_10117352g0010_1285 is located on contig MA_10117352 at position 1,285 bp. QTL is the value extracted after the Stability selection probability (SSP) has been performed to indicate the significant associations. This value then points to the significant SNP.
3Calculated as the difference between the phenotype means observed within each homozygous class (2a =|GBB-Gbb|, where Gij is the trait mean in the ijth genotype class).
4Calculated as the difference between the phenotypic mean observed within the heterozygous class and the average phenotypic mean across both homozygous classes [d = GBb-0.5(GBB + Gbb), where Gij is the trait mean in the ijth genotypic class].
Figure 2The heatmap showing levels of the variance stabilized transformed expression values (VST values) of spruce candidate genes in different organs and tissues based on ExAtlas data[74]
available at https://congenie.org. (Microsoft excel).
Figure 3Expression (Variance stabilized transformed expression values) profiles of selected candidate genes in wood developing tissues of sections through developing wood zones, phloem to mature xylem of spruce based on NorWood dataset (https://norwood.congenie.org/norwood-v1.0/[66]). Expression profiles of three trees sampled during the peak of wood formation in the summer are shown. The X-axis shows numbers of consecutive tangential sections through the developing wood zones. The zone numbers corresponding to: (i) cambium-radial expansion zone, (ii) secondary wall formation zone, and (iii) mature zone are shown above the graphs for each treey[68].