Literature DB >> 26391735

A novel self-propelled disposable colonoscope is effective for colonoscopy in humans (with video).

Nathan Gluck1, Alaa Melhem1, Zamir Halpern1, Klaus Mergener2, Erwin Santo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The self-propelled disposable colonoscope (SPDC) with a 360° view is designed to enhance visualization, minimize risks of perforation and infection transmission, and shorten operator training time associated with conventional colonoscopy (CC). We evaluated SPDC efficacy for cecal intubation and safety.
METHODS: Prospective patients presenting for colorectal cancer screening underwent SPDC immediately followed by CC. Initial patients necessary for SPDC operators to achieve proficiency comprised the training cohort. Subsequent enrolled patients comprised the study cohort. SPDC colonoscopy was performed up to the cecum, where anatomic landmarks were photographed and mucosal suction marks were placed. During SPDC withdrawal, polyps were recorded and similarly marked. On the second pass (by using CC), any potential mucosal damage and suction marks from the SPDC as well as polyps were recorded. Main endpoints included SPDC cecal intubation rates, confirmed by anatomic landmarks and residual marks seen on subsequent CC, and frequency and severity of adverse events and mucosal damage with SPDC. The secondary endpoint was subjective procedure proficiency, evaluated by the operator based on the training cohort. The tertiary endpoint was documenting pathologies visualized with SPDC.
RESULTS: Fifty-six of 58 enrolled subjects completed the study. Proficiency with SPDC was attained after 8 to 10 procedures. Cecal intubation was successful in 98.2% (55/56 subjects; 95% confidence interval [CI], 90.4%-99.9%), including 100% (95% CI, 90.7%-100%) of the study cohort and 94.4% (95% CI, 72.7%-99.9%) of the training cohort. No mucosal damage or adverse events were reported. SPDC detected 87.5% of polyps seen in tandem CC, including all polyps larger than 5 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: SPDC was highly successful, simple to use, and safe in achieving complete colonoscopy (cecal intubation). ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 0692-12-TLV.).
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26391735     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  Robotic colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability and safety. Preliminary clinical results from a pilot study.

Authors:  Antonello Trecca; Filippo Catalano; Antonino Bella; Raffaele Borghini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Building a Team-Based Gastroenterology Practice With Advanced Practice Providers.

Authors:  John I Allen; Leslie Aldrich; Marc Moote
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2019-04

Review 3.  Flexible Gastro-intestinal Endoscopy - Clinical Challenges and Technical Achievements.

Authors:  Niehls Kurniawan; Martin Keuchel
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 7.271

Review 4.  New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Emerging next-generation robotic colonoscopy systems towards painless colonoscopy.

Authors:  Chung-Kwong Yeung; Jo Lk Cheung; Biji Sreedhar
Journal:  J Dig Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.325

Review 6.  Guidelines for Robotic Flexible Endoscopy at the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Onaizah Onaizah; Zaneta Koszowska; Conchubhair Winters; Venkatamaran Subramanian; David Jayne; Alberto Arezzo; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Application of robotic technologies in lower gastrointestinal tract endoscopy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Harpreet Kaur Sekhon Inderjit Singh; Emily Rose Armstrong; Sujay Shah; Reza Mirnezami
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 8.  Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review.

Authors:  Conchubhair Winters; Venkataraman Subramanian; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.374

9.  Hydro-jet propelled colonoscopy: proof of concept in a phantom colon.

Authors:  Stuart A Coleman; Markus Pakleppa; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Endorobots for Colonoscopy: Design Challenges and Available Technologies.

Authors:  Luigi Manfredi
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-07-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.