Literature DB >> 33088769

Screening Test for LPRD: History Versus Video Laryngoscopy.

Prasun Mishra1, Deeksha Agrawal1, Purva Artham1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find a better screening test by correlating between history and video-laryngoscopy in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease. To compare the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and the Reflux Finding Score (RFS).
METHOD: Patients with the signs and symptoms of LPRD were scored based on RSI. Those with RSI above 13 were included in study and evaluated further by videolaryngoscopy examination and rated according to RFS. The correlation between RSI and RFS was analysed. RESULT: Out of the 107 patients included in study 55% were females. Among these patients positive RFS score (i.e. > 7) was seen in 58.3%. The average RSI was 18.22, and average RFS was 7.45. According to RSI the most common symptom was heartburn/indigestion (44.5%) and from RFS the most common finding was posterior commissure hypertrophy (95%). Correlation between RSI and total RFS was found to be 0.184 with a p value of 0.159 which was not significant.
CONCLUSION: LPRD is more common in females and in the middle age group. A correlation of RSI and RFS was not found to be significant suggesting that both should be used for diagnosis of LPRD instead of relying on only one. RFS and RSI are easy, quick and out patient based screening tools and when used together can be more reliable for LPRD diagnosis. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LPRD; RFS; RSI; Screening; Videolaryngoscopy

Year:  2020        PMID: 33088769      PMCID: PMC7544795          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-01828-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders.

Authors:  J A Koufman; M R Amin; M Panetti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  James A Koufman; Jonathan E Aviv; Roy R Casiano; Gary Y Shaw
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Controversies in the diagnosis and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Kendall
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Reflux symptom index versus reflux finding score.

Authors:  Tamer A Mesallam; Joseph C Stemple; Tarek M Sobeih; Ravindhra G Elluru
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  How much pharyngeal exposure is "normal"? Normative data for laryngopharyngeal reflux events using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII).

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Alejandro F Sanz; Katie S Nason; Thomas L Carroll; Clark Rosen; Daniel P Normolle; Nicholas J Shaheen; James D Luketich; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of chronic laryngitis associated with reflux.

Authors:  D G Hanson; J J Jiang
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-03-06       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).

Authors:  P C Belafsky; G N Postma; J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  The impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on patient-reported quality of life.

Authors:  Ricardo L Carrau; Aliaa Khidr; Joseph A Crawley; Eric M Hillson; Judith K Davis; Chris L Pashos
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  [A pilot study on diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux disease by pH monitoring in laryngopharynx].

Authors:  Gui-Jian Feng; Li-Hong Zhang; Li-Li Zhao; Yu-Lan Liu
Journal:  Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2008-03-25

10.  Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma; James A Koufman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.