Literature DB >> 22033702

How much pharyngeal exposure is "normal"? Normative data for laryngopharyngeal reflux events using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance (HMII).

Toshitaka Hoppo1, Alejandro F Sanz, Katie S Nason, Thomas L Carroll, Clark Rosen, Daniel P Normolle, Nicholas J Shaheen, James D Luketich, Blair A Jobe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) can cause atypical symptoms, asthma, and pulmonary fibrosis. The aim of this study was to establish the normative data for LPR using hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HMII).
METHODS: Asymptomatic subjects underwent endoscopy followed by 24-h HMII using a specialized impedance catheter configured to detect LPR before and after a 2-week course of proton pump inhibitors (PPI). Subjects were excluded if they had esophageal pathology or a positive DeMeester score. A cohort of 24 LPR patients who had a complete response to treatment was used for comparison with the normative data.
RESULTS: Forty subjects were enrolled. Thirty-four subjects completed one, and 25 completed both HMII testing periods off and on PPI. There was no difference in the total number of reflux events between off and on PPI [22 (8-32) and 24 (10-28), respectively, p = 0.89]. The 95th percentiles of LPR off and on PPI were 0 and 1, respectively. All patients with treatment responsive LPR had pre-treatment HMII values of LPR greater than the 95th percentile.
CONCLUSION: LPR events are rare in an asymptomatic population. One or more LPR events should be considered abnormal in patients with LPR symptoms regardless of whether there is a positive DeMeester score.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22033702      PMCID: PMC4091908          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1741-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  36 in total

1.  Proton pump inhibitors: better acid suppression when taken before a meal than without a meal.

Authors:  J G Hatlebakk; P O Katz; L Camacho-Lobato; D O Castell
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 8.171

Review 2.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux: More questions than answers.

Authors:  David W Barry; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.321

3.  Normal values of 24-hour combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Ying L Xiao; Jin K Lin; Ting K Cheung; Nina Y H Wong; Li Yang; Ivan F N Hung; Benjamin C Y Wong; Min H Chen
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 4.  Clinical importance of impedance measurements.

Authors:  Amit Agrawal; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.062

5.  Airway responses to esophageal acidification.

Authors:  Ivan M Lang; Steven T Haworth; Bidyut K Medda; David L Roerig; Hubert V Forster; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.619

6.  Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  I Mainie; R Tutuian; A Agrawal; D Adams; D O Castell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Surgical fundoplication in laryngopharyngeal reflux unresponsive to aggressive acid suppression: a controlled study.

Authors:  Jason Swoger; Jeff Ponsky; Douglas M Hicks; Joel E Richter; Tom I Abelson; Claudio Milstein; Mohammed A Qadeer; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  The gastroesophageal flap valve: in vitro and in vivo observations.

Authors:  L D Hill; R A Kozarek; S J Kraemer; R W Aye; C D Mercer; D E Low; C E Pope
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 9.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma; James A Koufman
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  26 in total

1.  Hypopharyngeal pepsin and Sep70 as diagnostic markers of laryngopharyngeal reflux: preliminary study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Komatsu; Lori A Kelly; Ali H Zaidi; Christina L Rotoloni; Juliann E Kosovec; Emily J Lloyd; Amina Waheed; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Toward an improved understanding of isolated upright reflux: positional effects on the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Alejandro Nieponice; Joan Schrenker; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Reflux and Voice Disorders: Have We Established Causality?

Authors:  G Todd Schneider; Michael F Vaezi; David O Francis
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2016-07-09

5.  A new diagnostic paradigm for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: correlation of impedance-pH monitoring and digital reflux scintigraphy results.

Authors:  Jin-Soo Park; Oleksandr Khoma; Leticia Burton; Hans Van der Wall; Gregory Leighton Falk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Sep70/Pepsin expression in hypopharynx combined with hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance increases diagnostic sensitivity of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Toshitaka Hoppo; Ali H Zaidi; Daisuke Matsui; Samantha A Martin; Yoshihiro Komatsu; Emily J Lloyd; Juliann E Kosovec; Albert A Civitarese; Natalie H Boyd; Amit Shetty; Ashten N Omstead; Emily Smith; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance leads to the promising outcome of antireflux surgery in Japanese population with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Takeshi Suzuki; Yosuke Seki; Yoshitaka Okamoto; Toshitaka Hoppo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Modern medical and surgical management of difficult-to-treat GORD.

Authors:  Frank Zerbib; Daniel Sifrim; Radu Tutuian; Stephen Attwood; Lars Lundell
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Ratio between proximal/distal gastroesophageal reflux does not discriminate abnormal proximal reflux.

Authors:  Sebastião Carlos Pannocchia Neto; Fernando A M Herbella; Luciana C Silva; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Correlation between Reflux and multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring in untreated volunteers.

Authors:  Marie E Jetté; Eric A Gaumnitz; Martin A Birchall; Nathan V Welham; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.